Ovarian endometrioma – a possible finding in adolescent girls and young women: a mini-review

Young girls before menarche or menstruating adolescent women may experience long-term drug-resistant chronic pelvic pain, as well as other symptoms associated with pelvic mass. In such cases, it is of great importance to consider ovarian endometrioma in the differential diagnosis. In general, endometrioma is re cognized as an ovarian cyst. However, in most cases, the pathology represents pseudocyst with a partial or complete endometrial-like lining with extraovarian adhesions and endometriotic implants which are likely to occur at the sites of ovarian adhesions and at the ceiling of the ovarian fossa. Ovarian endometriomas occur in 17 –44% patients with endometriosis and account for 35% of all benign ovarian cysts. The time span from the onset of menarche to the time of endometrioma formation, which requires surgical intervention, has been evaluated to be a minimum of 4 years. The pathogenesis of early-life endometrioma may be different from other types of endometriosis. Diagnosis is often delayed, especially in adolescents, who tend to wait too long before seeking professional help. The three specific aims of treatment in adolescents with endometriosis and endometriomas are control of symptoms, prevention of further progression of the disease as well as preservation of fertility. Increasing evidence demonstrates association between ovarian endometriosis and ovarian cancer. In the present mini-review, we draw the particular attention of clinicians to such a possibility, even if relatively infrequently reported.

Endometrioma, Endometriosis, Ovarian cyst, Adolescence, Adolescen

Menstruating adolescent women or even young girls before menarche may experience long-term drug-resistant chronic pelvic pain, as well as other symptoms associated with pelvic mass found on ultrasound (US), computed tomography (CT), or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) [1]. In such cases, it is of great importance to consider endometriosis and its local manifestation, ovarian endo- metrioma, in the differential diagnosis. In the present mini-review, we draw attention of clinicians to such a possibility, even if relatively infrequent. Endometriosis Endometriosis is defined as the presence of endometrial glands and stroma outside the uterine cavity [ 2]. The implantation of endometrial tissue in the peritoneal cavity through retrograde menstruation is the most ac- cepted theory of endometriosis but its etiology is still poorly understood [ 3]. A reflux of endometrial cells into the abdominal cavity during menstrual bleedings is a normal condition which occurs in 90% of menstruating women with patent fallopian tubes, although the disease develops only in subjects with hormonal or immune dis- orders [ 4, 5]. In women affected by endometriosis, the peritoneal fluid contains: elevated levels of immune cells which demonstrate increased susceptibility to apoptosis, elevated concentrations of pro-inflammatory mediators/ cytokines such as tumor necrosis factor- α, interleukin- 1β, and interleukin-6, dysfunctional macrophages and NK cells, and highly accumulated regulatory T suppres- sor cells which promote inflammation as well as stand behind the initiation and progression of endometriosis- associated ovarian cancer [ 6–8]. Endometriosis is associ- ated with alteration in hypothalamus-hypophysis-ovary © The Author(s). 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. * Correspondence: [email protected] 6IIND Department of Gynecology, Lublin Medical University, Jaczewskiego str. 8, 20-954 Lublin, Poland Full list of author information is available at the end of the article Gałczyń ski et al. Journal of Ovarian Research (2019) 12:104 https://doi.org/10.1186/s13048-019-0582-5 axis leading to changes in the concentration of estradiol, progesterone, luteinizing hormone (LH), and follicle- stimulating hormone (FSH) in the serum, peritoneal fluid and follicular fluid of women with endometriosis. The ectopic endometrium presents persistent estrogen receptors (ER) hormonally independent during the luteal phase. In addition, endometriotic implants express aromatase which catalyzes conversion of androgens to estrogens suggesting that local estrogens production can increase estrogen concentration and together with circu- lating estrogen can stimulate the growth of endometrio- tic lesions. The action of progesterone mediated via progesteron receptor (PR) is also altered in endometrio- tic patients. The PROGINS polymorphism of PR de- creases the stability of receptor which loses its capacity to inhibit the activation of the ER and thus exposing endometrium to greater action of estrogens. Increased level of LH was observed in the peritoneal fluid of infertile women with endometriosis. Additionally, endometriotic patients have a lower concentration of LH receptor (LHR) in corpus luteum and follicles during the early and late follicular and late luteal phase compared to healthy controls. In severe endometriosis LHR concentration is extremely low [ 9]. Current data suggest that also FSH action mediated by FSH receptor (FSHR) is disrupted in endometriotic patients due to changes in signaling path- ways [ 10]. Usually, peritoneal, ovarian and rectovaginal endometriosis are distinguished based on the most frequent localization [ 11]. In the general population of women of reproductive age, the incidence of endo- metriosis is estimated to be approximately 15%, how- ever, in groups of patients with chronic pelvic pain and infertility, up to 60 and 50% of them may suffer from it, respectively [ 12–14]. Endometriosis is described as premenarcheal and dis- tinguished from adolescent when lesions and associated symptoms occur before menarche, mainly during the- larche [ 4]. It is rather difficult to establish the prevalence rate of endometriosis among adolescents [ 15]. The symptoms often start at young age. Interestingly, the mean duration between their onset and final diagnosis is 22.8 months and the mean number of physicians who have seen the patient before the diagnosis is reached is 3 [14, 16]. Some studies report that due to misinterpret- ation of clinical symptoms the diagnosis may be delayed even by 8 –10 years [ 17]. Girls and women who see a gynecologist first for symptoms related to endometriosis are more likely to report a shorter time to diagnosis, see fewer physicians, and report a better experience overall with their physicians during their diagnostic experience, probably because gynecologists are more familiar with symptoms of endometriosis than other physicians [ 12]. About two thirds of adult women with endometriosis report symptoms arising before 20 years of age [ 18]. Patients with endometriosis mainly report symptoms of pain (including chronic pelvic pain), dysmenorrhea and, if sexually active, dyspareunia [ 19–21]. About two-thirds of adolescent girls with chronic pelvic pain or dysmenor- rhea have laparoscopic evidence of endometriosis. About one-third of these adolescents with endometriosis have moderate-severe disease [ 22]. Data from a retrospective analysis of adolescents with histologically confirmed endometriosis showed that the most common com- plaints were dysmenorrhea (64%), menorrhagia (44%), irregular, abnormal uterine bleeding (60%) and at least one genito-urinary symptom (52%) [ 23]. Dysmenorrhea is likely to be a precursor in the disease development and shorter/shortened cycles may possibly suggest the increased risk [ 24]. Adolescents with endometriosis are more likely to experience migraines than those without endometriosis [ 25]. In epidemiologic studies, several early-life factors were identified which include prenatal exposure to diethylstilbestrol and cigarette smoking, and altered hormonal milieu and exposure to regular soy formula feeding during infancy [ 20]. Some other data indicate that decreased abilities of women to contribute to the society because of the disease amount to the eco- nomic burden of 22 billion in the United States. A delay in the diagnosis escalates the economic impact of endo- metriosis, especially in adolescents who tend to wait too long before seeking professional help [ 17]. Early diagno- sis and treatment of endometriosis seem to be crucial for young patients, increases their quality of life, brings relief of symptoms and decreases morbidity and negative impact of the disease on future fertility. Studies show that the longer the diagnosis is delayed, the more the endometriosis is in an advanced stage at the time of laparoscopy. Treatment in early-stage endometrioma provides less damage to the ovary by a less invasive surgical procedure which decreases the risk of iatrogenic premature ovarian failure. Long-term ovarian endomet- riosis leads to persistent inflammation resulting in fibro- sis of the ovarian cortex and loss of follicles and smooth muscle cell metaplasia [ 4]. Girls before menarche may experience drug-resistant chronic pelvic pain, therefore it is of great importance to include endometriosis in the protocols of differential diagnosis. Pain may remain untreated for a long time, even above 6 months, and may interfere with the patient ’s daily activities [1]. A possible origin of symptoms from the gastrointestinal, genitourinary and musculoskeletal sys- tems and psychosocial aspects should also be taken into consideration [26]. Another problem may arise from the presence of Müllerian duct anomalies (such as unicornu- ate uterus with a non-communicating rudimentary horn or uterus didelphys with a vaginal septum) when, due to secondary obstruction in vaginal menstruation, retrograde tubal menstruation and transportation of endometriotic Gałczyń ski et al. Journal of Ovarian Research (2019) 12:104 Page 2 of 8 implants into the abdominal cavity are enhanced [ 27, 28]. A very early presentation of endometriosis should prompt consideration of Müllerian anomaly with outflow obstruc- tion [29]. Endometriosis is staged according to the revised classi- fication of the American Society for Reproductive Medi- cine and determined on the basis of size, location, and type of lesion(s) and the extent of adhesions [ 23, 30]. The clinical manifestation of endometriosis varies be- tween adolescents and adults. Young patients report severe primary dysmenorrhea which is often resistant to non-steroidal antiinflammatory drugs and oral contra- ceptives. The appearance of peritoneal lesions is also dif- ferent. In adolescents, endometriotic implants are florid (clear or red papules, vesicular implants) with minimal fibrosis. In contrast, in adult patients, black implants with dense fibrotic tissue are common findings [ 5, 23]. Obstructive genital tract anomalies often accompany adolescent endometriosis whereas in adults rectal and bladder endometriosis and uterine adenomyosis are con- comitant pathologies [ 16]. In a recent study, Harris and co-workers reported an increased risk for endometriosis in patients who experienced early-life sexual or physical abuse [ 31]. Early onset endometriosis (EOE) Endometriosis in adolescent patients may have a differ- ent origin from that seen in adult women. A potential cause involved in the development of EOE is neonatal uterine bleeding (NUB) which leads to the seeding of endometrial progenitor cells into the pelvic cavity which become activated around thelarche. These dislocated cells implanted on the pelvic organs remain dormant for years and are activated in the presence of factors leading to the development of highly angiogenic implants, recur- rent ectopic bleeding, and the formation of endometriomas which seems to be a characteristic feature of this type of endometriosis [16]. NUB occurs in approximately 5% of female neonates as an endometrial response to progester- one. The bleeding itself is an effect of progesterone with- drawal. In two-thirds of neonates, the endometrium is proliferative and resistant to progesterone. This resistance persists till menarche, and during first years of adolescence. Occurrence of fetal distress caused by preeclampsia, fetal growth restriction, post-maturity as well as Rhesus isoim- munization is significantly associated with NUB. These feto-maternal factors charact erized by insufficient blood supply of placenta and fetal hypoxia promote decidualiza- tion of fetal endometrium and sensitizes it to progesterone [32]. In the pelvis, endometrial cells and stroma attach quickly to the peritoneum [5, 16]. This theory convincingly explains why endometriosis and endometriomas can occur in girls before their first menstruation and why adolescents can suffer from advanced endometriosis. Benagiano et al. underline that EOE can become hidden, debilitating and progressive disease that impairs the patient ’sf u t u r er e p r o - ductive life [16]. Endometrioma The most common sites of endometriosis are the ovar- ies, followed by the Douglas pouch, the posterior leafs of the broad ligaments, and the sacrouterine ligaments [33]. Ovarian endometriomas occur in 17 –44% patients with endometriosis and account for 35% of all benign ovarian cysts. The time span from the onset of menarche to the time of endometrioma formation which requires surgical intervention has been evaluated to be a mini- mum of 4 years [ 2, 15]. The pathogenesis of early-life endometrioma may be different from other types of endometriosis such as peritoneal implants and rectovagi- nal nodules [ 34]. There are a number of theories explaining the development of endometriotic cysts [ 4]. Endometrioma may be formed due to inversion and subsequent progressive invagination of ovarian cortex with endometriotic implants which fill the cyst with hemolyzed blood. Another explanation is metaplasia of invaginated ovarian celomic epithelium which creates active endometrial tissue. Also, ovarian follicular fluid may potentially induce endometrial cell growth [ 2]. Active endometrial cells implanted on the surface of the ovary secrete matrix metalloproteinases which can lyse the extracellular matrix thus allowing the ectopic cells to infiltrate the ovary and leading to the destruction of the healthy tissue. This up-regulation of matrix metallopro- teinases is mediated by tenascin, which modify cell adhesion. Additionally, follistatin and urocortin are over- expressed in endometriomas, concentrations of which are elevated in the serum. Moreover, high concentra- tions of inhibin A, inhibin B, and activin A in follicular fluid may stimulate growth and differentiation of endo- metriotic cells. Epithelial and stromal endometriotic cells vary from normal endometrium at a molecular level. Different expression of more than 100 genes was found in ectopic endometrium compared to eutopic one. These alterations are associated with cell adhesion, inflamma- tion and remodeling of extracellular matrix. Progester- one resistance, increased estrogen receptor activity, local estrogen production via aromatase activity are caused by genetic and epigenetic changes which are a result of disrupted estrogen –progesterone receptor expression [35]. Interestingly, endometriomas are more common in the left than in the right ovary [ 36, 37]. For example, in the group of 206 patients with endometrial cysts, Matallio- takis and co-workers found endometriomas located twice more frequently in the left ovary (67.4%) than in the right one (32.6%). These authors suggested that the presence and growth of endometriomas are related to anatomic variables, namely anatomic asymmetry (decreased fluid Gałczyń ski et al. Journal of Ovarian Research (2019) 12:104 Page 3 of 8 movement on the left side due to the nearby presence of the sigmoid colon and the left broad ligament). Indeed, the compression syndrome of left renal vein due to the incompetent and dilated left ovarian vein leads to venous congestion and the resultant hypoxia and increased concentrations of sex hormones and cytokines which may explain this phenomenon [37]. Four different types of endometriomas can be distin- guished: cortical invagination cysts, surface inclusion cyst-related endometriotic cysts, physiological cyst-related endometriotic cysts, and unclassified type. The presence of oocytes in the inner wall of the cyst is a proof of an inner cortex inclusion and allows the diagnosis of the cortical invagination type. However, this finding depends on patient age and may be influenced by fibrosis, smooth muscle metaplasia, as well as stretching of the cortex [ 38]. In general, endometrioma is recognized as an ovarian cyst. However, in most cases, the pathology represents pseudo- cyst with a partial or complete endometrial-like lining with extraovarian adhesions and endometriotic implants which are likely to occur at the site(s) of ovarian adhesions and invagination and at the ceiling of the ovarian fossa [39]. Figures 1 A and B represent typical histopathological images of the wall of endometrioma. In some studies, the presence of endometrioma was associated with adhesions to the posterior leaf of the broad ligament in as many as 98% of the cases, and these adhesions were classified more frequently as deep (70.5% of cases) than superficial (29.5%) [38, 40]. Hydroureter and hydronephrosis second- ary to a pelvic mass may be present in patients with large endometrioma [2]. The evaluation of ovarian cortical tissue from women with endometrioma revealed a reduced volume of normal ovarian tissue in the distended ovarian cortex, a finding not observed to this degree in other benign cysts. In com- parison with the healthy organs, ovaries with endometrial cysts have a reduced responsiveness after exogenous go- nadotropin stimulation, lower antral follicles count, lower follicular density in the cortex, increased follicular atresia, and increased activation of early follicular development. Furthermore, the density of primordial follicles is reduced and the general morphology and vasculature network are distorted as well. The follicular loss may occur even at early stages of the cyst development. Fibrosis is frequently evidenced in the ovarian cortex derived from endometrio- mas. The cortex shows increased oxidative stress com- pared to other benign cysts. Along the growth of many benign ovarian tumors, this cortex becomes stretched and thinned, however, in the presence of endometrioma it additionally contains hemosiderin-laden macrophages and fibrotic components [34, 41, 42]. To date, only a few studies evaluating the clinical char- acteristics of endometrioma(s) in adolescents have been published (Tab. 1). Diagnosis The initial imaging technique for the diagnosis of endo- metrioma is US examination, which is nowadays widely available, well-accepted, and allows extensive exploration of the pelvis [ 43]. However, MRI demonstrates an import- ant advantage over other techniques in allowing complete imaging of all pelvic compartments at a time. Also CT can be applied for the diagnosis of endometriosis and revealing various endometriosis-related complications and unusual implantation sites. Laparoscopy remains the “gold standard ” in the final diagnosis of endometriosis and its ovarian manifestation [27, 44]. Almost 50% of adolescents in whom endometri- osis is diagnosed at the time of laparoscopy have a severe disease [ 45]. With enhanced magnification offered by the modern laparoscopic equipment, all endometriotic sites can be identified [ 46]. Principal features of endome- triomas gained from two most popular imaging tech- niques are presented at Table 2. Fig. 1 a, b Typical histopathological images of the wall of endometrioma – sample collected during laparoscopic cyst enucleation at a 20-years-old woman (100x and 200x magnification, respectively) Gałczyń ski et al. Journal of Ovarian Research (2019) 12:104 Page 4 of 8 Although endometriosis is closely related to infertility, some women with endometriomas conceive naturally or with the help of assisted reproductive techniques. There- fore, endometrioma is the most common adnexal mass detected during pregnancy [ 38]. Treatment The three specific aims of treatment in adolescents with endometriosis are: control of symptoms, prevention of further progression of the disease as well as preservation of fertility [ 29, 47]. To minimize pain and disease burden, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, GnRH agonists, progestins and oral contraception pills are mainstream therapeutic options. Endometriomas do not respond to medical therapy alone, thus usually surgical treatment is necessary. A decision to perform surgery in the adolescent patient can be difficult because of the patient ’sf e a ro f surgical intervention and because of potential peri- and post-operative complications [ 17]. Laparoscopic endome- trioma excision is recommended for ovarian cysts larger than 4 cm in diameter [ 34]. The guidelines of the Euro- pean Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology Table 1 Studies on ovarian endometriomas in adolescents published to date Authors Patient age Presentation Symptoms Treatment Wright and Laufer, 2010 [2] 18 On US and CT: huge pelvic mass of 35 cm in diameter, with solid and cystic components, ascites present. On surgery: large right and left ovarian masses with adhesions to the omentum, pelvic sidewalls, fallopian tubes, and uterus, the combined contents were ~ 8 L of chocolate- brown fluid. No symptoms, regular menses, no dysmenorrhea, mild hydroureter and hydronephrosis, CA125 = 379.0 U/mL, LDH = 245.0 IU/L. Laparotomy, enucleation of the cyst in one ovary, drainage of that in the other. Gogacz et al., 2012 [26] 11 On US, a well encapsulated tumor (capsule approximately 3 mm thick) with homogeneous content, located behind the uterus. On surgery, a left ovarian cyst located in the Douglas pouch, containing chocolate-brown fluid, with numerous adhesions to the periton- eum and intestine. Premenarcheal vomiting, severe hypogastric pain. Laparotomy, enucleation of the cyst. Lee et al., 2013 [19] Mean age = 19.2 ± 1 ys (n = 35) Bilateral cysts in 49% of cases, located in the right or left ovary in 20 and 31%, respectively. Cul-de-sac obliteration in 57%. Pain in 77% of cases, incidental in 23% of cases Laparoscopy, enucleation of the cysts. Lee et al., 2017 [15] Mean age = 19.1 ± 1.2 ys (n = 105) Mean cyst size 75 ± 29 mm, bilateral in 21% of cases, located in the right or left ovary in 42.9 and 36.2%, respectively. Complete or partial cul- de-sac obliteration in 14.3 and 32.4%, respectively. Dysmenorrhea in 40.5% of cases, pelvic pain in 18.8%, gastrointestinal symptoms in 6%, mass effect in 18.8%, incidental detection of endometrioma in 9.4%. Laparoscopy, enucleation of the cysts. CA 125 – cancer antigen 125 concentration in serum, LDH – lactate dehydrogenase activity in serum Table 2 Main features of endometrioma images on US and MRI examinations [ 27, 44] Technique Endometrioma Image Suspicion of malignant transformation US Unilocular or multilocular (less than 5 locules) cysts. Homogenous low-level echogenicity (ground glass echogenicity). Poor or no vascularization. Presence of diffuse low-level echoes. Multilocularity of hyperechoic foci in the wall. Blot clots or fibrin adjacent to the cyst wall forming papillations (no vascularisation inside). Thin septa in large endometriomas. Anechoic thin-walled cyst with echogenic vegetation or focal wall nodularity (blood clots or fibrosis due to recurrent hemorrhage can mimick these findings). MRI Specific sign – shading (caused by old blood products containing high levels of iron and protein). Higher T1, lower T2 signal intensities than in hemorrhagic cysts. Shortening of T1 and T2 secondary to high protein concentration and increased viscosity. Bilateral and multifocal lesions. Cystic mass containing mural nodules and hemorrhagic fluid. Enhancing mural nodules within endometrioma on T1 W1 is highly suggestive of malignancy. Absence of characteristic T2-weighted “shading” which disappears in malignant tumor. US Ultrasound, MRI Magnetic Resonance Imaging Gałczyń ski et al. Journal of Ovarian Research (2019) 12:104 Page 5 of 8 recommend that endometriomas above 3 cm should be removed before in vitro fertilization (IVF) procedure. Bro- sens et al. [ 38] noted that as far as the endometrioma size is concerned, no consensus on a cut-off value exists above which surgical treatment should be offered to the patient. One of the most important points is that following ovarian surgery a significant reduction of the ovarian reserve due to the damage to the healthy ovarian tissue may occur. Endometriomas themselves could also be linked to this process. Some authors suggest that surgery, that is, per- formed at early stages of endometrioma development, may alleviate the local inflammatory environment in the diseased ovaries and thus protect them. They emphasize the role of induced by endometrioma local inflammation which causes “burnout” of early follicles in the ovary. This effect was observed at an early stage of endometrioma for- mation (1–4 cm in diameter). Active management of small cysts may potentially prevent follicle loss [ 34, 42]. Endo- metriomas of 6 cm or more in diameter may be associated with increased risks for infection, rupture, and even malig- nancy, and therefore, surgical intervention is considered obligatory. The level of expertise in endometriotic surgery is inversely correlated with inadvertent removal of healthy ovarian tissue along with the endometrioma capsule [ 38]. Due to disruption and disorganization of the cortical wall and loss of identity of the inner cortex, this layer may be difficult to recognize. During cystectomy, identification of cleavage planes becomes difficult leading to unwitting de- struction of healthy ovarian tissue [ 4]. At present, in some centers expectant management is being proposed rather than surgical removal of the cyst. Brosens et al. reported that current management of endometrioma is changing from overtreatment to undertreatment which might be an unfavorable approach because endometrioma is not a sim- ple chocolate cyst which has a tendency to spontaneously disappear, but it is associated with inflammation inde- pendent of the lesion ’s size, leading to fibrosis of the ovar- ian cortex, smooth muscle cells metaplasia, and loss of oocytes. These authors concluded that ectopic endomet- rial tissue should be removed irrespective of the size of the cyst and duration of the disease [ 38]. Laparoscopic treatment of endometriosis and excision of endometrio- mas were also associated with improvements in pain relief [48]. Although laparoscopy is traditionally recommended, transvaginal endoscopy is also safe and it is most effective in the treatment of endometriomas that are not larger than 3 cm in diameter [ 4]. It is worth to mention, taking into consideration future fertility of young women, that surgical treatment of endometrioma undergoing IVF did not alter the outcome of procedure compared to women who did not receive intervention. Women with endome- trioma undergoing IVF had similar reproductive outcomes compared with those without the disease, although their cycle cancellation rate is significantly higher [49]. Recurrence Lee and co-investigators [15] assessed the possibility of recurrence of endometrioma in adolescents after the first-line surgical intervention, where the Kaplan-Meier

was applied. After 24, 36, 60 and 96 months, the cumulative recurrence rates were 6.4, 10, 19.9 and 30.9%, respectively. For adults, the recurrence rate of endometrioma after primary surgery is approximately 12–30% after 2 –4 years of follow-up. In the Lee study, diameter of the tumor, stage of endometriosis, coexistence of deep-infiltrating endometriosis, or uni- or bi-lateral in- volvement of ovaries were all not associated with the risk of recurrence. The median time to recurrence was 53 months. Also, increase in recurrence is associated with age of patients – 4.6% among women aged 20 –30 years and 13.2% among women older than 30 years old [ 15]. Some studies recommend postoperative hormonal sup- pression to reduce risk of recurrence of endometriosis but some authors didn’t support this concept [ 46]. Endometrioma and cancer Increasing evidence demonstrates association between ovarian endometriosis and ovarian cancer [ 50]. The malignant transformation may occur in up to 1% of endometrioma cases, mostly from ovarian lesions [ 6]. The risk increases with advanced age at endometrioma diagnosis as well as the size of the lesion. The diameter above 9 cm and post-menopausal age were independent predictive factors for the development of ovarian cancer. Endometriosis-associated ovarian cancer affects women 10–20 years earlier than those suffering from ovarian cancer without endometriosis [ 27]. In the group of women with endometrioma, 0.72% developed histologically proven ovarian cancer, with clear-cell and endometrioid- type histotypes in 39 and 35% of cases, respectively. Loss of heterozygosity and genomic instability were observed in endometriotic tissue and represented events with highly mutagenic potential. The most common implicated genes are ARID1A, PTEN, K-ras, p53, HNF, and the microRNAs. Inactivation of PTEN occurs at the beginning of malignant transformation of endometriosis and was found in > 75% of endometriosis-associated ovarian tumors and 15% of endometriotic lesions. Mutations of p53 are found in approximately 80% of high-grade serous ovarian cancers and are often present in the region of transition atypical endometriotic lesions to ovarian cancer. Mutations of K-ras were found in 10–20% of cancers associated with endomet- riosis. Clear-cell cancer can be preceded with expression of HNF in endometriotic lesions. I n-activating mutations of chromatin-remodeling ARID1A have been found in 49% clear-cell and 30% endometrioid-type ovarian cancers [51]. Some studies suggest other possible mechanisms through which endometriosis can be associated with development of ovarian cancer, such as persistent inflammatory process Gałczyń ski et al. Journal of Ovarian Research (2019) 12:104 Page 6 of 8 with cytokines and mediators d erived from endometriosis environment, higher levels of estrogens observed in endo- metriosis and oxidative stress [52]. Consequently, at present there is sufficient evidence to conclude that women with histologically proven endometriosis are at increased risk of developing clear-cell and endometrioid-type ovarian malig- nancies [ 53]. Both these histologic types of cancer share similar gene expression pattern, consistent with common origin. Atypical endometriosis, often found in the direct continuity with the tumor, may be a proof of a transition from benign to malignant disease and accompanied 60 – 80% of all endometriosis-associated ovarian cancers. In atypical lesions, large ple omorphic nuclei, increased nuclear-to-cytoplasmic ratio, cellular crowding, and stratifi- cation of tufting were observed [ 6]. A ruptured ovarian endometrioma can mimick ovarian neoplasm and be a diagnostic dilemma due to high concentration of CA 125 in the serum [ 54]. Some data suggest correlation between endometriosis and other cancers, such as non-Hodkin lymphoma, breast cancer (BC), melanoma, kidney and endocrine cancers, but this as sociation has not been clari- fied, yet [ 52]. Possible pathogenet ic pathways that relate endometriosis and breast can cer were assessed in several studies. In a retrospective study, which evaluated the famil- ial risk of BC in women with endometriosis, it was found that 26.7% of women with endometriosis and 5% of women without endometriosis had a positive family history of BC. Reduction in risk of BC in women with bilateral oophorec- tomy with hysterectomy due to endometriosis was observed in one study. Early interruption of inflammatory process which may contribute to BC may be explanation of this result. Additionally, the treatment of endometriosis could also be implicated in breast ca rcinogenesis. The hypotesis that endometriosis and BC could share BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes mutations was not confirmed [52, 55].

Both young and adolescent girls may experience drug- resistant chronic pelvic pain before menarche, therefore, it is of great importance to consider endometriosis in the diagnostic protocol. Endometriosis-like symptoms in girls before the age of 15 years or before menarche indicate the need to screen such girls as early as they develop promin- ent symptoms. Obstetrician-gynecologists are more famil- iar with symptoms of endometriosis than other physicians and may be more likely to pursue endometriosis as a diag- nostic dilemma, especially in girls with dysmenorrhea and chronic pelvic pain resistant to hormonal treatment. Abbreviations BR: Breast Cancer; CA 125: Cancer Antygen 125; CT: Computed Tomography; EOE: Early Onset Endometriosis; ER: Estrogen Receptor; FSH: Follicle-stimulating Hormone; FSHR: Follicle-stimulating Hormone Receptor; LDH: Lactate Dehydrogenase; LH: Luteinizing Hormone; LHR: Luteinizing Hormone Receptor; MRI: Magnetic Resonance Imaging; NK: Natural Killer Cells; NUB: Neonatal Uterine Bleeding; PR: Progesteron Receptor; US: Ultrasound Acknowledgments This study was supported by a grant from Lublin Medical University, Lublin, Poland (Dz. St. 326/19 to A.S.) Authors’ contributions KG and AS conceived the idea for the review and its structure, reviewed literature and drafted the manuscript. MJ participate in the review of the literature and drafting the manuscript. AS-S and DL participated in the draft- ing of the manuscript. DL prepared histopathological figures for publication and draft the manuscript. All authors approved the final version of the manuscript. Funding Not applicable. Availability of data and materials Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study. Ethics approval and consent to participate Not applicable. Consent for publication Not applicable. Competing interests The authors declare that they have no competing interests. Author details 1Siedlce University of Natural Sciences and Humanities, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Konarskiego str. 2, 08-110 Siedlce, Poland. 2Second Department of Gynecological Oncology, St. John ’s of Dukla Cancer Center of Lublin, Jaczewskiego str. 7, 20-090 Lublin, Poland. 3Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Bia łystok Medical University, Kili ń skiego str. 1, 15-089 Białystok, Poland. 4Department of Clinical Pathology, Lublin Medical University, Jaczewskiego str. 8b, 20-090 Lublin, Poland. 5Department of Pathology of Pregnancy, Lublin Medical University, Staszica str. 16, 20-081 Lublin, Poland. 6IIND Department of Gynecology, Lublin Medical University, Jaczewskiego str. 8, 20-954 Lublin, Poland. Received: 24 January 2019 Accepted: 15 October 2019

1. Marsh EE, Laufer MR. Endometriosis in premenarcheal girls who do not have an associated obstructive anomaly. Fertil Steril. 2005;83:758 –60. 2. Wright KN, Laufer MR. Endometriomas in adolescents. Fertil Steril. 2010;94: 1529 e7–8. 3. Brosens I, Gargett CE, Guo S-W, Puttemans P, Gordts S, Brosens JJ, et al. Origins and progression of adolescent endometriosis. Reprod Sci. 2016;23: 1282–8. 4. Gordts S, Puttemans P, Gordts S, Brosens I. Ovarian endometrioma in adolescent: a plea for early-stage diagnosis and full surgical treatment. Gynecol Surg. 2015;12:21 –30. 5. Benagiano G, Bianchi P, Brosens I. Ovarian endometriomas in adolescents often represent active angiogenic disease requiring early diagnosis and careful management. Minerva Ginecol. 2017;69:100 –7. 6. Suryawanshi S, Huang X, Elishaev E, Budiu RA, Hang L, Kim S, et al. Complement pathway is frequently altered in endometriosis and endometriosis-associated ovarian cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2014;20:6163 –74. 7. Gogacz M, Winkler I, Bojarska-Junak A, Tabarkiewicz J, Semczuk A, Rechberger T, Adamiak A. T regulatory lymphocytes in patients with endometriosis. Mol Med Rep. 2014;10:1072 –6. 8. Gogacz M, Ga łczyń ski K, Wojta ś M, Winkler I, Adamiak A, Romanek-Piva K, Rechberger T, Kotarski J. Fas-related apoptosis of peritoneal fluid macrophages in endometriosis patients: understanding the disease. J Immunol Res. 2017;3175394. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/3175394. 9. Parente Barbosa C, Bentes De Souza AM, Bianco B, Christofolini DM. The effect of hormones on endometriosis development. Minerva Ginecol. 2011; 63:375–86. Gałczyń ski et al. Journal of Ovarian Research (2019) 12:104 Page 7 of 8 10. Gonzalez-Fernandez R, Pena O, Hernandez J, Martin-Vassalo P, Palumbo A, Avila J. Patients with endometriosis and patients with poor ovarian reserve have abnormal follicle-stimulating hormone receptor signaling pathways. Fertil Steril. 2011;95:2373 –8. 11. Matalliotakis M, Goulielmos GN, Matalliotaki C, Trivli A, Matalliotakis I, Arici A. Endometriosis in adolescent and young girls: report on a series of 55 cases. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2017;30:568 –70. 12. Greene R, Stratton P, Cleary SD, Ballweg ML, Sinaii N. Diagnostic experience among 4344 women reporting surgically diagnosed endometriosis. Fertil Steril. 2009;91:32–8. 13. Seo JW, Lee DY, Yoon BK, Choi D. The efficacy of postoperative cyclic oral contraceptives after gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist therapy to prevent endometrioma recurrence in adolescents. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2017;30:223 –7. 14. DiVasta AD, Vitonis AF, Laufer MR, Missmer SA. Spectrum of symptoms in women diagnosed with endometriosis during adolescence vs adulthood. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018;218:324 e1 –11. 15. Lee SY, Kim ML, Seong SJ, Bae JW, Cho YJ. Recurrence of ovarian endometrioma in adolescents after conservative, laparoscopic cyst enucleation. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2017;30:228 –33. 16. Benagiano G, Guo S-W, Puttemans P, Gordts S, Brosens I. Progress in the diagnosis and management of adolescent endometriosis: an opinion. Reprod BioMed Online. 2018;36:102 –14. 17. Ahn SH, Singh V, Tayade C. Biomarkers in endometriosis: challenges and opportunities. Fertil Steril. 2017;107:523 –31. 18. Yang Y, Wang Y, Yang J, Wang S, Lang J. Adolescent endometriosis in China: a retrospective analysis of 63 cases. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2012; 25:295–9. 19. Lee DY, Kim HJ, Yoon BK, Choi D. Clinical characteristics of adolescent endometrioma. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2013;26:117 –9. 20. Upson K, Sathyanrayana S, Scholes D, Holt V. Early-life factors and endometriosis risk. Fertil Steril. 2015;104:964 –71. 21. Fong YF, Hon SK, Low LL, Mei L, Xian K. The clinical profile of young and adolescent women with laparoscopically diagnosed endometriosis in a Singapore tertiary hospital. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;56:181 –3. 22. Janssen EB, Rijkers AC, Hoppenbrouwers K, Meuleman C, D ’Hooghe TM. Prevalence of endometriosis diagnosed by laparoscopy in adolescents with dysmenorrhea or chronic pelvic pain: a systematic review. Hum Reprod Update. 2013;19:570 –82. 23. Dowlut-McElroy T, Strickland J. Endometriosis in adolescents. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2017;29:306 –9. 24. Templeman C. Adolescent endometriosis. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2012; 24:288–92. 25. Miller JA, Missmer SA, Vitonis AF, Sarda V, Laufer MR, DiVasta A. Prevalence of migraines in adolescents with endometriosis. Fertil Steril. 2018;109:685 –90. 26. Gogacz M, Sarzy ń ski M, Napiera ła R, Sieroci ń ska-Sawa J, Semczuk A. Ovarian endometrioma in an 11-year-old girl before menarche: a case study with literature review. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2012;25:e5 –7. 27. Tran-Harding K, Nair RT, Dawkins A, Ayoob A, Owen J, Deraney S, et al. Endometriosis revisited: an imaging review of the usual and unusual manifestations with pathological correlation. Clin Imaging. 2018;52:163 –71. 28. Tong J, Zhu L, Chen N, Lang J. Endometriosis in association with Herlyn- Werner-Wunderlich syndrome. Fertil Steril. 2014;102:790 –4. 29. Black AY, Jamieson MA. Adolescent endometriosis. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2002;14:467 –74. 30. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists: ACOG Committee Opinion. Endometriosis in adolescents. Obstet Gynecol. 2005;105:921 –27. 31. Harris HR, Wieser F, Vitonis AF, Rich-Edwards J, Boynton-Jarrett R, Bertone- Johnson ER, Missmer SA. Early life abuse and risk of endometriosis. Hum Reprod. 2018;33:1657 –68. 32. Brosens I, Benagiano G. Clinical significance of neonatal menstruation. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2016;196:57 –9. 33. Gordts S, Koninckx P, Brosens I. Pathogenesis of deep endometriosis. Fertil Steril. 2017;108:872 –86. 34. Kitajima M, Defrere S, Dolmans MM, Colette S, Squifflet J, Van Langendonckt A, et al. Endometriomas as a possible cause of reduced ovarian reserve in women with endometriosis. Fertil Steril. 2011;96:685 –91. 35. Benagiano G, Petraglia F, Gordts S, Brosens I. A new approach to the management of ovarian endometrioma to prevent tissue damage and recurrence. Reprod BioMed Online. 2016;32:556 –62. 36. Sznurkowski JJ, Emerich J. Endometriomas are more frequent on the left side. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2008;87:104 –6. 37. Matalliotakis IM, Cakmak H, Koumantakis EE, Margariti A, Neonaki M, Goumenou A. Arguments for a left lateral predisposition of endometrioma. Fertil Steril. 2009;91:975 –8. 38. Brosens I, Gordts S, Puttemans P, Benagiano G. Pathophysiology proposed as the basis for modern management of the ovarian endometrioma. Reprod BioMed Online. 2014;28:232 –8. 39. Brosens I, Gordts S, Benagiano G. Endometriosis in adolescents is a hidden, progressive and severe disease that deserves attention, not just compassion. Hum Reprod. 2013;28:2026 –31. 40. Mereu L, Florio P, Carri G, Pontis A, Petraglia F, Mencaglia L. Clinical outcomes associated with surgical treatment of endometrioma coupled with resection of the posterior broad ligament. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2012; 116:57–60. 41. Filippi F, Benaglia L, Paffoni A, Restelli L, Vercellini P, Somigliana E, et al. Ovarian endometriomas and oocyte quality: insights from in vitro fertilization cycles. Fertil Steril. 2014;101:988 –93. 42. Kitajima M, Dolmans MM, Donnez O, Masuzaki H, Soarez M, Donnez J. Enhanced follicular recruitment and atresia in cortex derived from ovaries with endometriosis. Fertil Steril. 2014;101:1031 –7. 43. Exacoustos C, Zupi E, Piccione E. Ultrasound imaging for ovarian and deep infiltrating endometriosis. Semin Reprod Med. 2017;35:5 –24. 44. Exacoustos C, Manganaro L, Zupi E. Imaging for the evaluation of endometriosis and adenomyosis. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2014; 28:655–81. 45. Solnik MJ. Chronic pelvic pain and endometriosis in adolescents. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2006;18:511 –8. 46. Yeung P, Sinervo K, Winer W, Albee R. Complete laparoscopic excision of endometriosis in teenagers: is postoperative hormonal suppression necessary? Fertil Steril. 2011;95:1909 –12. 47. Johnson NP. Hummelshoj L, the world endometriosis society Montpellier Consortium. Consensus on current management of endometriosis. Hum Reprod. 2013;28:1552 –68. 48. Brown J, Farquhar C. Endometriosis: an overview of Cochrane reviews. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858. 49. Hamdan M, Dunselman G, Li TC, Cheong Y. The impact of endometrioma on IVF/ICSI outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Updates. 2015;21:809 –25. 50. Aris A. Endometriosis associated ovarian cancer: a ten year cohort study of women living in the Estrie region of Quebec. Canada J Ovarian Res. 2010;3:2. 51. Neto JS, Kho RM, Freitas dos Santos Siufi D, Baracat EC, Anderson KS, Abrao MS. Cellular, histologic, and molecular changes associated with endometriosis and ovarian cancer. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2014;21:55 –63. 52. Anifantaki F, Boutas I, Kalampokas T, Kalampokas E, Sofoudis C, Salakos N. Association of endometriosis and breast cancer: mini review of the literature. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2016;293:5 –10. 53. Heidemann L, Hartwell D, Heidemann C, Jochumsen K. The relation between endometriosis and ovarian cancer – a review. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2014;93:20–31. 54. Göçmen A, Karaca M, Tarakçio ğ lu M. A ruptured ovarian endometrioma mimicking ovarian malignancy: case report. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 2003;24: 445–6. 55. Matalliotakis IM, Cakmak H, Mahutte N, Goumenou AG, Koumantakis G, Arici A. The familial risk of breast cancer in women with endometriosis from Yale series. Surg Oncol. 2008;17:289 –93. Publisher’sN o t e Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. Gałczyń ski et al. Journal of Ovarian Research (2019) 12:104 Page 8 of 8