Regarding "The Robotic Trade-Off in Endometriosis Surgery: Robot-Assisted Versus Conventional Laparoscopy-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis"

Canio Martinelli, Martinelli C, Alfredo Ercoli, Ercoli A, Gargiulo A, Antonio Gargiulo, Vidali A, Andrea Vidali
Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology · 2026 · doi:10.1016/j.jmig.2026.10.016 · PMID:42927852 · W7223552496
Other OA: closed public-domain-us
Limited metadata. Only one source feed has indexed this record so far — no abstract, full text, or open-access copy is available through Endo Lab. The publisher's page (linked below) is the canonical location for the actual content. If you have institutional access, use "Find at my library".
View at publisher → View on OpenAlex View on PubMed
⚙ AI-generated summary by qwen3.7-flash, 2026-10-26 ⓘ

This commentary discusses the findings of a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing robotic-assisted versus conventional laparoscopy in endometriosis surgery.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

References (4)

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-10-27T06:12:01.810347+00:00
openalex
last seen: 2026-10-27T06:04:15.969025+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-10-27T06:05:52.584140+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-10-27T06:37:41.825712+00:00
License: public-domain-us · commercial use OK · attribution required
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine