A randomized trial of day-case vs inpatient laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy
RCT
OA: closed
CC0
AI-generated summary
Day-case laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy patients were similarly satisfied with hospitalization length as overnight patients, but experienced lower quality of life.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether women having day-case laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy are more or less satisfied with the length of hospital stay compared with women who stayed overnight after the procedure.
STUDY DESIGN: An randomized control trial of 49 women randomized to day-case or overnight hospital stay after laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy. Satisfaction with length of hospitalization and quality of life were compared using the Mann-Whitney U test.
RESULTS: No group differences were found in satisfaction with length of hospital stay (P = .13). There was a nonsignificant trend toward greater anxiety in the day-case group (P = .06 on day 1 postoperative). Quality of life was lower in the day-case group on days 2 (P = .02) and 4 (P = .03), postoperatively.
CONCLUSION: Women having a day-case hysterectomy were discharged after median of 5 hours postoperative and were similarly satisfied as women hospitalized overnight. Quality of life, however, does appear to be compromised by day-case surgery.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
MeSH descriptors
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
References (18)
- doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2004.09.014 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.jmig.2006.01.010 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2005.01.009 via openalex
- doi:10.3109/9780203490983 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s1074-3804(05)60149-1 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.jmig.2005.06.015 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s1074-3804(05)80983-1 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s1701-2163(16)32258-7 via openalex
- W2407290273 via openalex
- W6654770560 via openalex
- W6713883126 via openalex
- doi:10.1080/01443619866813 via openalex
- doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2007.01269.x via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.jmig.2004.12.022 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s1089-9472(03)00181-3 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s1074-3804(05)60051-5 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.jmig.2005.03.013 via openalex
- doi:10.1007/s00464-007-9255-3 via openalex
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-05-11T05:56:47.744056+00:00
- pubmed
- last seen: 2026-10-08T21:08:28.697392+00:00
License: CC0
· commercial use OK