Proximal Epithelioid Sarcoma Mimicking Inguinal Inflammation

Case report OA: gold CC-BY-4.0
⚙ AI-generated summary by qwen3.7-flash, 2026-10-04 ⓘ

This case report describes a small proximal epithelioid sarcoma in the inguinal region mimicking inflammation, highlighting that atypical presentation and non-specific imaging necessitate pathological evaluation to avoid diagnostic pitfalls.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

⚙ AI-generated deep summary by qwen3.7-flash, 2026-09-30 · read from full text ⓘ

This case report describes a rare instance of proximal epithelioid sarcoma presenting with symptoms that closely mimicked inguinal inflammation. The authors utilized clinical evaluation and histopathological analysis to distinguish the malignant tumor from benign inflammatory conditions, highlighting the diagnostic challenge posed by its atypical presentation. The study emphasizes the importance of considering malignancy in cases of persistent or unusual inguinal swelling despite initial signs suggesting inflammation. The paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Epithelioid sarcoma (ES) is an extremely rare sarcoma categorized into classic and proximal types. Proximal ES is characterized by its occurrence in older individuals, proximal locations, deep tissue involvement, and a tendency to be larger in size. We present a case of an extremely small proximal ES occurring in the inguinal region, which posed significant diagnostic challenges. Clinically, the lesion presented as a painful mass, and magnetic resonance imaging findings suggested lymphadenitis or other inflammatory lesions due to its small size and internal signal patterns. Despite being monitored, the mass showed progression, prompting an incisional biopsy that raised suspicion for ES. Positron emission tomography-computed tomography confirmed the absence of metastases, leading to wide excision. Pathological examination of the excised specimen confirmed proximal ES with negative margins. In this case, characteristic features of proximal ES were scarcely observed, and imaging findings were not distinctive, likely due to the small size of the lesion. Furthermore, the broad differential diagnoses for inguinal masses necessitate careful attention during diagnosis. For sarcomas and tumors in general, reliance solely on clinical and imaging findings can lead to diagnostic pitfalls, emphasizing the importance of active pathological evaluation through biopsy.
Full text 1,238 characters · extracted from epmc-fulltextxml · 7 sections · click to expand

Data

The data presented in this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Author

Conception and design, T.K., T.W., T.T., K.O., M.W., T.H. and J.I.; provision of study materials and patient data, T.K., T.W., S.K. and T.T.; data collection and analysis, T.K., T.W., S.K., T.T., K.O. and J.I.; manuscript writing, T.K., T.W., S.K., T.T., K.O., M.W. and J.I. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by Joint Research Support Grants under the Comprehensive Agreement between Saitama University and Saitama Medical University (22-J-01, 23-J-08, and 24-J-02).

Fn Group

Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Informed

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient to publish this paper.

Conflicts

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Associated Data

The data presented in this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

⚙ Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: epmc-fulltextxml ⓘ

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-10-18T09:30:06.152893+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-10-08T21:51:28.594230+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0 · commercial use OK · attribution required
Per Europe PMC