Power sources in endoscopic surgery

C Sutton, Sutton C
Current opinion in obstetrics & gynecology · 1995 · vol. 7(4) , pp. 248–56 · doi:10.1097/00001703-199508000-00004 · PMID:7578962
Review OA: closed
Full text JSON View on PubMed View at publisher
⚙ AI-generated summary by qwen3.7-flash, 2026-09-11 ⓘ

This paper reviews various endoscopic power sources, noting that while technology has advanced from early instruments to sophisticated ultrasonic and laser systems, clinical outcomes depend more on surgeon skill than the specific energy source employed.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

⚙ AI-generated deep summary by qwen3.7-flash, 2026-08-25 · read from full text ⓘ

This review examines the evolution and variety of power sources utilized in endoscopic surgery, contrasting early crude instrumentation with modern sophisticated tools like ultrasonic energy, lasers, and advanced electrosurgical systems. The author notes that while technical capabilities have improved significantly, the selection of a specific device remains largely dependent on the surgeon's personal comfort and proficiency rather than objective superiority. Clinical outcomes are described as being more closely tied to individual surgical skill and knowledge of tissue interaction complications than to the specific energy modality employed. This paper is centrally about endometriosis — specifically laparoscopic excision of deep infiltrating lesions.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

The power sources used in endoscopic surgery are varied and numerous, and will continue to improve as technology progresses. Early attempts at operative laparoscopy were crude, limited by the available instrumentation, and tended to be frustrating: scissors that had to be frequently sharpened and endocoagulators that took a seemingly interminable time to achieve their tissue effect. New developements in ultrasonic energy and different wavelengths of laser energy are used alongside increasingly sophisticated electrosurgical tools, employing both monopolar and bipolar systems, and innovative delivery systems such as the argon beam coagulator and the Helica Thermal Coagulator. All of these systems have their advocates and their detractors, but in the end the choice of power source is determined by the type of equipment that the operator feels most comfortable with. The surgeon must have a detailed knowledge of the physical concepts required to generate the power source, and be able to understand the complications that can be created by the energy, how to avoid them, how and to deal with them if they occur. Although there are subtle differences in the reaction of the different energy sources with human tissue, the clinical outcome appears to be much the same, and depends more on the skill of the individual surgeon than the power source employed.
Full text 1,419 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Power sources in endoscopic surgery - Christopher Sutton The power sources used in endoscopic surgery are varied and numerous, and will continue to improve as technology progresses. Early attempts at operative laparoscopy were crude, limited by the available instrumentation, and tended to be frustrating: scissors that had to be frequently sharpened and endocoagulators that took a seemingly interminable time to achieve their tissue effect. New developements in ultrasonic energy and different wavelengths of laser energy are used alongside increasingly sophisticated electrosurgical tools, employing both monopolar and bipolar systems, and innovative delivery systems such as the argon beam coagulator and the Helica Thermal Coagulator. All of these systems have their advocates and their detractors, but in the end the choice of power source is determined by the type of equipment that the operator feels most comfortable with. The surgeon must have a detailed knowledge of the physical concepts required to generate the power source, and be able to understand the complications that can be created by the energy, how to avoid them, how and to deal with them if they occur. Although there are subtle differences in the reaction of the different energy sources with human tissue, the clinical outcome appears to be much the same, and depends more on the skill of the individual surgeon than the power source employed

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

⚙ Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback ⓘ

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

MeSH descriptors

Electric Power Supplies Endoscopes Electrosurgery Electrosurgery Endometriosis Endometriosis Female Humans Laser Therapy Laser Therapy Surgical Instruments Ultrasonics

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-10-18T09:30:06.152893+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-10-08T21:58:54.395363+00:00