Comparison of electrocauterization and cryosurgery for the treatment of benign disease of the uterine cervix

Donald R. Ostergard, D R Ostergard, D E Townsend, Duane E. Townsend, F M Hirose, Frank M. Hirose
Obstetrics & Gynecology · 1969 · vol. 33(1) , pp. 58–63 · doi:10.1097/00006250-196901000-00010 · PMID:5773872 · W2021510431
Other OA: closed CC0 ⤵ 1 in-corpus citation
View on OpenAlex View on PubMed View at publisher
⚙ AI-generated summary by qwen3.7-flash, 2026-08-27 ⓘ

This paper compares electrocauterization and cryosurgery for treating benign disease of the uterine cervix, without addressing endometriosis or adenomyosis.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Comparison of Electrocauterization and Cryosurgery for the Treatment of Benign Disease of the Uterine Cervix: PDF Only

My notes (saved in your browser only)

MeSH descriptors

Cautery Cautery Cryosurgery Cryosurgery Uterine Cervicitis Female Humans Uterine Cervicitis Uterine Hemorrhage Uterine Hemorrhage Wound Healing

Citation neighborhood (sparse)

Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.

Cited by (1)

Cited by (1)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-10-08T21:57:54.098323+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK