Role of cul-de-sac aspiration cytology in the management and follow-up of patients with ovarian carcinoma. A preliminary report

The Journal of reproductive medicine · 1985 · vol. 30(11) , pp. 867–70 · PMID:4078821
Other public-domain-us
View on PubMed
⚙ AI-generated summary by qwen3.7-flash, 2026-08-31 ⓘ

This pilot study of 44 ovarian carcinoma patients found a 92% correlation between cul-de-sac aspiration cytology and second-look surgery, suggesting the minimally invasive procedure could potentially replace surgical assessment in disease management.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

In a pilot study involving 44 patients on combined chemotherapy for epithelial ovarian carcinoma, cul-de-sac aspiration cytology was compared with second-look surgery in the evaluation of disease status. There was a 92% correlation. Our preliminary conclusion was that an aspirate from the cul-de-sac or peritoneal cavity can be obtained with ease and that if this finding is confirmed in a larger series now in progress, the procedure may in part replace second-look operations in the management of these patients.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Condition tags

endometriosis

MeSH descriptors

Biopsy, Needle Ovarian Neoplasms Adenocarcinoma Adenocarcinoma Adenocarcinoma Biopsy, Needle Biopsy, Needle Combined Modality Therapy Combined Modality Therapy Cystadenocarcinoma Cystadenocarcinoma Cystadenocarcinoma Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Female Female Humans Humans Neoplasm Staging

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-10-25T09:32:14.900964+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-10-08T21:50:57.891045+00:00
License: public-domain-us · commercial use OK · attribution required
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine