The prevalence of adenomyosis in an infertile population: a cross-sectional study

other OA: closed public-domain-us ⤵ 2 in-corpus citations
View on PubMed View at publisher
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-07

This cross-sectional study found a 6.6% prevalence of adenomyosis in infertile women ≤41 years old, with higher rates in women aged ≥40, diffuse adenomyosis, and associated factors like older age, higher BMI, dysmenorrhea, and endometriomas.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

RESEARCH QUESTION: Adenomyosis has been reported in a high proportion (24.4%) of infertile women, but this may be over-representative. What is the exact prevalence of adenomyosis in an infertility clinic population? DESIGN: In this cross-sectional study, 320 infertile women ≤41 years of age attending the infertility clinic of a university teaching hospital were screened by two-dimensional transvaginal ultrasound (2D-TVS) to look for the sonographic markers of adenomyosis, with subsequent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) if suspected. Additionally, the adenomyosis subtype (I-IV) was determined from MRI geography (Kishi classification). Comparisons between women with and without adenomyosis were carried out. RESULTS: Adenomyosis was found by 2D-TVS in 24 cases (7.5%) and confirmed by MRI in 21 (6.6%). The mean age of the group was 29.2 ± 4.7 years. The most frequently observed sonographic finding (58.3% of cases) was asymmetrical myometrial thickening. The majority of MRI-confirmed cases (85.7%) had diffuse adenomyosis. A significantly higher prevalence was found in women ≥40 compared with women <40 years old (40.0% versus 4.9%, respectively; P < 0.0001). Adenomyotic women had significantly higher mean age (32.7 ± 3.0 versus 28.6 ± 4.4 years; P < 0.00001), body mass index (31.3 ± 2.7 versus 28.7 ± 3.3 kg/m2; P < 0.0001), suffered more dysmenorrhoea (38% versus 17%; P = 0.02) and had more ovarian endometriomas (19% versus 6%; P = 0.03) than those without adenomyosis. CONCLUSION: The observed prevalence of adenomyosis detected de novo by 2D-TVS in a population of young infertile women (7.5%) should alert gynaecologists and ultrasonographers to look for the features of adenomyosis when scanning such patients.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Condition tags

adenomyosisdysmenorrheainfertility

MeSH descriptors

Adenomyosis Infertility, Female Uterus Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adult Comorbidity Cross-Sectional Studies Female Humans Infertility, Female Infertility, Female Magnetic Resonance Imaging Myometrium Myometrium Prevalence Ultrasonography Uterus

Citation neighborhood (sparse)

Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.

Cited by (2)

Cited by (2)

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-06-04T01:30:01.192114+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-05-13T22:22:05.164793+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-14T19:30:52.867331+00:00
License: public-domain-us · commercial use OK · attribution required
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine