Comparison of microlaparoscopy and conventional laparoscopy for tubal sterilization under local anesthesia with mild sedation

RCT OA: closed CC0
View on OpenAlex View on PubMed View at publisher
⚙ AI-generated summary by gemini-2.5-flash-lite, 2026-06-07 ⓘ

This study compared microlaparoscopy and conventional laparoscopy for tubal sterilization under local anesthesia with mild sedation, assessing their outcomes.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To compare tubal sterilization performed by microlaparoscopy and conventional laparoscopy. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized trial (Canadian Task Force classification I). SETTING: Gazi University School of Medicine. PATIENTS: Twenty women undergoing surgical sterilization. INTERVENTION: Ten sterilizations by conventional laparoscopy and 10 by microlaparoscopy. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The techniques were comparable in quality of visualization, operating time, amount of drugs used for sedation and local anesthesia, and intraoperative pain scores. However, the postoperative analgesic requirement was significantly less in women treated by by microlaparoscopy. CONCLUSION: Tubal sterilization by microlaparoscopy does not differ greatly from conventional laparoscopic sterilization.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

MeSH descriptors

Anesthesia, Local Laparoscopy Microsurgery Procedural Sedation Sterilization, Tubal Adult Female Humans Laparoscopy Postoperative Pain Prospective Studies Sterilization, Tubal

Citation neighborhood (sparse)

Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.

Cites (1)

References (13)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-05-14T06:54:16.401154+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-10-08T20:59:59.992071+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK