Comparison of laparoscopy and laparotomy in managing hemodynamically stable patients with ruptured corpus luteum with hemoperitoneum

Non-randomised trial OA: closed CC0 ⤵ 6 in-corpus citations
View on OpenAlex View on PubMed View at publisher
⚙ AI-generated summary by gemini-2.5-flash-lite, 2026-08-01 ⓘ

Laparoscopic surgery for ruptured corpus luteum with hemoperitoneum offered a shorter hospital stay and similar safety outcomes compared to laparotomy in hemodynamically stable women.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To compare differences between laparoscopy and laparotomy in managing women ruptured corpus luteum with hemoperitoneum. DESIGN: Three-year, prospective, nonrandomized study (Canadian Task Force classification II-2). SETTING: University-affiliated regional hospital. PATIENTS: Sixty hemodynamically stable women. INTERVENTION: Laparoscopic surgery (30 women) and laparotomy (30). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Laparoscopic surgery had significant advantages over laparotomy, including shorter hospital stay (55.33 +/- 7.67 vs 97.77 +/- 14.45 hrs, p < 0.001) without increased adverse events. Laparoscopic surgery also showed trends of shorter operating time, improved wound care, and less postoperative pain. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopy surgery for diagnosis and treatment of women with ruptured hemorrhagic corpus luteum appears superior to laparotomy. We suggest that surgeons try laparoscopy first as a diagnostic and probably therapeutic procedure.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

MeSH descriptors

Hemoperitoneum Laparoscopy Laparotomy Ovarian Cysts Adult Female Hemodynamics Hemoperitoneum Hemoperitoneum Humans Laparoscopy Laparotomy Ovarian Cysts Ovarian Cysts Ovarian Cysts Prospective Studies Rupture, Spontaneous

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (28)

Cited by (6)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-10-08T21:02:19.201584+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK