Patient-Reported Outcomes after Robotic Resection of Deep Endometriosis of the Bowel
A retrospective review of 41 patients undergoing robotic resection for bowel endometriosis found significant postoperative improvements in pain scores and bowel function satisfaction, with most patients reporting reduced pain impact on work at one year.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
This retrospective cohort study evaluated patient-reported functional outcomes following multidisciplinary robotic resection for deep endometriosis involving the bowel at a single tertiary academic institution. The analysis included 41 patients who completed preoperative and postoperative surveys, revealing significant reductions in overall pain scores and specific menstrual-related pain from baseline to 12 months post-surgery. Additionally, the proportion of patients reporting that pain impacted their work decreased substantially, while satisfaction with bowel function improved significantly over the same period. Despite these positive findings, the authors noted limitations including a low response rate at the 12-month mark, a retrospective design, and limited demographic diversity within the patient population. This paper is centrally about endometriosis — specifically focusing on surgical management and quality of life outcomes for deep infiltrating disease affecting the bowel.
Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
Full text
2,290 characters
· extracted from
oa-doi-fallback
· 5 sections
· click to expand
Background
Objective
Results
Limitations
Conclusion
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-11-09T06:14:10.326338+00:00
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-11-09T06:05:26.968455+00:00
- pubmed
- last seen: 2026-11-09T06:07:08.518963+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-11-09T06:31:04.326590+00:00
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine