Beyond vein diameter: pain phenotyping complements updated diagnostic criteria for female pelvic venous disorders

Other OA: gold CC-BY-4.0
⚙ AI-generated summary by qwen3.7-flash, 2026-10-05 ⓘ

This paper argues that pain phenotyping complements updated diagnostic criteria for female pelvic venous disorders, extending beyond vein diameter to improve clinical assessment.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

⚙ AI-generated deep summary by qwen3.7-flash, 2026-09-24 · read from full text ⓘ

This paper presents a case series derived from clinical practice images and retrospective institutional data to evaluate female pelvic venous disorders. The authors argue that pain phenotyping serves as a necessary complement to updated diagnostic criteria, moving beyond the traditional reliance on vein diameter measurements alone. No specific patient cohort or statistical analysis is reported, as the work is based on imaging observations from the corresponding author's practice without external funding or competing interests. Relevance to endometriosis: listed as one indication for GnRH antagonists, though the paper's main focus is uterine fibroids.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Full text 889 characters · extracted from epmc-fulltextxml · 7 sections · click to expand

Ack

Not applicable.

Data

All imaging and clinical information were retrospectively retrieved from the institutional PACS along with clinical observations acquired.

Funding

This study was not supported by any funding.

Fn Group

Publisher’s Note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Authors’

All authors contributed to conceptualization, writing, images analysis and review. This case series images originate from the clinical practice from the corresponding author.

Declarations

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors. For this type of study, consent for publication is not required. The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Associated Data

All imaging and clinical information were retrospectively retrieved from the institutional PACS along with clinical observations acquired.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

⚙ Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: epmc-fulltextxml ⓘ

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

SciLite annotations

organisms 2
human multicellular animals

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-10-11T09:27:45.537177+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-10-08T21:56:53.972558+00:00
scilite
last seen: 2026-09-27T09:57:59.810255+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0 · commercial use OK · attribution required
Per Europe PMC