Abstract
Purpose
While breastfeeding is known to impact unassisted conception, its effect on fertility treatment outcomes remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of breastfeeding on in-vitro fertilization (IVF) frozen embryo transfer (FET) outcomes.
Methods
A retrospective cohort study at a single, urban, Canadian Fertility center, including women who underwent an FET(2015–2023). Breastfeeding women (study group) were compared to non-breastfeeding controls, matched 1:1 for age, treatment protocol, and year. We compared outcomes between the two groups. Primary outcomes were pregnancy rate (PR), clinical pregnancy rate (CPR),and live birth rate (LBR). Secondary outcomes included peak endometrial thickness prior to progesterone supplementation, biochemical PR and miscarriage rate. Multivariate logistic regression controlled for confounders. Two sub-analyses within the breastfeeding group examined treatment outcomes by breastfeeding duration (≤ 12 months; > 12 months) and prolactin levels (normal;elevated).
Results
Overall, 118 women met inclusion criteria (59 breastfeeding, 59 controls). Breastfeeding women, compared to controls,were characterized by a younger median age at initial oocyte collection (34.8 years(31.9–37.11) vs. 35.85 years(33.2–39.2),p = 0.044); higher median parity (1(1–1) vs. 0(0–1), p < 0.0001);and higher rates of irregular cycles (35.59% vs. 18.64%,p = 0.016);and elevated prolactin levels (16.95% vs. 1.69%,p = 0.003). Utilizing multivariate logistic regression adjusting for breastfeeding status,parity, age at initial oocyte collection, and cycle regularity, only maternal age at oocyte collection was associated with PR (adjusted odds ratio 0.84, 95% confidence interval 0.75–0.94,p = 0.003). Both sub-analyses revealed similar PRs, CPRs and LBRs between groups.
Conclusions
Breastfeeding during an FET cycle was not associated with treatment outcomes, including PR,CPR, or LBR, providing cautious reassurance to physicians and patients.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
All data supporting the findings of this study are available within the paper.
References
Gross K, Spaeth A, Dratva J, Zemp Stutz E.SWIFS - Swiss infant feeding study. - Google Search [Internet]. [cited 2023 Oct 5]. Available from: https://www.google.com/search?q=Gross+K%2C+Spaeth+A%2C+Dratva+J%2C+Zemp+Stutz+E.SWIFS+-+Swiss+infant+feeding+study.&oq=Gross+K%2C+Spaeth+A%2C+Dratva+J%2C+Zemp+Stutz+E.SWIFS+-+Swiss+infant+feeding++study.&aqs=chrome..69i57j69i60l2.213j0j4&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8
Horta BL, Loret De Mola C, Victora CG. Long-term consequences of breastfeeding on cholesterol, obesity, systolic blood pressure and type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Paediatr [Internet]. 2015 [cited 2023 Oct 5];104:30–7. Available from: https://pubmed-ncbi-nlm-nih-gov.proxy3.library.mcgill.ca/26192560/
Breastfeeding [Internet]. [cited 2023 Oct 5]. Available from: https://www.who.int/health-topics/breastfeeding#tab=tab_2
Weiss YT, Tamir SO, Globus O, Marom T. Protective Characteristics of Human Breast Milk on Early Childhood Otitis Media: A Narrative Review. Breastfeed Med [Internet]. 2024 [cited 2025 Feb 6];19:73–80. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38386988/
Ahlers-Schmidt CR, Schunn C, Hervey AM, Torres M. Safe sleep crib clinics: Promoting risk reduction strategies for sudden unexpected infant death. PEC innovation [Internet]. 2024 [cited 2025 Feb 6];6. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39845574/
Ogbo FA, Page A, Idoko J, Claudio F, Agho KE. Diarrhoea and Suboptimal Feeding Practices in Nigeria: Evidence from the National Household Surveys. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2025 Feb 6];30:346–55. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27009844/
Olapeju B, Bride M, Wamala M, Atobrah D, Lee EH, Hendrickson ZM. Antenatal care and breastfeeding practices in Sub-Saharan Africa: an analysis of demographic and health surveys. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth [Internet]. 2025 [cited 2025 Feb 6];25:77. Available from: http://creativecom-mons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Horta BL, Victora CG. Long-term effects of breastfeeding … A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW …. 2013 [cited 2025 Feb 6]; Available from: www.who.int
MS K, R K. Optimal duration of exclusive breastfeeding. Cochrane Database Syst Rev [Internet]. 2002 [cited 2023 Oct 5];5:30–1. Available from: https://pubmed-ncbi-nlm-nih-gov.proxy3.library.mcgill.ca/11869667/
Newborn and Infant Breastfeeding [Internet]. [cited 2025 Feb 6]. Available from: https://www.aap.org/en/patient-care/newborn-and-infant-nutrition/newborn-and-infant-breastfeeding/
Maiter D. Prolactinoma and pregnancy: From the wish of conception to lactation. Ann Endocrinol (Paris) [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2023 Oct 5];77:128–34. Available from: https://pubmed-ncbi-nlm-nih-gov.proxy3.library.mcgill.ca/27130071/
Sopelak VM, Whitworth NS, Norman PF, Cowan BD. Bromocriptine inhibition of anesthesia-induced hyperprolactinemia: effect on serum and follicular fluid hormones, oocyte fertilization, and embryo cleavage rates during in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril [Internet]. 1989 [cited 2024 Mar 27];52:627–32. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2806601/
Reinthaller A, Bieglmayer C, Deutinger J, Csaicsich P. Transient hyperprolactinemia during cycle stimulation: influence on the endocrine response and fertilization rate of human oocytes and effects of bromocriptine treatment. Fertil Steril [Internet]. 1988 [cited 2024 Mar 27];49:432–6. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3342894/
Iancu ME, Albu AI, Albu DN. Prolactin Relationship with Fertility and In Vitro Fertilization Outcomes-A Review of the Literature. Pharmaceuticals (Basel) [Internet]. 2023 [cited 2024 Mar 27];16. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36678618/
IVF/Fertility drugs and Breastfeeding - The Breastfeeding Network [Internet]. [cited 2024 Feb 11]. Available from: https://www.breastfeedingnetwork.org.uk/factsheet/ivf/
Majumdar A, Mangal NS. Hyperprolactinemia. J Hum Reprod Sci [Internet]. 2013 [cited 2024 Mar 27];6:168–75. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24347930/
Freeman ME, Kanyicska B, Lerant A, Nagy G. Prolactin: structure, function, and regulation of secretion. Physiol Rev [Internet]. 2000 [cited 2024 Mar 27];80:1523–631. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11015620/
Rossi AGZ, Soares JM, Motta ELA, Simões MJ, Oliveira-Filho RM, Haidar MA, et al. Metoclopramide-induced hyperprolactinemia affects mouse endometrial morphology. Gynecol Obstet Invest [Internet]. 2002 [cited 2024 Feb 11];54:185–90. Available from: https://pubmed-ncbi-nlm-nih-gov.proxy3.library.mcgill.ca/12592059/
Ubaldi FM, Cimadomo D, Vaiarelli A, Fabozzi G, Venturella R, Maggiulli R, et al. Advanced Maternal Age in IVF: Still a Challenge? The Present and the Future of Its Treatment. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2024 Feb 11];10. Available from: https://pubmed-ncbi-nlm-nih-gov.proxy3.library.mcgill.ca/30842755/
Oxytocin and prolactin responses in long-term breast-feeding - PubMed [Internet]. [cited 2024 Feb 12]. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/6684741/
Bouchard TP, Schweinsberg K, Smith A, Schneider M. Using Quantitative Hormone Monitoring to Identify the Postpartum Return of Fertility. Medicina (Kaunas) [Internet]. 2023 [cited 2024 Jun 25];59. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38004057/
Morris CJ, Aeschbach D, Scheer FAJL. Circadian system, sleep and endocrinology. Mol Cell Endocrinol [Internet]. 2012 [cited 2024 Mar 27];349:91–104. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21939733/
Gardner DK, Lane M, Stevens J, Schlenker T, Schoolcraft WB. Blastocyst score affects implantation and pregnancy outcome: Towards a single blastocyst transfer. Fertil Steril [Internet]. 2000 [cited 2024 Jun 11];73:1155–8. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10856474/
Acknowledgements
There are no acknowledgments to report
Funding
This research received no specific grant from public, commercial, or not-for-profit funding agencies.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
AH, UA, and WB designed the study and helped with data acquisition, analysis, and interpretation. AH, NK, VB, TS and ES participated in data acquisition, analysis, interpretation, and article revision for critical intellectual content. All authors contributed intellectually to the writing or revision of the manuscript, approved the final version, and are accountable for all aspects of the work.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval
This study was performed in line with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. The study received approval from the ethics committee of the McGill University Health Center (MUHC) Reproductive Center (MUHC REB 2024–10239).
Informed consent
Informed consent was waived due to the retrospective design of the study.
Competing interest
The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Hochberg, A., Kugelman, N., Amikam, U. et al. The effect of breastfeeding on treatment outcomes in in-vitro fertilization frozen embryo transfer cycles. J Assist Reprod Genet 42, 2747–2754 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-025-03556-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Version of record:
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-025-03556-9
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.