Pelvic MRI in the diagnosis and staging of pelvic endometriosis: added value of structured reporting and expertise

Purpose To compare the diagnostic characteristics of routine-read (RR), structured-reported read (SR), and structured expert-read pelvic (SER) MRI for staging of pelvic endometriosis in a tertiary care academic center.

Of 530 patients with endometriosis (2013–2018), 59/530 (11.1%) were staged surgically and underwent pelvic MRI. Radiology reports were considered RR; MRI studies were independently reassessed by SR and SER. Involvement was recorded by compartment [anterior (AC), middle (MC), posterior (PC), adnexal (AX), and other (OC)]. Diagnostic discrepancy between review methods was assessed with McNemar’s test. Interobserver agreement was assessed using Cohen’s unweighted kappa.

Of 295 compartments in 59 women (mean age = 38.8 years; range 20–69), 147/295 (49.8%) had confirmed endometriosis. Overall sensitivity: RR = 42.9%; SR = 86.4%; SER = 74.2%. SR’s increased sensitivity was significant for PC (p < 0.001), MC (p < 0.001), AC (p = 0.001), AX (p = 0.038). Higher sensitivity by SER was significant for PC (p < 0.001), MC (p = 0.004) and AC (p 0.05). Overall specificity: RR = 95.3%; SR = 45.9%; SER = 81.8%. SER specificity was no different than RR for PC or AX (p > 0.5). RR sensitivity relied heavily on detection of AX involvement, whereas SR and SER showed additional sites of disease while maintaining comparable specificity for SER. Overall agreement between SR and SER was fair [k = 0.342 (95% CI 0.25, 0.44)].

Even at a tertiary care academic center, SER outperforms both SR and RR in the assessment of pelvic endometriosis. Although lack of expertise may negatively impact specificity, use of structured reporting is significantly more sensitive than RR. Therefore, its use can be of assistance in surgical planning and patient counseling. Similar content being viewed by others

Parasar P, Ozcan P, Terry KL (2018) Endometriosis: Epidemiology, Diagnosis and Clinical Management. Curr Obs Gynecol Rep 6(1):34–41 Chamié LP, Blasbalg R, Pereira, RMA, Warmbrand G, & Serafini P (2011) Findings of Pelvic Endometriosis at Transvaginal US , MR Imaging, and. Radiographics 31(4):77–101 Giudice LC, Kao LC (2004) Endometriosis. Lancet 364(9447):1789–99 Chapron C, Chopin N, Borghese B, et al (2006) Deeply infiltrating endometriosis: Pathogenetic implications of the anatomical distribution. Hum Reprod 21(7):1839–45 Takeuchi M, Matsuzaki K, Harada M (2015) Susceptibility-weighted MRI of extra-ovarian endometriosis: preliminary results. Abdom Imaging 40(7):2512–6 Foti PV, Farina R, Palmucci S, et al (2018) Endometriosis: clinical features, MR imaging findings and pathologic correlation. Insights Imaging 9(2)149-172 Ferrero S, Arena E, Morando A, Remorgida (2010) Prevalence of newly diagnosed endometriosis in women attending the general practitioner. Int J Gynecol Obstet 110(3):203–7 Hadfield R, Mardon H, Barlow D, Kennedy S (1996) Delay in the diagnosis of endometriosis: a survey of women from the USA and the UK. Hum Reprod 11(4):878–80 Arruda MS, Petta CA, Abrão MS, Benetti-Pinto CL (2003) Time elapsed from onset of symptoms to diagnosis of endometriosis in a cohort study of Brazilian women. Hum Reprod 18(4):756–9 Hudelist G, Fritzer N, Thomas A, et al (2012) Diagnostic delay for endometriosis in Austria and Germany: Causes and possible consequences. Hum Reprod 27(12):3412–6 Nnoaham KE, Hummelshoj L, Webster P, et al (2011) Impact of endometriosis on quality of life and work productivity: A multicenter study across ten countries. Fertil Steril 96(2):366–373.e8 The Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine (2012) Endometriosis and infertility: A committee opinion. Fertil Steril 98(3):591–8 Dunselman GAJ, Vermeulen N, Becker C, et al (2014) ESHRE guideline: Management of women with endometriosis. Hum Reprod 29(3):400–12 Fernando S, Soh PQ, Cooper M, et al (2013) Reliability of visual diagnosis of endometriosis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 20(6):783–9 Vercellini P, Viganò P, Somigliana E and Fedele L (2014). Endometriosis: Pathogenesis and treatment. Endometr Pathog Treat 10(5):1–477 Hoyos LR, Johnson S, Puscheck E (2017). Endometriosis and Imaging Clin Obstet Gynecol 60(3):503–16 The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (2010) Practice Bulletin: Management of Endometriosis. Obstet Gynec 116(1):223–36 Hsu AL, Khachikyan I, Stratton P (2010) Invasive and noninvasive methods for the diagnosis of endometriosis. Clin Obstet Gynecol 53(2):413–9 Gui B, Valentini AL, Ninivaggi V, et al (2017) Shining light in a dark landscape: MRI evaluation of unusual localization of endometriosis. Diagnostic Interv Radiol 23(4):272–81 Bazot M, Daraï E (2017) Diagnosis of deep endometriosis: clinical examination, ultrasonography, magnetic resonance imaging, and other techniques. Fertil Steril 108(6):886–94 Tammaa A, Fritzer N, Strunk G, et al (2014) Learning curve for the detection of pouch of Douglas obliteration and deep infiltrating endometriosis of the rectum. Hum Reprod 29(6):1199–204 Fraser MA, Agarwal S, Chen I, Singh SS (2014) Routine vs. expert-guided transvaginal ultrasound in the diagnosis of endometriosis: A retrospective review. Abdom Imaging 40(3):587–94 Franconeri A, Fang J, Carney B, et al (2018) Structured vs narrative reporting of pelvic MRI for fibroids: clarity and impact on treatment planning. Eur Radiol 28(7):3009–17 Morassutto C, Monasta L, Ricci G, Barbone F, Ronfani L (2016) Incidence and estimated prevalence of endometriosis and adenomyosis in Northeast Italy: A data linkage study. PLoS One 11(4):1–11 Dallaudière B, Salut C, Hummel V, et al (2013) MRI atlas of ectopic endometriosis. Diagn Interv Imaging 94(3):263–80 Jaramillo-Cardoso A, Balcacer P, Garces-Descovich A, et al (2018) Multimodality imaging and clinicopathologic assessment of abdominal wall endometriosis: knocking down the enigma. Abdom Radiol 1–13 Ganeshan D, Duong PAT, Probyn L, et al. (2018) Structured Reporting in Radiology. Acad Radiol 25(1):66–73 Brook OR, Brook A, Vollmer CM, Kent TS, Sanchez N, Pedrosa I (2015) Structured Reporting of Multiphasic CT for Pancreatic Cancer: Potential Effect on Staging and Surgical Planning. Radiology 274(2):464–72 Tuncyurek O, Garces-Descovich A, Jaramillo-Cardoso A, et al (2018) Structured versus narrative reporting of pelvic MRI in perianal fistulizing disease: impact on clarity, completeness, and surgical planning. Abdom Radiol 8:811–20 European Society of Radiology (2018) ESR paper on structured reporting in radiology. Insights Imaging 1–7 Ito TE, Abi Khalil ED, Taffel M, Moawad GN (2017) Magnetic resonance imaging correlation to intraoperative findings of deeply infiltrative endometriosis. Fertil Steril 107(2):e11–2 Gizzo S, Conte L, Di Gangi S, et al (2015) Could surgeon’s expertise resolve the debate about surgery effectiveness in treatment of endometriosis-related infertility? Arch Gynecol Obstet 292(1):217–23 Reisenauer C (2015) Vesicovaginal fistulas: a gynecological experience in 41 cases at a German pelvic floor center. Arch Gynecol Obstet 292(2):245–53 Muzii L, Marana R, Angioli R, et al (2011) Histologic analysis of specimens from laparoscopic endometrioma excision performed by different surgeons: Does the surgeon matter? Fertil Steril 95(6):2116–9 Busard MPH, Mijatovic V, Van Kuijk C, Hompes PGA, Van Waesberghe J (2011) Appearance of abdominal wall endometriosis on MR imaging. Eur Radiol 20(5):1267–76 Nisenblat V, Prentice L, Pmm B, Farquhar C, M H, Johnson N (2016) Combination of the non-invasive tests for the diagnosis of endometriosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (7)CD012281. Vu K-N, Fast AM, Shaffer RK, et al (2019) Evaluation of the routine use of pelvic MRI in women presenting with symptomatic uterine fibroids: When is pelvic MRI useful? J Magn Reson Imaging 1–11 Glover M, Daye D, Khalilzadeh O, et al (2017) Socioeconomic and Demographic Predictors of Missed Opportunities to Provide Advanced Imaging Services. J Am Coll Radiol 14(11):1403–11 Agarwal SK, Chapron C, Giudice LC, et al (2019) Clinical diagnosis of endometriosis: a call to action. Am J Obstet Gynecol 220(4):354.e1-354.e12 Siegelman ES, Oliver ER (2012) MR Imaging of Endometriosis: Ten Imaging Pearls. RadioGraphics 32(6):1675–91 National Institue for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) (2017) Endometriosis: diagnosis and management. NICE guideline NG73 As-Sanie S (2013) Is a picture worth a thousand biopsies? Challenges in the diagnosis of endometriosis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 20(6):733–4 Author information Authors and Affiliations Corresponding author Ethics declarations Conflict of interest The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. Additional information Publisher's Note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. Rights and permissions About this article Cite this article Jaramillo-Cardoso, A., Shenoy-Bhangle, A., Garces-Descovich, A. et al. Pelvic MRI in the diagnosis and staging of pelvic endometriosis: added value of structured reporting and expertise. Abdom Radiol 45, 1623–1636 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-019-02199-6 Published: Version of record: Issue date: DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-019-02199-6