Comparison of DNA methylation profiles of human embryos cultured in either uninterrupted or interrupted incubators
Other
OA: closed
AI-generated summary
This study compared DNA methylation profiles of human eight-cell embryos cultured in uninterrupted time-lapse imaging versus interrupted standard incubators, finding similar genome-wide patterns and minimal differential gene expression.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
PURPOSE: We aimed to compare the DNA methylation profiles of human embryos cultured in uninterrupted or interrupted incubators.
METHODS: This study included 9 women, ≤ 30 years old (range: 20-30 years), without a history of genetic diseases or smoking, undergoing ICSI treatment, and each woman donated one oocyte. Embryos were randomly assigned to culture in either time-lapse imaging or standard incubators after ICSI. We compared the DNA methylation profiles of human eight-cell embryos cultured in uninterrupted condition using time-lapse imaging (TLI) incubator (EmbryoScope) to those cultured in interrupted culture model using standard incubators (SI, G185 K-System). Nine single-cell whole-genome bisulfite sequencing (WGBS) datasets were analyzed, including four SI-cultured embryos and five TLI-cultured embryos at the eight-cell stage.
RESULTS: A total of 581,140,020 and 732,348,182 clean reads were generated from the TLI and SI groups, respectively. TLI-cultured embryos had similar genome-wide methylation patterns to SI-cultured embryos. There were no significant differences in the methylation and transcription levels of transposable elements and imprinted control regions. Although a total of 198 differentially methylated genes (DMGs) were identified, only five DMGs had significantly different transcription levels between the two groups.
CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to compare the DNA methylation profiles of embryos cultured in TLI and SI and will provide a foundation for evaluating the safety of TLI application in assisted reproductive technologies. However, further study with a larger cohort of samples was needed for the data validation.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
MeSH descriptors
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-10-25T09:32:14.900964+00:00
- pubmed
- last seen: 2026-10-08T21:37:45.756918+00:00