Idées reçues sur l'endométriose
This study investigated the hypothesis that sexual violence may contribute to endometriosis through chronic inflammation, finding a significant correlation between pelvic pain and history of sexual violence but no direct link to endometriosis itself.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
This French chapter discusses the idea that sexual violence could contribute to endometriosis, framed by population data from the INED Virage survey (2020) reporting that about 15% of women in France report having experienced sexual violence during their lives. It explains a mechanistic hypothesis linking childhood/adolescent stressors to long-term alterations in stress responses, chronic inflammation, and later psychosomatic symptoms such as pelvic pain, noting that studies exploring a direct link to endometriosis have produced contradictory results. It highlights a recent study of 168 women with endometriosis and 103 without that found a significant association between pelvic pain and histories of sexual violence in childhood or adolescence, with the correlation observed regardless of whether endometriosis was present, which the chapter uses to argue that endometriosis itself was not associated with sexual violence. The chapter acknowledges that findings across studies differ and provides this as a key limitation of the evidence. This paper is centrally about endometriosis — it reviews evidence and hypotheses connecting sexual violence, chronic inflammation, and pelvic pain in endometriosis, emphasizing a debated lack of a direct association.
Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works
Full text
2,139 characters
· extracted from
oa-doi-fallback
· click to expand
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2024) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-06-04T00:00:01.174412+00:00