A messy substance: Mediating the stigma and lived experience of endometriosis through participatory design

In: Proceedings of DRS · 2026 · doi:10.21606/drs.2026.2583 · W7163042183
article OA: hybrid CC0
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-06

This study used participatory design workshops with individuals with endometriosis and doctors to co-create artefacts that mediated embodied pain and clinical perspectives, fostering mutual empathy and new discursive practices for care.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-06 · read from full text

This paper examines how participatory and speculative design can mediate communicative and relational gaps between patients with endometriosis and gynaecologists, particularly in the context of stigma, taboo, diagnostic uncertainty, and epistemic tensions. Using a Research through Design approach, the authors ran three co-design workshops with six individuals with endometriosis and five doctors, who produced analogue artefacts (e.g., empathy maps, body maps, clay representations, written narratives, speculative futures, and posters) to materialise embodied pain, emotional burden, and clinical perspectives. The workshops showed that experiential and clinical knowledge could meet through material and narrative mediation, fostering mutual empathy and discursive practices of care beyond conventional consultation settings, while also revealing areas of agreement and divergence. This paper is centrally about endometriosis — it focuses on participatory design methods to communicate the lived experience and stigma of endometriosis between patients and clinicians.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Endometriosis is a chronic condition often surrounded by taboo, silence, and misunderstanding. Although diagnostic uncertainty and epistemic tensions shape endometriosis care, little is known about how design can address the communicative and relational gaps between patients and gynaecologists. This article investigates how participatory and speculative design can support communication between these groups. Using a Research through Design approach, three co-design workshops were conducted with six individuals with endometriosis and five doctors. Participants created analogue artefacts including empathy maps, body maps, clay representations, written narratives, speculative futures and collective posters that materialised embodied pain, emotional burden and clinical perspectives. The workshops revealed how experiential and clinical knowledge can meet through material and narrative mediation, enabling mutual empathy and discursive practices of care beyond conventional consultation settings. The artefacts acted as mediators that articulated aspects of endometriosis that are difficult to verbalise, while highlighting resonances and divergencies between patients and doctors.
Full text 3,109 characters · extracted from oa-html · 2 sections · click to expand

Abstract

Endometriosis is a chronic condition often surrounded by taboo, silence, and misunderstanding. Although diagnostic uncertainty and epistemic tensions shape endometriosis care, little is known about how design can address the communicative and relational gaps between patients and gynaecologists. This article investigates how participatory and speculative design can support communication between these groups. Using a Research through Design approach, three co-design workshops were conducted with six individuals with endometriosis and five doctors. Participants created analogue artefacts including empathy maps, body maps, clay representations, written narratives, speculative futures and collective posters that materialised embodied pain, emotional burden and clinical perspectives. The workshops revealed how experiential and clinical knowledge can meet through material and narrative mediation, enabling mutual empathy and discursive practices of care beyond conventional consultation settings. The artefacts acted as mediators that articulated aspects of endometriosis that are difficult to verbalise, while highlighting resonances and divergencies between patients and doctors.

Keywords

participatory design, feminist design, endometriosis, taboo DOI https://doi.org/10.21606/drs.2026.2583 Citation Vaz-Pires, C., and Melo, R. (2026) A messy substance: Mediating the stigma and lived experience of endometriosis through participatory design, in Simeone, L., Gray, C. M., Verhoeven, A., de Götzen, A., Bakırlıoğlu, Y., Zohar, H., Stead, M., and Buwert, P. (eds.), DRS2026: Edinburgh, 8–12 June, Edinburgh, United Kingdom. https://doi.org/10.21606/drs.2026.2583 Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License Included in A messy substance: Mediating the stigma and lived experience of endometriosis through participatory design Endometriosis is a chronic condition often surrounded by taboo, silence, and misunderstanding. Although diagnostic uncertainty and epistemic tensions shape endometriosis care, little is known about how design can address the communicative and relational gaps between patients and gynaecologists. This article investigates how participatory and speculative design can support communication between these groups. Using a Research through Design approach, three co-design workshops were conducted with six individuals with endometriosis and five doctors. Participants created analogue artefacts including empathy maps, body maps, clay representations, written narratives, speculative futures and collective posters that materialised embodied pain, emotional burden and clinical perspectives. The workshops revealed how experiential and clinical knowledge can meet through material and narrative mediation, enabling mutual empathy and discursive practices of care beyond conventional consultation settings. The artefacts acted as mediators that articulated aspects of endometriosis that are difficult to verbalise, while highlighting resonances and divergencies between patients and doctors.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Condition tags

endometriosis

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-04T00:00:01.174412+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK