[Survey among gynaecologists and surgeons on rectocele]

Observational OA: closed CC0
View on OpenAlex View on PubMed
⚙ AI-generated summary by qwen3.7-flash, 2026-10-13 ⓘ

A survey of gynaecologists and surgeons reveals no consensus on the nomenclature, diagnosis, or treatment of rectocele, highlighting the need for joint guidelines to improve multidisciplinary cooperation.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Provide insight into how gynaecologists and surgeons name, diagnose and treat a rectocele and identify the differences between these two professional groups. DESIGN: Questionnaire survey. METHODS: We sent an online survey with 16 multiple-choice questions to gynaecologists and surgeons from two national working groups. RESULTS: There is no discernible consensus on nomenclature, diagnostics and treatment. Gynaecologists and surgeons each choose their own approach. CONCLUSION: It is in the patient's interest to draw up a joint guideline; however, multidisciplinary cooperation is only possible if gynaecologists and surgeons speak the same language.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

MeSH descriptors

Gynecologic Surgical Procedures Practice Patterns, Physicians' Rectocele Rectocele Surgeons Female Gynecologic Surgical Procedures Gynecology Gynecology Health Surveys Humans Laxatives Laxatives Male Practice Guidelines as Topic Practice Patterns, Physicians' Rectocele Surgeons Surveys and Questionnaires

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-10-08T21:14:02.509446+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK