Detailed fluid resuscitation profiles in patients with severe acute pancreatitis
Observational
OA: closed
AI-generated summary
This retrospective study of severe acute pancreatitis patients found that non-survivors received significantly less crystalloid fluid and had higher central venous pressure than survivors, suggesting CVP alone is an unreliable resuscitation indicator.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM: Appropriate and timely initial fluid resuscitation in acute pancreatitis (AP) is critical. The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate fluid therapy on an hour-by-hour basis in relation to standard indices of adequate resuscitation during AP.
METHODS: Emergency room shock charts, fluid balance sheets and intensive care (ICU) charts for all patients with AP admitted to ICU in a large acute hospital were examined. Vital signs, clinical course and fluid administered during the first 72 h after admission were tabulated against urine output, central venous pressure (CVP) and inotrope/vasopressor therapy.
RESULTS: Sixty-three consecutive patients with AP were initially evaluated. Inter-hospital transfers with established organ dysfunction (n= 11) or where records had insufficient detail (n= 22) were excluded. In the remaining 30 patients, in-hospital death occurred in 7. The cumulative volume of crystalloid given was significantly less at 48 h in patients who died in hospital (3331 ± 800 ml vs. survivors, 7287 ± 544 ml; P < 0.001). Non-survivors had a higher CVP, and received more inotropes/vasopressors.
CONCLUSION: In severe AP-associated organ failure, fluid resuscitation profiles differ between survivors and non-survivors. CVP alone as a crude indicator of adequate resuscitation may be unreliable, potentially leading to the use of inotropes/vasopressors in the inadequately filled patient.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
MeSH descriptors
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-11-08T09:52:27.483963+00:00
- pubmed
- last seen: 2026-10-08T21:08:21.741906+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-11-12T06:32:18.685444+00:00