AI-Assisted Endometriosis Diagnosis: A Multi-CNN Laparoscopic Image Analysis
Three CNN models (ResNet121, InceptionV3, and Xception) were evaluated for diagnosing endometriosis using laparoscopic images, with Xception achieving the highest accuracy of 97%.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
This study evaluated and compared three deep convolutional neural network models (ResNet121, InceptionV3, and Xception) for identifying endometriotic tissue from laparoscopic images, using a custom dataset created by merging images from the ENDI and GLENDA databases. After normalization and data augmentation, the models were trained and validated with stratified splits and assessed with accuracy, precision, recall, AUC, and confusion matrices. The reported accuracies were 89%, 91%, and 97% for ResNet121, InceptionV3, and Xception, respectively, with Xception showing the highest performance. The paper’s main limitation is that it provides performance metrics within its constructed dataset/splits without additional detail on external validation. This paper is centrally about endometriosis — it develops multi-CNN analysis of laparoscopic images to detect endometriotic tissue.
Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works
Full text
5,619 characters
· extracted from
oa-doi-fallback
· 2 sections
· click to expand
Abstract
References
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works
Condition tags
Citation neighborhood
Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.
References (16)
- A Convolutional Neural Network Tool for Early Diagnosis and Precision Surgery in Endometriosis-Associated Ovarian Cancer via openalex
- Artificial intelligence (AI) in the detection of rectosigmoid deep endometriosis via openalex
- Deep endometriosis: definition, diagnosis, and treatment via openalex
- Diagnosis and management of endometriosis via openalex
- Diagnosis of Endometriosis at Laparoscopy: A Validation Study Comparing Surgeon Visualization with Histologic Findings via openalex
- Endometriosis and the risk of cancer with special emphasis on ovarian cancer via openalex
- Endometriosis detection and localization in laparoscopic gynecology via openalex
- ESHRE guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of endometriosis via openalex
- GLENDA: Gynecologic Laparoscopy Endometriosis Dataset via openalex
- New Understanding of Diagnosis, Treatment and Prevention of Endometriosis via openalex
- Strengths and limitations of diagnostic tools for endometriosis and relevance in diagnostic test accuracy research via openalex
- W3202177173 via openalex
- W4289839807 via openalex
- W4295067559 via openalex
- W3142533421 via openalex
- W3120280107 via openalex
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-06-04T00:00:01.174412+00:00