[Staging and grading experiences in ovarian carcinoma and their prognostic value]

Bartl W, W Bartl, H Janisch, Janisch H, S. Szalay, Szalay S, T Szepesi, Szepesi T, Tatra G, G Tatra, Breitenecker G, G Breitenecker
Gynakologische Rundschau · 1982 · vol. 22(2) , pp. 158–64 · PMID:6286427
Other public-domain-us
Limited metadata. Only one source feed has indexed this record so far — no abstract, full text, or open-access copy is available through Endo Lab. The publisher is the canonical location for the actual content. If you have institutional access, use "Find at my library".
View on PubMed
⚙ AI-generated summary by gemini-2.5-flash-lite, 2026-08-03 ⓘ

This study investigated the current staging and grading practices for ovarian carcinoma and evaluated their effectiveness in predicting patient outcomes.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Condition tags

endometriosis

MeSH descriptors

Carcinoma Ovarian Neoplasms Adenocarcinoma Adenocarcinoma Adenocarcinoma Adenocarcinoma, Mucinous Adenocarcinoma, Mucinous Adenocarcinoma, Mucinous Carcinoma Carcinoma Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Female Female Humans Humans Neoplasm Staging Neoplasm Staging Ovarian Neoplasms

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-10-25T09:32:14.900964+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-10-08T21:58:08.863946+00:00
License: public-domain-us · commercial use OK · attribution required
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine