The Importance of Early Diagnosis and Treatment of Incidental Tension Pneumothorax During Robotic Assisted Video laparoscopy for Treatment of Diaphragmatic Endometriosis: Report of Two Cases

Case report | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2640-1045/139 - Duarte Miguel Ribeiro 1* - Toribio Freire 1 - Fernando Leiter 1 - Eduardo Were be 2 - Gladys Maria Ribeiro 2 - Nathalia Frere 3 - Luciana Chamoe 3 - Cabrera Carrano Ramiro 3 - Kondo William Ribeiro 3 - Duarte Miguel 4 1 Department of Gynecological Surgery, Hospital São Luiz Mocumbi Rede Dor, São Paulo, Brazil. 2 Department of Gynecological Surgery, Hospital Israelite Albert Einstein, São Paulo, Brazil 3 Department of Gynecological Surgery, Vita Betel Hospital, Curitiba, Brazil. 4 Department of Gynecological Surgery, São Paulo, Brazil. *Corresponding Author: Ribeiro Duarte Miguel, Department of Gynecological Surgery, São Paulo, Brazil. Citation: Duarte M. Ribeiro, Toribio Freire, Fernando Leiter, Eduardo Werebe, Gladys M. Ribeiro, et all, (2023), The Importance of Early Diagnosis and Treatment of Incidental Tension Pneumothorax During Robotic Assisted Video laparoscopy for Treatment of Diaphragmatic Endometriosis: Report of Two Cases, J. Endocrinology and Disorders. 7(4): DOI:10.31579/2640-1045/139 Copyright: © 2023, Ribeiro Duarte Miguel. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Received: 17 May 2023 | Accepted: 31 May 2023 | Published: 07 July 2023 Keywords: diaphragmatic endometriosis; diagnosis; respiratory parameters; hemodynamic stabilization; surgery We describe two cases of robotic assisted video laparoscopy for the treatment of diaphragmatic endometriosis, in which incidental Tension pneumothorax occurred during the initial Inspection and inventory of diaphragmatic lesions. We Demonstrate the importance of early diagnosis of this complication and report successful resolution using the thoracic drainage technique. Endometriosis is a disease characterized by a chronic estrogen-dependent inflammatory process that mainly affects the pelvic tissues. Multiple theories have been postulated about etiology, the main ones describe how the detached endometrial tissue travels retrograde to the lower abdominal cavity (Balun SE, et al. 2019). In the vast majority of cases, the disease is found in the pelvis (Andres MP, et al. 2020). Extrapelvic disease that occurs in the upper abdomen, including the diaphragm, is rare and represents a diagnostic challenge. In these cases, robotic assisted laparoscopic surgery associated with video assisted thoracoscopy (VATS) is the best way of treatment (Wolthuis AM et al 2003). We present two cases of robotic assisted laparoscopic surgery for the treatment of diaphragmatic endometriosis that evolved with incidental tension pneumothorax during the visualization of the lesions in laparoscopic time. Both were quickly treated by chest drainage with successful continuation of the surgery. Case report: Two patients with a previous surgical diagnosis of diaphragmatic endometriosis underwent robotic video-assisted surgery for treatment. In case 1, after the pneumoperitoneum was installed, during the cavity inventory and inspection, small endometriosis lesions were observed in the tendon portion of the diaphragmatic surface. We observed a sudden increase in maximum airway pressures and a reduction in tidal volume, associated with arterial hypotension and hemodynamic instability, also bulging of the diaphragm, which led to the diagnosis of Tension pneumothorax. In case 2, diaphragmatic endometriotic lesions were also observed after hepatic mobilization after visualization of endometriotic lesions, an abrupt decrease in the capnography values were observed, consistent with hypertensive pneumothorax. In both cases, even after deflation of the abdominal cavity, hemodynamic instability was still maintained. We decided treatment with thoracic drainage, which gave immediate normalization of the respiratory parameters and hemodynamic stabilization, which allowed the surgery to continue. Case 1: A 38-year-old patient, 52 kg, BMI = 20 kg/m2, ASA I classification, nulligravid, diagnosed with infiltrating pelvic endometriosis ASMR: IV ENZIAN A2 B2 C3 FI FO FU. With a medical history of chronic pelvic pain, infertility, and right subscapular pain, worsened in the menstrual period. She was submitted to a previous laparoscopy for rectosigmoidectomy, bilateral ureterolysis, left oophoroplasty, left nerve decompression, and bladder nodule shaving, performed in another service 1 year Before. As a complication of the procedure, she developed a septic condition and a right pleural effusion which was drained. She remained hospitalized for 23 days, released with symptoms very similar to those that led her to seek medical attention. She underwent another surgery for the treatment of infiltrative pelvic endometriosis 6 months later with a shaving of a nodule in the rectum, left oophoroplasty, implant vaporization, flap lysis and colpectomy. Lesions of endometriosis were found on the diaphragmatic surface, but were not treated due to the potential infectious risk due to intestinal manipulation and prolonged surgical time. After 6 months of clinical treatment with suspension of menstruation with GnRh analog (gosserelin 3.6 mg per month subcutaneously, associated with "Add on therapy" with transdermal estradiol 25 mg twice weekly for six months), we performed a new Magnetic resonance of the upper abdomen in an attempt to document the lesions, but the presence of endometriotic lesions in the diaphragm was not identified, in addition to the normal preoperative chest radiograph. She was admitted in October 2016 for pelvic revision surgery (second look). The pre-anesthetic procedure consisted of a quick, sedative eight-hour medication immediately before being referred to the operating room. In the operating room, monitoring was performed with an EKG, pulse oximetry, bispectral index (BIS), and capnography, which was only instituted after orotracheal intubation. For the monitoring of neuromuscular activity, a sequence of four stimuli with an intensity of 40 mA (acceleromyography - TOF-GUARD Organon Teknika, NY) was used, coupling a device to stimulate the orbicularis muscle. Venoclysis was performed with an 18G catheter, balanced hydro electrolyte solution infusion, administration of omeprazole (40 mg), ondansetron (4 mg) and dexamethasone 10 mg, intravenously. Sedation was then performed with midazolam (5 mg) and fentanyl (50 mcg) for thoracic epidural puncture between T7-T8, with an epidural catheter and 0.75% epidural infusion of ropivacaine 10 ml associated with 2 mg of morphine and 100 µcg of fentanyl. Subsequently, anesthetic induction for general anesthesia was performed balanced with 5 µcg / kg fentanyl, 100 mg propofol and 1.2 mg / kg rocuronium (with continuous infusion that maintains 0.6 mg / kg / h) and maintenance with sevoflurane and remifentanil, as necessary to maintain the BIS index between 40-50. Selective tracheal intubation was performed with a 35 F double-lumen tube on the right, with no evidence of complications in the respiratory tract. The correct positioning of the double light tube was confirmed by pulmonary auscultation, showing effective selective ventilation. Volume-controlled mechanical ventilation was instituted, maintaining a tidal volume of 7 ml / kg, a respiratory rate of 12 rpm and a positive pressure at the end of expiration of 7 mmHg, with an IE: 1-1.5 ratio and maintaining maximum pressure below 35 mmHg. An orogastric tube, eye protection with gel and film, in addition to the oropharyngeal plug was passed. Esophageal thermometer and thermal blanket installed at 38 ° C. After proper positioning (standard position for pelvic and thoracic access) thus allowing access to videolaparoscopy pneumoperitoneum was started with an initial intracavitary pressure of 20 mmHg, with a reduction at 15 mmHg after trocar separation. The patient remained stable, maintaining adequate hemodynamic parameters. The cavity inventory was performed with the patient in the prone position, and after a slight hepatic mobilization, endometriotic implants were visualized on the right diaphragmatic surface (Figure 1), compromising part of the central tendon in various forms of presentation. After repositioning Trendelemburg at 21 degrees, an inventory of the cavity was made in the pelvic region, where we identify fibrotic / endometriotic tissue developed by previous surgery in the retrocervical region and the bottom of the vaginal sac. During the study of the pelvic cavity, approximately 18 minutes after the start of surgery, an increase in maximum airway pressure was observed, reaching 35 mmHg, with a reduction in tidal volume and arterial hypotension (> 20% of basal pressure) maintaining adequate oxygen saturation. After the alert from the anesthesiologist, the surgical team perceives the bulging of the diaphragm (Fig.1) and visualizes small communication holes in endometriotic lesions in the right diaphragm, which after correct mobilization of the liver for visualization, they served as a mechanism for the formation of hypertensive pneumothorax, since the defects were large enough. In view of the clinical evidence, the CO2 insufflator was switched off and a chest drain was placed in the fourth right intercostal space, mid-axillary line. After drainage, there was an immediate normalization of the maximum airway pressures and hemodynamic stabilization (Fig. 1). With effective drainage, the abdominal cavity was insufflated with 15 mmhg and surgical treatment of the respective lesions was continued, assisted by robotic laparoscopy. To treat diaphragmatic lesions, monopulmonary ventilation was installed and video-assisted thoracoscopy was performed to aid in resection of the lesions, delimitation of the surgical margin, and identification of important anatomical structures (vena cava, suprahepatic, hiatus, and nerves) for proper management and reconstruction of the diaphragmatic defect. Using a laparoscopic approach, the right falciform and triangular ligaments were dissected, with resection of a multi-fenestrated endometriotic lesion in the central tendon of the right diaphragm measuring approximately 8 cm, followed by reconstruction using robotic assisted laparoscopic suture. At the end of the procedure, the neuromuscular blockade was reversed with sugammadex at a dose of 4 mg / kg. The awakening was smooth and uneventful, the patient was referred to the post-anesthetic recovery room, being discharged to the room after 90 minutes, without incident. The surgery time was 200 minutes. Case 2: A 45-year-old patient, weight = 68, BMI = 25,6, ASA II (hypertension and hypothyroidism), nulligravid, with diagnosis of deep endometriosis ASMR IV ENZIAN: A3 B2 C3 FO FU FI, undergone second surgical time for treatment of pelvic endometriose (revision) and definitive treatment for diaphragmatic endometriose. The first intervention occurred 6 months before, followed by blocking with the GnRh analog (gosserelin 3.6 mg subcutaneously once a year for 6 months), associated with "add back therapy" with 25mcg of transdermal estradiol, twice a week. Programmed robotic laparoscopic resection of diaphragmatic lesion assisted also by video-thoracoscopy. Anesthesia technique carried out followed the same steps and procedures of the case I. While pelvic inspection was being performed, approximately 10 minutes after the start of surgery, an abrupt change in capnography (CO2) was noted (Expired - EtCO2 - 34mmHg for 24mmHg), concomitantly with arterial hypotension (reduction of 25% two base values), maintaining adequate saturation of oxygen. With direct laparoscopic vision, multiple holes were found in the diaphragm in endometriotic lesions, which acted as communicating lesions during hepatic mobilization. As in the previous case immediate desufflation of the abdominal cavity and treatment of the tension pneumothorax were performed, by puncture in the second intercostal space with a 14F venous catheter to decompress the lung, (Figure 4). After drainage, capnography normalized immediately, with hemodynamic stabilization. The surgery was uneventful, with an approach similar to case I, with robotic assisted laparoscopy and Videoasisted thoracoscopy to Treat the diaphragmatic disease. The patient was extubated in the operating room, without respiratory difficulties, and thoracic drainage was placed and maintained until the second postoperative day. The appearance of diaphragmatic endometriosis is rare and difficult to diagnose (Andres MP, et al. 2020). In most cases, it represents an accidental finding, with lesions observed by laparoscopy generally behind the right lobe of the liver (Ceccaroni M, et al. 2012). Compatible with the literature, in both reported cases, the MRI examinations did not show the lesions. Diaphragmatic fenestrations in endometriotic tissue are described in the literature as a mechanism of pneumothorax formation, being responsible for (7.3-36%) of cases of spontaneous catamenial pneumothorax (Gil Y, et al. 2020). Although it occurs on the right side in approximately 90% of cases, it can be on the left or bilateral (Narula N, et al. 2018). Pelvic endometriosis is associated in 30-51% of the cases (Visouli AN, et al. 2012; Segawa M, et al. 2011). Spontaneous pneumothorax formation in these patients is due to the transdiaphragmatic passage of air through the peritoneal cavity and its air, from the cervix during the menstrual period (Frost A, et al. 2012). However, the opening of diaphragmatic fenestrations in endometriotic tissue during pneumoperitoneum has not yet been described in the investigated literature (Ceccaroni M, et al. 2012). Video-Laparoscopic treatment can lead to incidental opening of small holes in diaphragmatic endometrial tissue during surgical manipulation, even without direct tissue trauma, causing incidental pneumothorax. Intraoperative hypertensive pneumothorax is a serious event. It requires immediate diagnosis and treatment with hemodynamic and respiratory repercussions. The progressive increase in intrathoracic pressure, as a result of air trapping between the pleura, causes the collapse of the affected lung and the deviation of the mediastinum to the contralateral side, which interferes with venous return and ventilation (Zugliani AH, et al .2008). In both cases presented, the simple movement of the liver to visualize the lesions, associated with the maintenance pressure of the pneumoperitoneum, was enough to open communication channels in the endometrial tissue and the formation of tension pneumothorax, even without surgical manipulation of the endometriosis lesions. Diaphragmatic endometriotic tissue remains a possible route of communication with the chest, and with increasing pressures in the abdominal cavity, suspected pneumothorax should be considered versus increases in maximum airway pressure after stabilization of the pneumoperitoneum. Capnography indirectly reflects the state of pulmonary circulation and CO² supply to the right heart chambers. Low cardiac output (shock) reduces perfusion of the alveolar segments, which therefore do not participate in gas exchange. Furthermore, collapse of the lung areas due to pneumothorax can lead to an abrupt decrease in EtC02 values on capnography, which is a warning sign found in diaphragmatic endometriotic resections. In the second reported case, no significant increase in airway pressure was detected, but the reduction in EtC02 values served as a parameter for diagnostic suspicion. In a case report of pneumothorax during anesthesia for puncture of an ultrasound-guided breast tumor, reduction of EtCO2 was also one of the first indicative signs of pneumothorax (Oliveira RF, et al. 2004). Such conditions should be considered, since prompt diagnosis and treatment are necessary to avoid serious repercussions and even death. In both cases, thoracic drainage was chosen, which caused immediate normalization of respiratory parameters and hemodynamic stabilization, allowing surgery to continue. Intraoperative pneumothorax is a complication that can also occur in patients with pelvic endometriosis to be treated with conventional laparoscopy and who may have diaphragmatic endometriosis not previously diagnosed by imaging tests. The anesthesiologist and the surgeon should be aware that such a complication is a possibility for these patients and should be prepared to diagnose and treat this complication immediately. During robotic assisted videolaparoscopy procedure for the treatment of diaphragmatic endometriosis, the visualization of the endometriosis lesions (behaves as communication holes) in the tendon portion of the diaphragmatic surface and the changes in ventilatory patterns should alert the medical team to the development of incidental tension pneumothorax. The early identification of this complication in both cases allowed rapid intervention for chest drainage and allowed the surgical procedure to continue. - Bulun SE, et al. (2019). Endometriosis. Endocr Rev, 1:40(4):1048-1079. View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Andres MP, et al. (2020). Extra pelvic Endometriosis: A Systematic Review. J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 27(2):373-389. View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Gil Y, et al. (2020). Yaron Gil. Diagnosis and Treatment of Catamenial Pneumothorax: A Systematic Review. J Minim Invasive Gynecology, 27(1):48-53. View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Narula N, et al. (2018). Cureus. Left-sided Catamenial Pneumothorax: A Rare Clinical Entity, 2:10(5):2567. View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Wolthuis AM, et al. (2003). Diaphragmatic endometriosis: diagnosis and surgical management--a case report. Acta Chir Belg, 103(5):519-520. View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Visouli AN, et al. (2012). Catamenial pneumothorax: a rare entity? Report of 5 cases and review of the literature. J Thorac Dis, 4(1):17-31. View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Segawa M, et al. (2011). Catamenial pneumothorax due to diaphragmatic endometriosis confirmed by histological examination; report of a caseKyobu Geka, 64(5):430-433. View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Ceccaroni M, et al. (2012). Pericardial, pleural and diaphragmatic endometriosis in association with pelvic peritoneal and bowel endometriosis: a case report and review of the literature. Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne, 7(2):122-131. View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Oliveira RF, et al. (2004). Pneumotórax hipertensivo intraoperatório após agulhamento guiado por ultrassom: relato de caso. Rev Bras Anestesiol, 54:33. View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Zugliani AH, et al. (2008). Intraoperative pulmonary barotrauma during ophthalmologic surgery. Case report. Rev Bras Anestesiol, 58(1):63-68. View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Frost A, Bach P. (2012). Endometriosis as a cause of pneumothorax. Ugeskr Laeger, 27:174(35):1999-2000. View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Thank you for the speedy and efficient peer review process. I appreciate the fact that your peer reviewers do not take months to respond like with some other journals. I would also like to thank the editorial office for responding quickly to my questions. It is an excellent journal. I plan to submit more manuscripts in the future. Best wishes from, Robert W. McGee Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Working with you and your team on our recent publication in JCRR has been a truly wonderful and enjoyable experience. The responses were prompt, and the reviewers were patient, constructive, and highly professional. One reviewer in particular gave me the feeling that a professor was carefully reading and commenting on my coursework, which was deeply touching. The entire process was straightforward and hassle‑free, with no tedious online forms to complete. I highly recommend this journal. Best wishes from, DR Aibing Rao, Head of R&D I Appreciate the Opportunity to Share my Experience with the Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. The peer review process was timely and constructive, and the feedback provided helped improve the quality of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout the process, ensuring smooth communication and efficient handling of the submission. Overall, it was a positive experience collaborating with your team. Dear Mercy Grace, Editorial Coordinator of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, We would like to express our gratitude for your help at all stages of publishing and editing the article. The editors of the magazine answer all the necessary questions and help at every stage. We will definitely continue to cooperate and publish other works in the Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences! Best wishes from, Alla Konstantinovna Politova, Dear Maria Emerson, Editorial Coordinator of International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews, What distinguishes International Journal of Clinical Case Report and Review is not only the scientific rigor of its publications, but the intellectual climate in which research is evaluated. The submission process is refreshingly free of unnecessary formal barriers and bureaucratic rituals that often complicate academic publishing without adding real value. The peer-review system is demanding yet constructive, guided by genuine scientific dialogue rather than hierarchical or authoritarian attitudes. Reviewers act as collaborators in improving the manuscript, not as gatekeepers imposing arbitrary standards. This journal offers a rare balance: high methodological standards combined with a respectful, transparent, and supportive editorial approach. In an era where publishing can feel more burdensome than research itself, this platform restores the original purpose of peer review — to refine ideas, not to obstruct them Prof. Perlat Kapisyzi, FCCP PULMONOLOGIST AND THORACIC IMAGING. Dear Reader: We have published several articles in the Auctores Publishing, LLC, journal, Clinical Medical Reviews and Reports in recent years (CMRR). This is an ‘open access’ journal and the following are our observations. From the initial invitation to submit an article, to the final edits of galley proofs, we have found CMRR personnel to be professional, responsive, rapid and thorough. This entire process begins with Catherine Mitchell, Editorial Coordinator. She is simply outstanding, and, I believe, unparalleled in her capacity. I cannot imagine a more responsive and dedicated Editorial Coordinator. As I read the dates and timing of her correspondence with us, it seems that she never sleeps. I hope Auctores Publishing, LLC, appreciates her efforts as much as these authors do. Thank you to Auctores Publishing, LLC, to the Editorial Staff/Board, and to Catherine Mitchell from a grateful author(s).