Abstract
The origin of endometriosis has multiple theories, with controversy over which may demonstrate the
prominent pathophysiology. The most common extra-pelvic organ system affected by endometriosis is the
gastrointestinal tract. Gastrointestinal endometriosis (GE) accounts for 3 to 37% of all endometriosis cases,
and appendiceal endometriosis is present in around 3% of GE cases, therefore constituting less than 1% of
all endometriosis cases.
In this report, we present a 24-year-old female with a past medical history significant for endometriosis
status post two excisional laparoscopies who presented with eight months’ duration of right lower quadrant
pain, constant and stabbing, with rebound tenderness. Appendectomy and histopathology demonstrated
focal endometriosis, diffuse serosal fibrovascular adhesions involving the appendiceal serosa/subserosa, as
well as a dilated lumen filled with hemorrhagic content.
When the appendix is not considered in endometriosis pathology, patients are at increased risk for
unresolved pain and further laparoscopic procedures. Prophylactic appendectomy appears to be a
worthwhile consideration in patients with chronic pelvic pain, given the high frequency of appendiceal
pathology.
Categories:
Family/General Practice, Internal Medicine, Obstetrics/Gynecology
Keywords
endometriosis surgery, dysmenorrhea endometriosis, laparoscopic surgery for endometriosis, chronic
appendicitis, endometriosis and chronic pelvic pain, appendiceal endometriosis
Introduction
Endometriosis occurs when endometrial glands and stroma are found outside the uterine cavity or
musculature
[1]
. The origin of the disease is still undetermined and there is controversy over leading
theories of its origin. These theories include Sampson’s theory, which states that endometrial lesions are
implanted into the pelvic cavity through retrograde menstruation; Bronsen and Benagiano's theory, which
suggests that endometriosis lesions originate from retrograde bleeding that occurs due to neonatal
hormonal deprivation; a theory that suggests that Mullerian duct embryonic cells persist in ectopic
locations; and finally, yet another theory that suggests a genetic risk for endometriosis
[2]
. As described, the
origin of endometriosis has multiple theories, with controversy over which theory may demonstrate the
prominent pathophysiology.
Current options for medical management of endometriosis symptoms include non-steroidal anti-
inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), combined oral contraceptives, progestins, gonadotropin-releasing hormone
agonists, gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonists, and aromatase inhibitors
[3]
. However, these
medical management options only work to suppress ovarian function and are not curative for endometriosis.
Surgical management of endometriosis includes ablation and excision of endometriosis lesions as well as
neural ablation and resection for pain management. Medical versus surgical management of endometriosis
is a broad and multifactorial decision, and currently, neither can be recommended over the other
[4]
.
The most common extra-pelvic organ system affected by endometriosis is the gastrointestinal tract. Of the
gastrointestinal tract, the sigmoid colon is the most commonly involved, followed by the rectum, ileum,
appendix, and cecum
[5]
. Appendiceal endometriosis (AE) was first described in 1860
[6]
. Gastrointestinal
endometriosis (GE) accounts for 3 to 37% of all endometriosis cases, and AE is present in around 3% of GE
cases, therefore constituting less than 1% of all endometriosis cases
[7,8]
. For many women, receiving a
diagnosis of endometriosis is a long process plagued by misdiagnoses, barriers to care, and psychosocial
impacts. Common barriers to proper diagnosis and treatment include the wide variety and severity of
symptoms present in patients with endometriosis, as well as the diagnostic gold standard of an invasive
surgical laparoscopic procedure. These barriers have posed a well-established delay of four to 11 years from
first symptom onset to surgical diagnosis
[9]
. Apart from the controversy in the pathogenesis of
endometriosis, the disease carries multiple other factors that complicate the diagnosis, treatment, and
understanding of this disease as a whole.
1
2
2
Open Access Case
Report
DOI:
10.7759/cureus.37825
How to cite this article
Klein S, Tourangeau-Young R, Biglione A (April 19, 2023) Appendiceal Endometriosis Presenting As Chronic Appendicitis: A Case Report. Cureus
15(4): e37825.
DOI 10.7759/cureus.37825
Case Presentation
We are presenting a 24-year-old nulliparous female with a significant past medical history of endometriosis
who presented to the clinic with right lower quadrant pain of eight-month duration. The pain was not
correlated with the patient’s menstrual cycles and occurred nearly every day. On presentation, symptoms
included bloating, a sense of heaviness in the pelvic region that was worse at the end of each day, and bowel
habit changes, including both diarrhea and constipation. The patient also described a constant, dull, aching
pain that was frequently interrupted by bouts of severe pain that was stabbing in nature and accompanied by
nausea. The patient reported that her pain was not relieved by non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs
(NSAIDs) and that a heating pad and rest were the only treatments that gave her relief. The patient takes
norethindrone 5mg daily for suppression of endometriosis as well as contraception. The patient has a
history of two laparoscopic procedures for diagnosis of endometriosis, excision of endometrioma,
endometriotic lesions, and adhesions in locations including the bilateral ovaries and the bladder wall,
uterine wall, and abdominal wall. On physical examination, the patient has right lower quadrant
hypertonicity, guarding, and rebound tenderness. The pelvic exam was nonsignificant, and laboratory
studies and ultrasound imaging failed to reveal any acute or abnormal pathology.
A conservative treatment consisting of norethindrone 5mg daily failed to improve the patient’s symptoms.
After a discussion of different treatment options and their risks and benefits, the patient decided on
laparoscopic exploration for recurrent endometriotic lesions. During the laparoscopic procedure, no
recurrent endometriotic lesions were found on the bilateral ovaries, uterus, bladder, or abdominal wall. The
appendix was found to be mildly dilated (Figure
1
, blue arrow) with significant scar tissue around the
appendix and the cecum (Figure
1
, black arrow). The appendix was excised, and histopathology
demonstrated focal endometriosis, diffuse serosal fibrovascular adhesions involving the appendiceal serosa
and subserosa, as well as a dilated lumen filled with hemorrhagic content (Figure
2
). Since the procedure, the
patient reports a complete resolution of symptoms. The patient continues on norethindrone 5mg daily for
suppression of endometriosis recurrence and contraception.
FIGURE
1: Laparoscopy imaging showing a mildly dilated appendix
(blue arrow) with significant scar tissue around the appendix and the
cecum (black arrow).
2023 Klein et al. Cureus 15(4): e37825. DOI 10.7759/cureus.37825
2
of
4
FIGURE
2: The appendix post-appendectomy
Discussion
While rare, appendiceal endometriosis should be considered in the differential diagnosis of females with
chronic pelvic pain. Patients are already facing obstacles to diagnosis, including the variety in
symptomatology, controversy in pathogenesis and medical treatment, and the need for a laparoscopic
procedure for a definitive diagnosis. In addition to these obstacles, the great variety in the gross appearance
of endometriotic lesions presents a further challenge for complete surgical excision. While typical
endometriotic lesions have a blue-black pigment, there are non-pigmented lesions that can impede the
gross and conclusive recognition of endometriosis during the laparoscopic procedure. These lesions include
but are not limited to, white opacified peritoneum, red flamelike lesions, glandular lesions, and yellow-
brown peritoneal patches
[10]
. Even when not grossly visualized in the appendix during a laparoscopic
procedure, endometriotic lesions can still be present within the appendiceal tissue. In a study done by
Jocko et al., of 71 appendices that had appeared normal on gross visualization during laparoscopy but were
removed, 44% had positive pathology, regardless of diagnosis
[11]
. In a study performed by Lyons et al., 154
out of 190 females undergoing laparoscopic surgery for pelvic pain had an abnormal pathology of the
appendix. This study endorsed the idea that prophylactic appendectomy appears to be a worthwhile
consideration in patients with chronic pelvic pain, given the high frequency of appendiceal pathology
[12]
.
Conclusions
Endometriosis is a quite complicated and poorly understood disease, and for patients already dealing with
painful symptomatology, psychosocial impacts, and a delay in diagnosis, the variety of pathologic
presentation presents a barrier to patients getting adequate and timely treatment and resolution of
symptoms. When the appendix is not considered in disease pathology, patients are at increased risk of
unresolved pain and, thus, further laparoscopic procedures. Therefore, a prophylactic appendectomy should
be considered in patients with chronic pelvic pain who are already undergoing laparoscopy. More research is
needed to determine the benefits and risks of prophylactic appendectomy in chronic pelvic pain patients.
Additional Information
Disclosures
Human subjects:
Consent was obtained or waived by all participants in this study.
Conflicts of interest:
In
compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following:
Payment/services
info:
All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the
submitted work.
Financial relationships:
All authors have declared that they have no financial
relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an
2023 Klein et al. Cureus 15(4): e37825. DOI 10.7759/cureus.37825
3
of
4
interest in the submitted work.
Other relationships:
All authors have declared that there are no other
relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.
References
1
.
Agarwal SK, Chapron C, Giudice LC, et al.:
Clinical diagnosis of endometriosis: a call to action
. Am J Obstet
Gynecol. 2019, 220:354.e1-354.e12.
10.1016/j.ajog.2018.12.039
2
.
Rolla E:
Endometriosis: advances and controversies in classification, pathogenesis, diagnosis, and
treatment
. F1000Res. 2019, 8:
10.12688/f1000research.14817.1
3
.
Ferrero S, Evangelisti G, Barra F:
Current and emerging treatment options for endometriosis
. Expert Opin
Pharmacother. 2018, 19:1109-25.
10.1080/14656566.2018.1494154
4
.
Carlyle D, Khader T, Lam D, Vadivelu N, Shiwlochan D, Yonghee C:
Endometriosis pain management: a
review
. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2020, 24:49.
10.1007/s11916-020-00884-6
5
.
Charatsi D, Koukoura O, Ntavela IG, et al.:
Gastrointestinal and urinary tract endometriosis: a review on the
commonest locations of extrapelvic endometriosis
. Adv Med. 2018, 2018:3461209.
10.1155/2018/3461209
6
.
Laskou S, Papavramidis TS, Cheva A, Michalopoulos N, Koulouris C, Kesisoglou I, Papavramidis S:
Acute
appendicitis caused by endometriosis: a case report
. J Med Case Rep. 2011, 5:144.
10.1186/1752-1947-5-144
7
.
Gon S, Barui GN, Majumdar B, Baig SJ:
Endometriosis of the appendix: a diagnostic dilemma
. Indian J Surg.
2010, 72:315-7.
10.1007/s12262-010-0087-3
8
.
Gupta R, Singh AK, Farhat W, et al.:
Appendicular endometriosis: a case report and review of literature
. Int J
Surg Case Rep. 2019, 64:94-6.
10.1016/j.ijscr.2019.07.046
9
.
Gustofson RL, Kim N, Liu S, Stratton P:
Endometriosis and the appendix: a case series and comprehensive
review of the literature
. Fertil Steril. 2006, 86:298-303.
10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.12.076
10
.
Jansen RP, Russell P:
Nonpigmented endometriosis: clinical, laparoscopic, and pathologic definition
. Am J
Obstet Gynecol. 1986, 155:1154-9.
10.1016/0002-9378(86)90136-5
11
.
Jocko JA, Shenassa H, Singh SS:
The role of appendectomy in gynaecologic surgery: a Canadian
retrospective case series
. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2013, 35:44-8.
10.1016/s1701-2163(15)31047-1
12
.
Lyons TL, Winer WK, Woo A:
Appendectomy in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery for pelvic pain
. J
Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 2001, 8:542-4.
10.1016/s1074-3804(05)60618-4
2023 Klein et al. Cureus 15(4): e37825. DOI 10.7759/cureus.37825
4
of
4
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.