Molecular determinants of the recognition of ulipristal acetate by oxo-steroid receptors
Petit-Topin I,
I Petit-Topin,
M Fay,
Fay M,
Resche-Rigon M,
M Resche-Rigon,
A Ulmann,
Ulmann A,
Gainer E,
E Gainer,
Rafestin-Oblin ME,
M-E Rafestin-Oblin,
J Fagart,
Fagart J
Other
OA: closed
public-domain-us
⚙
AI-generated summary
by qwen3.7-flash, 2026-09-09
ⓘ
X-ray crystallography and molecular modeling reveal that specific contacts with the progesterone receptor ligand-binding domain account for ulipristal acetate’s high selectivity and lower glucocorticoid receptor inactivation, offering insights for designing improved antagonists for endometriosis treatment.
Abstract
The human progesterone receptor (PR) plays a key role in reproductive function in women. PR antagonists have numerous applications in female health care including regular and emergency contraception, and treatment of hormone-related pathological conditions such as breast cancer, endometriosis, and leiomyoma. The main factor limiting their long-term administration is the fact that they cross-bind to other oxo-steroid receptors. Ulipristal acetate (UPA), a highly potent PR antagonist, has recently come onto the market and is much more selective for PR than the other oxo-steroid receptors (androgen, AR, glucocorticoid, GR, and mineralocorticoid, MR receptors) and, remarkably, it displays lower GR-inactivating potency than RU486. We adopted a structural approach to characterizing the binding of UPA to the oxo-steroid receptors at the molecular level. We solved the X-ray crystal structure of the ligand-binding domain (LBD) of the human PR complexed with UPA and a peptide from the transcriptional corepressor SMRT. We used the X-ray crystal structure of the GR in its antagonist conformation to dock UPA within its ligand-binding cavity. Finally, we generated three-dimensional models of the LBD of androgen and mineralocorticoid receptors (AR and MR) in an antagonist conformation and docked UPA within them. Comparing the structures revealed that the network of stabilizing contacts between the UPA C11 aryl group and the LBD is responsible for its high PR antagonist potency. It also showed that it is the inability of UPA to contact Gln642 in GR that explains why it has lower potency in inactivating GR than RU486. Finally, we found that the binding pockets of AR and MR are too small to accommodate UPA, and allowed us to propose that the extremely low sensitivity of MR to UPA is due to inappropriate interactions with the C11 substituent. All these findings open new avenues for designing new PR antagonist compounds displaying greater selectivity.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Condition tags
endometriosis
MeSH descriptors
Hormone Antagonists
Models, Molecular
Models, Molecular
Norpregnadienes
Receptors, Androgen
Receptors, Mineralocorticoid
Receptors, Progesterone
Binding Sites
Binding Sites
Crystallography, X-Ray
Crystallography, X-Ray
HEK293 Cells
HEK293 Cells
Hormone Antagonists
Hormone Antagonists
Humans
Humans
Norpregnadienes
Norpregnadienes
Protein Conformation
Citation neighborhood
(no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet.
The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to
``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI
matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation
reconcile pass to retry.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-10-21T06:16:17.486033+00:00
- pubmed
- last seen: 2026-10-08T21:14:18.823929+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-05-14T19:30:52.867331+00:00
License: public-domain-us
· commercial use OK
· attribution required
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine