‘A glimmer of hope’: perceptions, barriers, and drivers for medicinal cannabis use amongst Australian and New Zealand people with endometriosis – a qualitative study

Justin Sinclair, Jason Abbott, Antonina Mikocka-Walus, Antonina Mikocka‐Walus, Cecilia Ng, Cecilia H M Ng, Jerome Sarris, Subhadra Evans, Mike Armour
Reproduction & fertility · 2023 · vol. 4(4) · doi:10.1530/raf-23-0049 · PMID:37855429 · W4387503828
article OA: diamond CC0 ⤵ 3 in-corpus citations
📄 Open PDF View on OpenAlex View on PubMed View at publisher
⚙ AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-08 ⓘ

Australians and New Zealanders with endometriosis are open to using medicinal cannabis due to inadequate symptom management, but cite cost, drug testing laws, stigma, and provider education as barriers.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Previous quantitative research has shown that cannabis use, mostly illicit, is used for symptom management amongst those with endometriosis living in Australia or New Zealand, but the drivers and barriers for use of legal, medicinal cannabis in this population are currently unclear. This study sought to investigate, via online focus groups, the perceptions, barriers, drivers, and experiences associated with cannabis use, whether legal or illicit, amongst 37 Australians and New Zealanders, aged 18–55, with a medical diagnosis of endometriosis. Previous cannabis usage was not required to participate. Discussion topics included strategies employed to manage symptoms, exploration of current medications, previous use of cannabis for pain management, and interest in using medicinal cannabis as a management strategy. Participants with moderate-to-severe symptoms of medically diagnosed endometriosis reported inadequacies with their current medical and self-management strategies and were inclined to try medicinal cannabis, both as part of their medical management and as part of a clinical trial. Barriers to medicinal cannabis adoption identified in this cohort included high costs of legal cannabis products, lack of clarity and fairness in current roadside drug testing laws and workplace drug testing policies, concern over the impact of stigma affecting familial, social and workplace life domains, and subsequent judgement and the lack of education/engagement from their medical providers regarding cannabis use. Given the interest in medicinal cannabis and the reported lack of effective symptom management, clinical trials are urgently required to determine the potential role that medicinal cannabis may play in reducing the symptoms of endometriosis. Lay summary Previous research has demonstrated that cannabis, either medically or illicitly obtained, is being used to manage the pain and associated symptoms of endometriosis in people across Australia and New Zealand. However, there are no clinical trials yet to determine how safe and effective medicinal cannabis might be for endometriosis symptoms. Before we design our clinical trial we wanted to get input from people in the community who have endometriosis to understand what kind of barriers there might be to both being in a clinical trial and using medicinal cannabis for their symptoms. Overall, the vast majority of participants were open to trying medicinal cannabis as a management option, driven mainly by inadequacies in their current medical and self-management strategies. Several barriers to adoption were identified, including the high costs of legal cannabis products, current drug driving laws or workplace drug testing policies, and the negative stigma around cannabis usage.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Condition tags

endometriosis

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (65)

Cited by (3)

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-06-04T01:30:01.192114+00:00
openalex
last seen: 2026-06-04T00:00:01.174412+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-05-27T00:33:20.758796+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK