[The implantation of bipolar coagulation to remove endometriosis foci]

Ginekologia polska · 2001 · vol. 72(5) , pp. 380–4 · PMID:11526779 · W2414860795
Other OA: closed CC0
View on OpenAlex View on PubMed
⚙ AI-generated summary by gemini-2.5-flash-lite, 2026-06-08 ⓘ

This study assessed bipolar coagulation for endometriosis removal and found optimal results with a bipolar ball at 20-30 W, with no observed side effects.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

The paper compares the results of bipolar coagulation bey means of ERBE ICC 300 diatermy coagulator and WISAP endocoagulator. The results of both types of coagulation were assessed with reference to the changes occurring on peritoneum ligamenti sacro-uterini, Douglas pouch and ovary. The best results of endometriosis foci coagulation were obtained with bipolar ball at 20-30 W; no side effects or feelings of malaise were observed in patients just after the operation or over a longer period of convalescence.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Condition tags

endometriosis

MeSH descriptors

Electrocoagulation Endometriosis Pelvic Inflammatory Disease Adult Adult Electrocoagulation Electrocoagulation Electrodes, Implanted Electrodes, Implanted Endometriosis Endometriosis Female Female Humans Humans Laparoscopy Laparoscopy Laparoscopy Pelvic Inflammatory Disease Pelvic Inflammatory Disease

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-10-24T06:12:55.650802+00:00
openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-10-08T21:00:08.490831+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK