Clinical study of different therapeutic protocols in treating endometriosis
RCT
OA: closed
CC0
AI-generated summary
A randomized trial comparing danazol with Chinese herbal decoctions found no difference in overall efficacy, although Hongteng Decoction alone or combined with enema reduced dysmenorrhea and ectopic endometrium.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
Objective To compare the clinical efficacy of three different therapeutic protocols on endometriosis.Methods A multi-center randomized controlled study was made.One hundred and seventeen cases of endometriosis were randomly divided into Hongteng Decoction group,Enema Decoction group,Hongteng Decoction plus Enema Decoction group,and danazol group.Clinical effect,scores of symptoms and ectopic endometrium were observed.ResultsThere was no difference in the clinical efficacy between the four groups(P0.05).The scores of dysmenorrhea right after treatment and after three-month drug withdrawal in the three Chinese medicine group were lower than those before treatment(P0.05).Ectopic endometrium in the Hongteng Decotiongroup and the Hongteng Decoctionplus Enema Decoctiongroup were all reduced(P0.05).Conclusions Enema Decoction and Hongteng Decoction may improve clinical symptoms of endometriosis,reduce ectopic endometrium;oral Hongteng Decoction with possible Enema Decoction is superior to single Enema Decoction.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Condition tags
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
License: CC0
· commercial use OK