Limitation
of our analysis to patients with known locali-
zation of lesions gave similar results but remaining even
after correction (P = 0.009, P
corr. = 0.027, OR = 0.53, 95%
CI = 0.33–0.85; Table S2).
Comparison of patients with minimal and mild (I + II)
with moderate and severe (III + IV) endometriosis
revealed a protective effect of rs1632947:GG genotype
(P = 0.04, OR = 0.2, 95% CI = 0.04–0.97), and, in addi-
tion, of rs1233334:CT genotype (P = 0.04, OR = 0.09,
95% CI = 0.01–0.62; Table 3). These associations lost signif-
icance after correction (P
corr. = 0.12 for both comparisons).
Analysis of peritoneal vs ovarian localization of lesions
showed protective effects of rs1632947:GG genotype against
ovarian endometriosis (P = 0.028, P
corr. = 0.08, OR = 0.16,
95% CI = 0.03–0.84), whereas rs1233334:CT genotype
gave a significant result only for peritoneal vs ovarian plus
peritoneal endometriosis (P = 0.01, P
corr. = 0.03, OR = 0.02,
Table 2 HLA-G genotype
and minor allele frequencies
in women from Control and
Endometriosis groups
H–W Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium, P probability, OR odds ratio, 95% CI 95% confidence interval from
two-sided Fisher’s exact test, χ
2
df = 2 p Chi-square test for independence with two degrees of freedom for
polymorphisms 14 bp ins/del (rs371194629:insATT TGT TCA TGC CT/del) in 3′UTR and rs1632947:G>A,
χ2
df = 4 p Chi-square test for independence with four degrees of freedom for the polymorphism
rs1233334:G>C/T
*Reference
a Pcorr. = 0.12
Genotype Control (%) Patients (%) Patients vs control
P OR 95% CI Test for inde-
pendence
p χ2
rs371194629:ins/del N = 314 N = 276
Del/del* 113 (35.99) 97 (35.14) 1 0.56 1.15
Ins/del 149 (47.45) 124 (44.93) 0.93 0.97 (0.68–1.39)
Ins/ins 52 (16.56) 55 (19.93) 0.41 1.23 (0.77–1.96)
Minor allele ins 253 (40.29) 234 (42.39)
H-W 0.81 0.18
rs1632947:G>A N = 314 N = 276 0.08 4.97
AA* 63 (20.06) 76 (27.54) 1
AG 157 (50.00) 131 (47.46) 0.08 0.69 (0.46–1.04)
GG 94 (29.94) 69 (25.00) 0.04a 0.61 (0.39–0.96)
Minor allele A 283 (45.06) 283 (51.27)
H-W 0.86 0.41
rs1233334:G>C/T N = 314 N = 276 0.65 2.48
CC* 215 (68.47) 188 (68.12) 1
CG 79 (25.16) 70 (25.36) 1.00 1.01 (0.70–1.47)
GG 8 (2.55) 6 (2.17) 1.00 0.86 (0.29–2.52)
GT 1 (0.32) 4 (1.45) 0.19 4.57 (0.51–41.31)
CT 11 (3.50) 8 (2.90) 0.82 0.83 (0.33–2.11)
TT 0 (0.00) 0 (0.00) – – –
Minor allele T 12 (1.91) 12 (2.17)
H-W 0.51 0.24
606 Molecular Genetics and Genomics (2018) 293:601–613
1 3
95% CI = 0.001–0.53). Analysis of all rs1233334 genotypes
revealed even higher significance (p = 0.006, χ2 = 14.35;
Table 4). On the other hand, no association with any form
of endometriosis was found for the 14 base pair insertion/
deletion polymorphism (rs371194629) in the HLA-G gene
(Tables 2, 3, 4 and Table S2).
LILRB1 and LILRB2 but not KIR2DL4 polymorphisms
are associated with endometriosis
LILRB1 rs41308748:G>A polymorphism was distrib-
uted differently between patients and controls ( P = 0.0048,
Pcorr. = 0.024, OR = 4.62, 95% CI = 1.52–14.02 for AA geno-
type, and p = 0.0035, χ2 = 11.33 for all genotypes; Table 5).
Similar results were found by analysis according to the
stage of the disease (P = 0.007, P
corr. = 0.035, OR = 4.8,
95% CI = 1.52–15.15 for AA, and p = 0.007, χ2 = 9.93
for all genotypes), and localization of lesions (P = 0.011,
Pcorr. = 0.055, OR = 4.24, 95% CI = 1.36–13.21 for AA and
p = 0.01, χ2 = 9.12 for all genotypes; Table S3). The frequency
of other examined SNPs did not differ between analyzed
groups (Table S3).
LILRB2 rs383369:AG genotype was almost five times more
frequent in severe stages (III + IV) of endometriosis than in
milder (I + II) stages (P = 0.043, P
corr. = 0.215, OR = 7.02,
95% CI = 0.90–54.43, Table 6). A similar, albeit no signifi-
cant difference was seen in comparison of peritoneal only
with peritoneal + ovarian endometriosis (P = 0.09, OR = 3.8,
95% CI = 0.81–17.77; Table S4).
Neither the other LILRB2 SNP (rs7247538:T>C) nor
KIR2DL4 (rs649216:T>C) or LILRB1 (rs41308748:G>A and
rs1061680:T>C) was distributed differently between mild and
severe disease (Table 6). None of other polymorphisms was
associated with localization of lesions (Table S4).
Table 3 HLA-G genotype
frequencies in women
depending on the severity of
endometriosis
E I + II endometriosis I + II, E III + IV endometriosis III + IV, P probability, OR odds ratio, 95% CI 95%
confidence interval from two-sided Fisher’s exact test, χ
2
df = 2 p Chi-square test for independence with
two degrees of freedom for the 14 bp ins/del (rs371194629:insATT TGT TCA TGC CT/del) in 3′UTR and
rs1632947:G>A polymorphisms, χ2
df = 4 p Chi-square test for independence with four degrees of freedom
for the polymorphism rs1233334:G>C/T, χ2
df = 1 p Chi-square test for trend with one degree of freedom for
all tested polymorphisms; *Reference
a Pcorr. = 0.12
b Pcorr. = 0.12
Genotype E I + II (%) E III + IV (%) E III + IV vs E I + II
P OR 95% CI Test for
independ-
ence
Test for
trend
p χ
2 p χ2
rs371194629:ins/del N = 16 N = 187
Del/del* 8 (50.00) 62 (33.16) 1 0.24 2.89 0.52 0.41
Ins/del 4 (25.00) 87 (46.52) 0.13 2.81 (0.81–9.74)
Ins/ins 4 (25.00) 38 (20.32) 1.00 1.23 (0.35–4.35)
Minor allele ins 12 (37.50) 163 (43.58)
rs1632947:G>A N = 16 N = 187
AA* 2 (12.50) 56 (29.95) 1 0.05 5.86 0.022 5.26
AG 6 (37.50) 87 (46.52) 0.71 0.52 (0.10–2.66)
GG 8 (50.00) 44 (23.53) 0.04a 0.20 (0.04–0.97)
Minor allele A 10 (31.25) 199 (53.21)
rs1233334:G>C/T N = 16 N = 187
CC* 8 (50.00) 132 (70.59) 1 0.05 9.27 0.013 6.15
CG 5 (31.25) 44 (23.53) 0.33 0.53 (0.17–1.72)
GG 1 (6.25) 5 (2.67) 0.32 0.30 (0.03–2.91)
GT 0 (0.00) 3 (1.60) 1.00 0.45 (0.02–9.43)
CT 2 (12.50) 3 (1.60) 0.04b 0.09 (0.01–0.62)
TT 0 (0.00) 0 (0.00)
Minor allele T 2 (6.25) 6 (1.60)
607Molecular Genetics and Genomics (2018) 293:601–613
1 3
Table 4 HLA-G genotype frequencies in women from endometriosis groups depending on the localization of lesions
P probability, OR odds ratio, 95% CI 95% confidence interval from two-sided Fisher’s exact test, χ 2
df = 2 p Chi-square test for independence with two degrees of freedom for the 14 bp ins/del
(rs371194629:ins ATT TGT TCA TGC CT/del) in 3′UTR and rs1632947:G>A polymorphisms, χ2
df = 4 p Chi-square test for independence with four degrees of freedom for the polymorphism of
the rs1233334:G>C/T
*Reference
a Pcorr. = 0.08
b Pcorr. = 0.03
Genotype Endometriosis
peritoneal only
Endometriosis
ovarian only
Endometriosis
ovarian + peritoneal
Endometriosis peritoneal only vs endometriosis
ovarian only
Endometriosis peritoneal only vs endometriosis
ovarian + peritoneal
Endometriosis ovarian only vs endometriosis
ovarian + peritoneal
P OR 95% CI
Test for inde-
pendence
P OR 95% CI
Test for inde-
pendence
P OR 95% CI
Test for
independ-
ence
p χ
2 p χ2 p χ2
rs371194629:ins/
del
N = 16 N = 136 N = 92
Del/del* 8 (50.00) 43 (31.62) 34 (36.95) 1 0.23 2.97 1 0.38 1.94 1 0.70 0.72
Ins/del 4 (25.00) 30 (22.06) 18 (19.57) 0.76 1.40 (0.38–5.06) 1.00 1.06 (0.28-4.00) 0.57 0.76 (0.36–1.59)
Ins/ins 4 (25.00) 63 (46.32) 40 (43.48) 0.12 2.93 (0.83–10.35) 0.22 2.35 (0.65–8.50) 0.54 0.80 (0.44–1.46)
Minor allele ins 12 (37.50) 156 (57.35) 98 (53.26)
rs1632947:G>A N = 16 N = 136 N = 92
AA* 2 (12.50) 44 (32.35) 26 (28.26) 1 0.042 6.33 1 0.28 2.57 1 0.29 2.49
AG 7 (43.75) 67 (49.26) 41 (44.57) 0.48 0.44 (0.90–2.19) 0.47 0.45 (0.09–2.34) 1.00 1.04 (0.56–1.93)
GG 7 (43.75) 25 (18.38) 25 (27.17) 0.028a 0.16 (0.03–0.84) 0.15 0.27 (0.05–1.45) 0.19 1.69 (0.81–3.54)
Minor allele A 11 (34.38) 155 (56.99) 129 (47.43)
rs1233334:G>C/T N = 16 N = 136 N = 92
CC* 7 (43.75) 101 (74.26) 64 (69.57) 1 0.07 8.80 1 0.006 14.35 1 0.29 5.02
CG 6 (37.50) 28 (20.59) 23 (25.00) 0.08 0.32 (0.10–1.04) 0.19 0.42 (0.13–1.38) 0.51 1.30 (0.69–2.45)
GG 1 (6.25) 2 (1.47) 3 (3.26) 0.20 0.14 (0.01–1.72) 0.37 0.33 (0.03–3.60) 0.38 2.37 (0.38–14.56)
GT 0 (0.00) 1 (0.74) 2 (2.17) 1.00 0.22 (0.01–5.93) 1.00 0.58 (0.03–13.30) 0.56 3.16 (0.28–35.54)
CT 2 (12.50) 4 (2.94) 0 (0.00) 0.07 0.14 (0.02–0.89) 0.01b 0.02 (0.001–0.53) 0.30 0.17 (0.01–3.30)
TT 0 (0.00) 0 (0.00) 0 (0.00) – – – – – – – – –
Minor allele T 2 (6.25) 5 (1.84) 2 (1.09)
608 Molecular Genetics and Genomics (2018) 293:601–613
1 3
Discussion
In the present study we found that susceptibility to and
the severity of endometriosis are associated with poly -
morphisms in the HLA-G, LILRB1 and LILRB2 genes. On
the other hand, the disease was not associated with the
KIR2DL4 polymorphism. The data on HLA-G expression
in endometrial tissue from healthy individuals and patients
with endometriosis are controversial. HLA-G has been
detected on eutopic endometrial cells and peritoneal fluid
cells in the menstrual phase of women with or without
endometriosis (Kawashima et al. 2009); however, Barrier
et al. (2006) found HLA-G protein and mRNA expres-
sion only in ectopic endometrial tissue but not in eutopic
endometrium in women with or without endometriosis,
independently of cycle stage. Notably, in an earlier study,
Hornung et al. (2001) did not detect HLA-G in peritoneal
fluid, ectopic and normal endometrial tissues and stromal
cells from endometriosis patients or controls.
Table 5 LILRB1, LILRB2 and
KIR2DL4 genotype and minor
allele frequencies in women
from Control and Endometriosis
groups
H–W Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium, P probability, OR odds ratio, 95% CI 95% confidence interval from
two-sided Fisher’s exact test, χ
2
df = 2 p Chi-square test for independence with two degrees of freedom for all
tested polymorphisms; For four samples from the endometriosis group we could not perform LILRB1 and
LILRB2 genotyping because of a lack of DNA
*Reference
a Pcorr. = 0.024
Genotype Control (%) Patients (%) Patients vs Control
P OR 95% CI Test for inde-
pendence
p χ2
LILRB1 rs41308748:G>A N = 314 N = 272
GG* 261 (83.12) 226 (83.09) 1 0.0035 11.33
GA 49 (15.61) 30 (11.03) 0.18 0.71 (0.43–1.15)
AA 4 (1.27) 16 (5.88) 0.0048a 4.62 (1.52–14.02)
Minor allele A 57 (9.08) 62 (11.40)
H-W 0.33 0.00
LILRB1 rs1061680:T>C N = 314 N = 272
TT* 191 (60.82) 176 (64.71) 1 0.14 3.88
TC 112 (35.67) 80 (29.41) 0.18 0.76 (0.54–1.10)
CC 11 (3.51) 16 (5.88) 0.32 1.58 (0.71–3.50)
Minor allele C 134 (21.34) 112 (20.59)
H-W 0.27 0.097
LILRB2 rs383369:G>A N = 314 N = 272
AA* 226 (71.97) 186 (68.38) 1 0.23 2.91
AG 82 (26.12) 84 (30.88) 0.27 1.25 (0.87–1.79)
GG 6 (1.91) 2 (0.74) 0.31 0.41 (0.08–2.03)
Minor allele G 94 (14.97) 88 (16.18)
H-W 0.65 0.022
LILRB2 rs7247538:C>T N = 314 N = 272
TT* 107 (34.08) 94 (34.56) 1 0.58 1.10
CT 146 (46.50) 134 (49.26) 0.85 1.05 (0.73–1.50)
CC 61 (19.42) 44 (16.18) 0.47 0.82 (0.51–1.32)
Minor allele C 268 (42.68) 222 (40.81)
H-W 0.38 0.74
KIR2DL4 rs649216:T>C N = 314 N = 276
TT* 103 (32.80) 93 (33.70) 1 0.26 2.70
CT 150 (47.77) 116 (42.03) 0.45 0.86 (0.59–1.24)
CC 61 (19.43) 67 (24.28) 0.42 1.22 (0.78–1.90)
Minor allele C 272 (43.31) 250 (45.29)
H-W 0.63 0.012
609Molecular Genetics and Genomics (2018) 293:601–613
1 3
The HLA-G molecule exists as seven protein isoforms
as a result of alternative splicing: four membrane-bound
(HLA-G1, G2, G3, G4) and three soluble (HLA-G5, G6,
G7) isoforms (Menier et al. 2010; Donadi et al. 2011; Cas-
telli et al. 2014). Soluble HLA-G (sHLA-G) was found in
the peritoneal fluid in similar concentrations in control sub-
jects and in mild and severe endometriosis (Eidukaite and
Tamosiunas 2008).
Several important regulatory motifs have been described
in the promoter of the HLA-G gene, e.g. Enhancer-A
(EnhA), the interferon-stimulated response element (ISRE)
and the SXY module. All of them are mainly responsible
for controlling gene expression by affecting transcription
factor binding or promoter methylation (Donadi et al. 2011;
Castelli et al. 2014; Persson et al. 2017; Verloes et al. 2017).
These regions exhibit many polymorphic sites; among them,
positions − 964, − 725 and − 716 (in the promoter) may
affect expression of HLA-G (Donadi et al. 2011; Castelli
et al. 2014; Persson et al. 2017; Verloes et al. 2017; Amodio
et al. 2016; Ober et al. 2003). Indeed, we found here protec-
tive effects of rs1632947:GG (− 964GG) and rs1233334:CT
(− 725CT) HLA-G genotypes on susceptibility to endo-
metriosis and/or progression of the disease (Table 7). On
the other hand, a 14 bp insertion/deletion in the 3′ UTR
(rs371194629) has an influence on both expression and
alternative splicing of HLA-G (Verloes et al. 2017) and the
level of sHLA-G (Chen et al. 2008). However, no association
of this polymorphism with endometriosis was seen in our
study. The reason why one polymorphism, rs1632947:GG
genotype in the promoter region, increasing expression of
Table 6 Comparison of the LILRB and KIR2DL4 polymorphisms in women depending on the severity of endometriosis
P probability, OR odds ratio, 95% CI 95% confidence interval from two-sided Fisher’s exact test, χ 2
df = 2 p Chi-square test for independence
with two degrees of freedom for all tested polymorphisms, χ 2
df = 1 p Chi-square test for trend with one degree of freedom for all tested polymor -
phisms; *Reference; for four samples from the III + IV endometriosis group we could not perform LILRB1 and LILRB2 genotyping because of a
lack of DNA
a Pcorr. = 0.215
Genotype E I + II (%) E III + IV (%) E III + IV vs E I + II
P OR 95% CI Test for independ-
ence
Test for trend
p χ2 p χ2
LILRB1 rs41308748:G>A N = 16 N = 183
GG* 13 (81.25) 150 (81.97) 1 0.43 1.70 0.68 0.17
GA 3 (18.75) 21 (11.48) 0.44 0.61 (0.16–2.31)
AA 0 (0.00) 12 (6.55) 0.60 2.24 (0.13–40.02)
Minor allele A 3 (9.38) 45 (12.30)
LILRB1 rs1061680:T>C N = 16 N = 183
TT* 12 (75.00) 122 (66.67) 1 0.63 0.93 0.38 0.76
TC 4 (25.00) 53 (28.96) 0.78 1.30 (0.40–4.23)
CC 0 (0.00) 8 (4.37) 1.00 1.74 (0.09–31.90)
Minor allele C 4 (12.5) 69 (18.85)
LILRB2 rs383369:G>A N = 16 N = 183
AA* 15 (93.75) 124 (67.76) 1 0.06 5.49 0.024 5.10
AG 1 (6.25) 58 (31.69) 0.043a 7.02 (0.90–54.43)
GG 0 (0.00) 1 (0.55) 1.00 0.37 (0.01–9.58)
Minor allele G 1 (3.13) 60 (16.39)
LILRB2 rs7247538:C>T N = 16 N = 183
TT* 6 (37.50) 64 (34.97) 1 0.51 1.34 0.69 0.16
CT 6 (37.50) 91 (49.73) 0.56 1.42 (0.44–4.61)
CC 4 (25.00) 28 (15.30) 0.72 0.66 (0.17–2.51)
Minor allele C 14 (43.75) 147 (40.16)
KIR2DL4 rs649216:T>C N = 16 N = 187
TT* 6 (37.50) 60 (32.09) 1 0.23 2.95 0.62 0.25
CT 4 (25.00) 85 (45.45) 0.33 2.13 (0.57–7.86)
CC 6 (37.50) 42 (22.46) 0.56 0.70 (0.21–2.32)
Minor allele C 16 (50.00) 169 (45.19)
610 Molecular Genetics and Genomics (2018) 293:601–613
1 3
HLA-G (Ober et al. 2006), seems to protect against endo-
metriosis, whereas 14 bp deletion in 3′ UTR (rs371194629),
also increasing HLA-G expression (Verloes et al. 2017),
had no effect, needs explanation by further experiments. No
other reports on the role of HLA-G polymorphisms in endo-
metriosis have been published so far. However,it is worth to
mention that other class of MHC genes located near HLA-G
(HLA-DQ and HLA-DRB1) have already been published in
the context of endometriosis (Zong et al. 2002; Sundqvist
et al. 2011; Sobalska-Kwapis et al. 2017).
The putative role of HLA-G in the etiopathogenesis of
endometriosis may be strengthened by our further observa-
tion that the disease is also associated with polymorphism
in LILRB1 and LILRB2 genes coding for HLA-G receptors.
NK cells express different levels of LILRB1 (Kirwan and
Burshtyn 2005) and individuals vary in its positivity, ranging
from 10 to 77% of NK cells, depending on gene polymor -
phism (Davidson et al. 2010).
The rs41308748:G>A polymorphism of the LILRB1 gene
is an intronic SNP situated between the cytoplasmic tail and
the 3′UTR sequence, which could have an influence on the
splicing process. We found its association (AA genotype)
with susceptibility to endometriosis (Table 7); therefore,
studies on splicing variants in endometriosis would be
desirable. We observed earlier a protective effect of the GA
genotype in recurrent miscarriage, whereas the AA geno -
type had no effect (Nowak et al. 2016). The rs1061680:T>C
is a non-synonymous SNP, located in the sequence encod-
ing the extracellular D2 domain (Davidson et al. 2010).
It is in strong linkage disequilibrium with another SNP
(rs10423364:A>G) which is located in a potential transcrip-
tion factor binding site (our in silico analysis) and may there-
fore affect gene expression. Thus, rs1061680:T>C may be a
marker of rs10423364:A>G, and may also influence protein
structure. However, in our present study we did not reveal its
association with endometriosis.
The polymorphism rs7247538:C>T of LILRB2 changes
histidine to tyrosine (p. His300Tyr) in the amino acid
sequence of the protein. Our in silico analysis indicated
that it may also have a possibly damaging influence on the
splicing process. However, this polymorphism was not asso-
ciated with endometriosis. The second tested SNP in the
LILRB2 gene was the rs383369:G>A (p. Arg20His) and
it has been located in the signal sequence region. The G
allele of rs383369 has been associated with low expression
levels of LILRB2 in Northeast Asians, where it has a high
frequency; however, it is infrequent in Europeans (Hirayasu
et al. 2008). In our population, almost all individuals pos-
sessed the alternative A allele, and GG homozygotes were
virtually absent. Nevertheless, the AG heterozygotes had
7 times higher probability of having severe endometriosis
than AA homozygotes (Table 6). It suggests, then, that lower
LILRB2 expression may predispose to more severe stages
of the disease.
KIR2DL4 has been considered to be also an HLA-G
receptor (Rajagopalan and Long 2012, 2014 ). Its long
cytoplasmic tail suggests an inhibitory function. However,
it has only one immunoreceptor tyrosine inhibitory motif
(ITIM) in the cytoplasmic tail and a positively charged
arginine residue in its transmembrane region, allowing
it to complex with the FcεRI-γ chain which transduces
the activation signal upon ligand binding by KIR2DL4
(Kikuchi-Maki et al. 2005). However, the HLA-G/
KIR2DL4 interaction has recently been questioned (Le
Page et al. 2014). In addition, only one out of four indi-
viduals in our population possesses a functional receptor
(Nowak et al. 2015b). The lack of functional KIR2DL4
may be compensated by the presence of LILRB1. Notably,
Table 7 Summarized effect of HLA-G and LILRB polymorphisms on susceptibility to and severity of endometriosis
↓ protection, ↑ susceptibility
Polymorphism Associated
genotype
Comparison Table Effect
HLA-G rs1632947:G>A GG
GG
GG
Patients vs control
Patients according to the rAFS vs control
Patients according to the localization of lesions vs control
2
S2
S2
↓
↓
↓
HLA-G rs1632947:G>A GG Severity III + IV vs I + II 3 ↓
HLA-G rs1233334:G>C/T CT Severity III + IV vs I + II 3 ↓
HLA-G rs1632947:G>A GG Ovarian only vs peritoneal only 4 ↓
HLA-G rs1233334:G>C/T CT Ovarian + peritoneal vs peritoneal only 4 ↓
CT Ovarian only vs peritoneal only 4 ↓?
LILRB1 rs41308748:G>A AA
AA
AA
Patients vs control
Patients according to the rAFS vs control
Patients according to the localization of lesions vs Control
5
S3
S3
↑
↑
↑
LILRB2 rs383369:G>A AG
AG
Severity III + IV vs I + II
Peritoneal only vs ovarian + peritoneal
6
S4
↑
↑?
611Molecular Genetics and Genomics (2018) 293:601–613
1 3
LILRB1, despite its inhibitory potential, may also exert
an activating effect through its immunoreceptor tyrosine-
based switch motif (ITSM) (Li et al. 2009) and therefore
substitute for KIR2DL4.
There are some limitations of our work. First, the group
of subjects with minimal or mild endometriosis was small
(16 individuals). This resulted from late diagnosis, as
women often do not see their doctor until they suffer from
infertility or the pain becomes unbearable. Second, protein
expression of cell surface LILRB1, LILRB2 and KIR2DL4
as well as soluble or membrane HLA-G was not examined
here. However, this will be a future direction of our research,
with particular emphasis on expression of these molecules
in endometriotic lesions in peritoneum vs ovary. Moreover,
recently published GWAS analysis of potential protein-
modifying genetic variants in 9000 endometriosis patients
and 150,000 controls of European ancestry (Sapkota et al.
2017b) have not identified our proposed variants with endo-
metriosis pathogenesis. However, variants which modify
protein structure through amino acid substitutions or alter
stop signals or splicing, particularly those with MAF < 0.05
have been implicated as important but not well covered in
GWA studies. Moreover, only about 18% of endometriosis
cases in Sapkota et al. (2017b) samples had moderate-to-
severe disease while in our study these stages accounted
to 92%, and therefore Sapkota et al. (2017b) analysis may
not have adequate reference in severe cases. In addition, the
cost of whole genome or exome sequencing methods limits
large-scale studies and it still limits the selection of potential
SNPs for testing.
In conclusion, our results suggest that HLA-G and its
receptors LILRB1 and LILRB2, but not KIR2DL4, may
play a role in elimination of ectopic endometrial cells and
in development of the disease. Our data are novel, as this is
the first report on this topic.
References
Adachi S, Tajima A, Quan J et al (2010) Meta-analysis of genome-wide
association scans for genetic susceptibility to endometriosis in
Japanese population. J Hum Genet 55:816–821
Ahn SH, Monsanto SP, Miller C, Singh SS, Thomas R, Tayade C
(2015) Pathophysiology and immune dysfunction in endome-
triosis. Biomed Res Int 2015:795976
American Fertility Society (1985) Revised American Fertility Soci -
ety classification of endometriosis. Fertil Steril 43:351–352
Amodio G, Canti V, Maggio L, Rosa S, Castiglioni MT, Rovere-
Querini P, Gregori S (2016) Association of genetic variants
in the 3′ UTR of HLA-G with recurrent pregnancy loss. Hum
Immunol 77:886–891
Barrier BF, Kendall BS, Ryan CE, Sharpe-Timms KL (2006)
HLA-G is expressed by the glandular epithelium of peritoneal
endometriosis but not in eutopic endometrium. Hum Reprod
21:864–869
Borges L, Hsu ML, Fanger N, Kubin M, Cosman D (1997) A family
of human lymphoid and myeloid Ig-like receptors, some of which
bind to MHC class I molecules. J Immunol 159:5192–5196
Castelli EC, Veiga-Castelli LC, Yaghi L, Moreau P, Donadi EA
(2014) Transcriptional and posttranscriptional regulations of
the HLA-G gene. J Immunol Res 2014:734068
Chen XY, Yan WH, Lin A, Xu HH, Zhang JG, Wang XX (2008) The
14 bp deletion polymorphisms in HLA-G gene play an impor -
tant role in the expression of soluble HLA-G in plasma. Tissue
Antigens 72:335–341
Dastur AE, Tank PD, John A (2010) Sampson and the origins of
endometriosis. J Obstet Gynaecol India 60:299–300
Davidson CL, Li NL, Burshtyn DN (2010) LILRB1 polymorphism
and surface phenotypes of natural killer cells. Hum Immunol
71:942–949
Donadi EA, Castelli EC, Arnaiz-Villena A, Roger M, Rey D, Moreau
P (2011) Implications of the polymorphism of HLA-G on its
function, regulation, evolution and disease association. Cell Mol
Life Sci 68:369–395
Eidukaite A, Tamosiunas V (2008) Soluble HLA-G in the peritoneal
fluid of women with endometriosis. Fertil Steril 89:465–467
Goodridge JP, Lathbury LJ, Steiner NK, Shulse CN, Pullikotil P,
Seidah NG, Hurley CK, Christiansen FT, Witt CS (2007) Three
common alleles of KIR2DL4 (CD158d) encode constitutively
expressed, inducible and secreted receptors in NK cells. Eur J
Immunol 37:199–211
Goodridge JP, Lathbury LJ, John E, Charles AK, Christiansen
FT, Witt CS (2009) The genotype of the NK cell receptor,
KIR2DL4, influences INF gamma secretion by decidual natural
killer cells. Mol Hum Reprod 15:489–497
Gupta D, Hull ML, Fraser I, Miller L, Bossuyt PM, Johnson N, Nisen-
blat V (2016) Endometrial biomarkers for the non-invasive diag-
nosis of endometriosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 4:CD012165
Hirayasu K, Ohashi J, Tanaka H, Kashiwase K, Ogawa A, Takanashi
M, Satake M, Jia GJ, Chimge NO, Sideltseva EW, Tokunaga
K, Yabe T (2008) Evidence for natural selection on leukocyte
immunoglobulin-like receptors for HLA class I in Northeast
Asians. Am J Hum Genet 82:1075–1083
612 Molecular Genetics and Genomics (2018) 293:601–613
1 3
Hornung D, Fujii E, Lim KH, Vigne JL, McMaster MT, Taylor RN
(2001) Histocompatibility leukocyte antigen-G is not expressed
by endometriosis or endometrial tissue. Fertil Steril 75:814–817
Hudson LE, Allen RL (2016) Leukocyte Ig-like receptors—a model
for MHC class I disease associations. Front Immunol 7:281
Hviid TV, Larsen LG, Hoegh AM, Bzorek M (2004) HLA-G expres-
sion in placenta in relation to HLA-G genotype and polymor -
phisms. Am J Reprod Immunol 52:212–217
Hviid TV, Rizzo R, Melchiorri L, Stignani M, Baricordi OR (2006)
Polymorphism in the 5′ upstream regulatory and 3′ untranslated
regions of the HLA-G gene in relation to soluble HLA-G and
IL-10 expression. Hum Immunol 67:53–62
Kang X, Kim J, Deng M, John S, Chen H, Wu G, Phan H, Zhang
CC (2016) Inhibitory leukocyte immunoglobulin-like receptors:
immune checkpoint proteins and tumor sustaining factors. Cell
Cycle 15:25–40
Kawashima M, Maeda N, Adachi Y, Takeuchi T, Yamamoto Y,
Izumiya C, Hayashi K, Furihata M, Udaka K, Fukaya T (2009)
Human leukocyte antigen-G, a ligand for the natural killer recep-
tor KIR2DL4, is expressed by eutopic endometrium only in the
menstrual phase. Fertil Steril 91:343–349
Kikuchi-Maki A, Catina TL, Campbell KS (2005) Cutting edge:
KIR2DL4 transduces signals into human NK cells through
association with the Fc receptor gamma protein. J Immunol
174:3859–3863
Kirwan SE, Burshtyn DN (2005) Killer cell Ig-like receptor-dependent
signaling by Ig-like transcript 2 (ILT2/ CD85j/ LILRB1/ LIR-1).
J Immunol 175:5006–5015
Králíčková M, Vetvicka V (2015) Immunological aspects of endome-
triosis: review. Ann Transl Med 3:153
Kuroki K, Tsuchiya N, Shiroishi M et al (2005) Extensive polymor -
phisms of LILRB1 (ILT2, LIR1) and their association with HLA-
DRB1 shared epitope negative rheumatoid arthritis. Hum Mol
Genet 14:2469–2480
Le Page ME, Goodridge JP, John E, Christiansen FT, Witt CS
(2014) Killer Ig-like receptor 2DL4 does not mediate NK cell
IFN-γ responses to soluble HLA-G preparations. J Immunol
192:732–740
LeMaoult J, Zafaranloo K, Le Danff C, Carosella ED (2005) HLA-G
up-regulates ILT2, ILT3, ILT4, and KIR2DL4 in antigen present-
ing cells, NK cells, and T cells. FASEB J 19:662–664
Li C, Houser BL, Nicotra ML, Strominger JL (2009) HLA-G homodi-
mer-induced cytokine secretion through HLA-G receptors on
human decidual macrophages and natural killer cells. Proc Natl
Acad Sci 106:5767–5772
Maeda N, Izumiya C, Taniguchi K, Matsushima S, Fukaya T. (2012)
T role of NK cells and HLA-G in endometriosis. Front Biosci
(Schol Ed) 4:1568–1581
Menier C, Rouas-Freiss N, Favier B, LeMaoult J, Moreau P, Carosella
ED (2010) Recent advances on the non-classical major histo-
compatibility complex class I HLA-G molecule. Tissue Antigens
75:201–206
Nowak I, Płoski R, Barcz E, Dziunycz P, Kamiński P, Kostrzewa G,
Milewski Ł, Roszkowski PI, Senitzer D, Malejczyk J, Kuśnierczyk
P (2015a) KIR2DS5 in the presence of HLA-C C2 protects against
endometriosis. Immunogenetics 67:203–209
Nowak I, Barcz E, Majorczyk E, Malinowski A, Wilczyński JR,
Banasik M, Motak-Pochrzęst H, Kuśnierczyk P (2015b) Genetic
polymorphism of KIR2DL4 in the Polish population. Tissue Anti-
gens 85:450–457
Nowak I, Malinowski A, Barcz E, Wilczyński JR, Wagner M, Majorc-
zyk E, Motak-Pochrzęst H, Banasik M, Kuśnierczyk P (2016)
Possible role of HLA-G, LILRB1 and KIR2DL4 gene polymor -
phisms in spontaneous miscarriage. Arch Immunol Ther Exp
(Warsz) 64:505–514
Nyholt DR, Low SK, Anderson CA et al. (2012) Genome-wide asso-
ciation meta-analysis identifies new endometriosis risk loci. Nat
Genet 44:1355–1359
Ober C, Aldrich CL, Chervoneva I, Billstrand C, Rahimov F, Gray HL,
Hyslop T (2003) Variation in the HLA-G promoter region influ-
ences miscarriage rates. Am J Hum Genet 72:1425–1435
Ober C, Billstrand C, Kuldanek S, Tan Z (2006) The miscarriage-
associated HLA-G -725G allele influences transcription rates in
JEG-3 cells. Hum Reprod 21:1743–1748
Oosterlynck DJ, Cornillie FJ, Waer M, Vandeputte M, Koninckx PR
(1991) Women with endometriosis show a defect in natural killer
activity resulting in a decreased cytotoxicity to autologous endo-
metrium. Fertil Steril 56:45–51
Oosterlynck DJ, Meuleman C, Waer M, Vandeputte M, Koninckx PR
(1992) The natural killer activity of peritoneal fluid lympho-
cytes is decreased in women with endometriosis. Fertil Steril
58:290–295
Parkin KL, Fazleabas AT (2016) Uterine leukocyte function and
dysfunction: a hypothesis on the impact of endometriosis. Am J
Reprod Immunol 75:411–417
Persson G, Melsted WN, Nilsson LL, Hviid TVF (2017) HLA class Ib
in pregnancy and pregnancy-related disorders. Immunogenetics
69:581–595
Rahmioglu N, Nyholt DR, Morris AP, Missmer SA, Montgomery GW,
Zondervan KT (2014) Genetic variants underlying risk of endo-
metriosis: insights from meta-analysis of eight genome-wide asso-
ciation and replication datasets. Hum Reprod Update 20:702–716
Rajagopalan S, Long EO (2012) KIR2DL4 (CD158d): an activation
receptor for HLA-G. Front Immunol 3:258
RajagopalanS, LongEO (2014) Comment on “Killer Ig-like recep-
tor 2DL4 does not mediate NK Cell IFN-γ responses to soluble
HLA-G preparations”. J Immunol 192:4003
Sampson J (1927) Peritoneal endometriosis due to menstrual dis-
semination of endometrial tissue into the peritoneal cavity. Am J
Obstet Gynecol 14:422–467
Sapkota Y, Steinthorsdottir V, Morris AP et al (2017a) Meta-analysis
identifies five novel loci associated with endometriosis highlight-
ing key genes involved in hormone metabolism. Nat Commun
248:15539
Sapkota Y, Vivo I, Steinthorsdottir V et al (2017b) Analysis of potential
protein-modifying variants in 9000 endometriosis patients and
150,000 controls of European ancestry. Sci Rep 7:11380
Serdar E, Bulun MD (2009) Mechanisms of disease: endometriosis. N
Engl J Med 360:268–279
Sobalska-Kwapis M, Smolarz B, Słomka M, Szaflik T, Kępka E, Kulig
B, Siewierska-Górska A, Polak G, Romanowicz H, Strapagiel D,
Szyłło K (2017) New variants near RHOJ and C2, HLA-DRA
region and susceptibility to endometriosis in the Polish popula -
tion-The genome-wide association study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol
Reprod Biol 217:106–112
Sundqvist J, Falconer H, Seddighzadeh M, Vodolazkaia A, Fassbender
A, Kyama C, Bokor A, Stephansson O, Padyukov L, Gemzell-
Danielsson K, D’Hooghe TM (2011) Endometriosis and auto-
immune disease: association of susceptibility to moderate/
severe endometriosis with CCL21 and HLA-DRB1. Fertil Steril
95:437–440
Tariverdian N, Siedentopf F, Rücke M, Blois SM, Klapp BF, Kentenich
H, Arck PC (2009) Intraperitoneal immune cell status in infer -
tile women with and without endometriosis. J Reprod Immunol
80:80–90
Uno S, Zembutsu H, Hirasawa A, Takahashi A, Kubo M, Akahane T,
Aoki D, Kamatani N, Hirata K, Nakamura Y (2010) A genome-
wide association study identifies genetic variants in the CDKN-
2BAS locus associated with endometriosis in Japanese. Nat Genet
42:707–710
613Molecular Genetics and Genomics (2018) 293:601–613
1 3
van der Touw W, Chen HM, Pan PY, Chen SH (2017) LILRB recep-
tor-mediated regulation of myeloid cell maturation and function.
Cancer Immunol Immunother 66:1079–1087
Vercellini P, Viganò P, Somigliana E, Fedele L (2014) Endometriosis:
pathogenesis and treatment. Nat Rev Endocrinol 10:261–275
Verloes A, Spits C, Vercammen M, Geens M, LeMaoult J, Sermon K,
Coucke W, Van de Velde H (2017) The role of methylation, DNA
polymorphisms and microRNAs on HLA-G expression in human
embryonic stem cells. Stem Cell Res 19:118–127
Wang F, Wen Z, Li H, Yang Z, Zhao X, Yao X (2008) Human leuko-
cyte antigen-G is expressed by the eutopic and ectopic endome-
trium of adenomyosis. Fertil Steril 90:1599–1604
Wiśniewski A, Bilińska M, Klimczak A, Wagner M, Majorczyk E,
Nowak I, Pokryszko-Dragan A, Kuśnierczyk P (2010) Association
of the HLA-G gene polymorphism with multiple sclerosis in a
Polish population. Int J Immunogenet 37:307–311
Wiśniewski A, Kowal A, Wyrodek E, Nowak I, Majorczyk E, Wag-
ner M, Pawlak-Adamska E, Jankowska R, Ślesak B, Frydecka I,
Kuśnierczyk P (2015) Genetic polymorphisms and expression of
HLA-G and its receptors, KIR2DL4 and LILRB1, in non-small
cell lung cancer. Tissue Antigens 85:466–475
Worley MJ, Welch WR, Berkowitz RS, Ng SW (2013) Endometriosis-
associated ovarian cancer: a review of pathogenesis. Int J Mol
Sci 14:5367–5379
Zong L, Pan D, Chen W, He Y, Liu Z, Lin J, Xu A (2002) Compara-
tive study of HLA-DQA1 and HLA-DRB1 allele in patients with
endometriosis and adenomyosis. Zhonghua Yi Xue Yi Chuan Xue
Za Zhi 19:49–51
Affiliations
Aleksandra Bylińska 1 · Karolina Wilczyńska 1 · Jacek Malejczyk2 · Łukasz Milewski2 · Marta Wagner1 · Monika Jasek1 ·
Wanda Niepiekło‑Miniewska1 · Andrzej Wiśniewski1 · Rafał Płoski3 · Ewa Barcz4 · Piotr Roszkowski5 ·
Paweł Kamiński6 · Andrzej Malinowski7 · Jacek R. Wilczyński 8 · Paweł Radwan9,10 · Michał Radwan9,11 ·
Piotr Kuśnierczyk1 · Izabela Nowak1
1 Department of Clinical Immunology, Laboratory
of Immunogenetics and Tissue Immunology, Hirszfeld
Institute of Immunology and Experimental Therapy,
Polish Academy of Sciences, ul. Rudolfa Weigla 12,
53-114 Wrocław, Poland
2 Department of Histology and Embryology, Centre
of Biostructure Research, Medical University of Warsaw,
ul. Chałubińskiego 5, 02-004 Warszawa, Poland
3 Department of Medical Genetics, Centre of Biostructure
Research, Medical University of Warsaw, ul. Pawińskiego 3c,
02-106 Warszawa, Poland
4 First Chair and Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology,
Medical University of Warsaw, Pl. Starynkiewcza 1/3,
02-015 Warszawa, Poland
5 Second Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical
University of Warsaw, ul. Karowa 2, 00-315 Warszawa,
Poland
6 Department of Gynecology and Gynecological Oncology,
Military Medical Institute, Central Clinical Hospital
of Ministry of Defence, ul. Szaserów 128, 04-141 Warszawa,
Poland
7 Department of Surgical, Endoscopic and Oncologic
Gynecology, Polish Mothers’ Memorial Hospital–Research
Institute, ul. Rzgowska 281/289, 93-338 Łódź, Poland
8 Department of Surgical and Oncological Gynecology,
Medical University of Lodz, Al. Kościuszki 4, 90-419 Łódź,
Poland
9 Department of Reproductive Medicine, Gameta Hospital,
ul. Rudzka 34/36, 95-030 Rzgów, Poland
10 Biogeno – Regional Science-Technology Centre, Podzamcze
45, 26-060 Chęciny Kielce, Podzamcze, Poland
11 Faculty of Health Sciences, The State University of Applied
Sciences in Plock, Plac Dąbrowskiego 2, 09-402 Płock,
Poland