Abstract
Cutaneous endometriosis is one of the rare gynecological conditions. Endometriosis is defined
as the presence of endometrial glands and stroma outside the endometrial cavity. It commonly
occurs in pelvic sites, such as the ovaries, cul-de-sac, bowel, or pelvic peritoneum.
Endometriosis at the incisional scar is difficult to diagnose because of nonspecific symptoms.
Usually, patients complain of pain at the site of the incision during menstruation. The main
causes in most of the reported cases are obstetrical and gynecological surgeries. Endometrial
tissues may be directly implanted in the scar during operation and, under hormonal
stimulation, proliferate and form scar endometriosis. Diagnosis is usually made following
histopathology. A wide excision is recommended to prevent recurrence. We report a case of a
33-year-old woman presenting with a brownish mass on the lateral aspect of the Pfannenstiel
incision from a previous cesarean section scar. The symptoms appeared two years after her
operation. The patient had cyclical pain and brownish discharge from the lesion during
menstruation. Excision of the skin lesion with underlying subcutaneous tissue showed
multiple, minute, firm hemorrhagic foci. Histopathology was performed and revealed a benign
endometrial gland and stroma in the tissues, confirming the diagnosis of scar endometriosis.
Cutaneous endometriosis is an uncommon gynecological condition and difficult to diagnose
because of the nonspecific symptoms. Usually, it is confused with other dermatological and
surgical diseases and delays the diagnosis and management. Surgical scar endometriosis
following obstetric and gynecological procedures is more frequent recently due to an increase
in the number of caesarian sections worldwide. Health care providers should suspect cutaneous
endometriosis in any women with pain and a lump in the incisional scar after pelvic surgery.
Categories:
Obstetrics/Gynecology, Pathology, General Surgery
Keywords
scar endometriosis
Introduction
Abdominal wall endometriosis is a rare gynecological condition and highly related to a previous
history of abdominal surgery. Abdominal wall endometriosis is rare, but it is the most common
site for extrapelvic endometriosis. Surgical scar endometriosis following an obstetric and
gynecological procedure is more frequent recently due to an increase in the number of
caesarian sections worldwide.
Case Presentation
A 33-year-old woman presented with a complaint of cyclic pain, a mass, and brownish
discharge during menstruation from the lateral aspect of the Pfannenstiel incision of a previous
1
2
1
Open Access Case
Report
DOI:
10.7759/cureus.2063
How to cite this article
Alnafisah F, Dawa S K, Alalfy S Abdelaty (January 13, 2018) Skin Endometriosis at the Caesarean Section
Scar: A Case Report and Review of the Literature. Cureus 10(1): e2063.
DOI 10.7759/cureus.2063
cesarean section scar. A review of her past medical and surgical history revealed that she had
undergone three lower segment cesarean sections and one laparoscopic surgery for a painful
right ovarian cyst during her first pregnancy. The mass started to appear two years after her last
caesarian section. The patient had cyclical pain and brownish discharge from the lesion during
menstruation.
A physical examination revealed a palpable, tender, subcutaneous mass, measuring 2x3 cm,
located on the lateral aspect of the Pfannenstiel incision, with multiple tiny orifices protruding
on the skin (Figure
1
).
FIGURE
1: Endometrioma measuring 2 cm x 3 cm located on
the lateral aspect of the Pfannenstiel incision with tiny multiple
orifices protruding on the skin
Sonography and Doppler examinations of the abdominal wall soft tissue revealed a
heterogeneous hypoechoic mass with little vasculature (Figure
2
).
2018 Alnafisah et al. Cureus 10(1): e2063. DOI 10.7759/cureus.2063
2
of
7
FIGURE
2: Abdominal wall soft tissue revealed a
heterogeneous hypoechoic mass with few vasculatures
A wide local excision of the skin lesion with the underlying subcutaneous tissue, measuring
4.1x5.2 cm, found multiple, minute, firm hemorrhagic foci. Histopathology was performed and
revealed a benign endometrial gland and stroma in the tissues, confirming the diagnosis of
endometriosis (Figure
3
).
2018 Alnafisah et al. Cureus 10(1): e2063. DOI 10.7759/cureus.2063
3
of
7
FIGURE
3: Microscopic picture of the lesion showed
endometrial glands and stroma in the subcutaneous tissues of
the skin
The postoperative period was uneventful, and periodic follow-up for 11 months yielded no
recurrence.
Discussion
Endometriosis is a chronic inflammatory reaction characterized by the presence of
endometriomas outside the uterine cavity. It mainly causes painful symptoms and infertility
while some women don’t experience symptoms at all. The prevalence in the general female
population is 2% to 10% but reaches up to 50% in infertile women
[1]
. The main etiology of
endometriosis is not clear, but many studies suggest the hematogenous or lymphatic spread of
stem cells from bone marrow or coelomic metaplasia
[2]
.
2018 Alnafisah et al. Cureus 10(1): e2063. DOI 10.7759/cureus.2063
4
of
7
It commonly occurs in pelvic sites, such as the ovaries, cul-de-sac, bowel, or pelvic peritoneum.
Extrapelvic endometriosis can also occur but less commonly, including sites such as the
abdominal wall, lung, pleura, bladder, omentum, or bowel. It is estrogen-dependent and
commonly affects women during their reproductive age.
Abdominal wall endometriosis is one of the major extrapelvic sites and usually is highly related
to abdominal surgeries and obstetric and gynecological procedures
[3]
like a cesarean section,
hysterectomy, amniocentesis, tubal ligation, appendectomies, umbilical hernioplasties, and
laparoscopic trocar tracts
[4]
. Primary cutaneous endometriosis in the umbilicus was reported
in a patient without any history of abdominal surgery
[5]
.
Cutaneous endometriosis is known as the presence of endometrial tissues that were implanted
in the skin. This is estimated to occur at approximately less than 1% of ectopic sites. It is
classified as primary cutaneous endometriosis that occurs spontaneously without any previous
operation and secondary cutaneous endometriosis. It most commonly occurs after abdominal
surgery
[5]
.
Most of the cases are referred to general surgeons for evaluation because they are commonly
misdiagnosed as granuloma, hematoma, incisional hernia, keloid, or malignancy
[4-5]
. Surgical
scar endometriosis following cesarean section is more frequent recently mainly due to an
increase in the number of cesarean sections.
The Pfannenstiel incision of a cesarean section scar is the most common site of abdominal wall
endometriosis with an incidence of approximately 0.03% to 0.4%. Some published cases suggest
a high incidence after a hysterectomy due to high cellular replication from early decidua
that has pluripotential effects
[6]
.
The pathogenesis of scar endometriosis is very complicated, and the main causes in most of the
reported cases are obstetric and gynecological surgeries. Endometrial tissue may be directly
implanted in the scar during operation and, under hormonal stimulation, proliferate and form
scar endometriosis
[7]
. During surgery, the uterus is opened, and cells easily move into the
pelvic cavity through amniotic fluid and are transported into ectopic sites, such as the skin,
subcutaneous tissues, or muscles of the abdomen and pelvis, near the scar
[8]
. Implanted
endometrial cells at the new site are capable of proliferating due to a bloody environment and
hormonal effects allowing them to grow and form a mass that leads to clinical symptoms.
Clinically the main complaint is a cyclic or non-cyclic pain, abdominal swelling around the
wound, or brownish or blood-like discharge during menstruation, as in our case. In a case-
control study comparing abdominal wall endometriosis to a control group, there was a
significant increase in parity and body mass index with cyclic localized abdominal pain and
absent dysmenorrhea in patients with a history of surgery
[9]
.
Scar endometriosis has also been described as a painful swelling of the scar that is worse during
menses. The cyclical hemorrhage that results from hormonal stimulation during the menstrual
cycle is a diagnostic criterion of scar endometriosis
[4]
. Spontaneous endometriosis or primary
cutaneous endometriosis can also lead to a brownish-colored painful mass with spontaneous
bleeding during menstruation
[5]
.
Khan et al. performed a study at the Mayo Clinic, including 2539 women with endometriosis. Of
these, 34 women (1.34%) had abdominal wall endometriosis with 41% of the cases diagnosed
clinically
[9]
. Among these cases, 59% had endometriosis at the cesarean section scar.
Diagnosis can be reached after a careful history and physical examination. Ultrasonography
2018 Alnafisah et al. Cureus 10(1): e2063. DOI 10.7759/cureus.2063
5
of
7
(US), computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and Doppler sonography
can be used for preoperative diagnosis. The ultrasound is the first choice to evaluate abdominal
and pelvic lesions. Scar endometriosis is usually described as a solid, heterogeneous
hypoechoic mass, as found in our case
[4]
. CT and MRI can help to diagnose and exclude other
lesions in the abdominal wall like a hernia, lipoma, granuloma, or tumor. Fine needle aspiration
cytology (FNAC) can also be used as a preoperative diagnosis and for excluding malignancy
[4]
.
The most accurate diagnosis is a postoperative histopathology of the specimen, showing stroma
and glands in the resected tissues.
Cutaneous endometriosis is mainly treated by a wide local excision with clear margins to
prevent recurrence. Medical management with hormones can relieve the clinical symptoms.
The recurrence rate after surgery is generally low. In many reported studies, there was no
recurrence
[10]
.
Surgery with a wide local excision is the main method of preventing recurrence. A peritoneal
wash with saline and isolation of the surgical scar may have some role in the prevention of scar
endometriosis. During the closure of the superficial layer of the abdomen, change needles and
replace instruments to prevent iatrogenic cellular transport to the scar
[10]
.
Conclusions
Cutaneous endometriosis is a rare condition and difficult to diagnose because of its nonspecific
symptoms. Usually, it is confused with other dermatological and surgical diseases, delaying
diagnosis and management. A few cases have been reported and these are single case reports or
case series. There is no clear guideline for the diagnosis and management of such cases. Health
care providers should suspect cutaneous endometriosis in any woman with pain and a lump in
the incisional scar after pelvic surgery. Complete excision of the lesion is recommended.
Histopathology is important to confirm the diagnosis and to exclude malignancy.
Additional Information
Disclosures
Human subjects:
Consent was obtained by all participants in this study.
Conflicts of interest:
In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following:
Payment/services info:
All authors have declared that no financial support was received from
any organization for the submitted work.
Financial relationships:
All authors have declared
that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any
organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work.
Other relationships:
All
authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to
have influenced the submitted work.
References
1
.
Dunselman GAJ, Vermeulen N, Becker C, et al.:
ESHRE guideline: management of women
with endometriosis
. Hum Reprod. 2014, 29:400–412.
10.1093/humrep/det457
2
.
Practice bulletin no. 114: management of endometriosis
. Obstet Gynecol. 2010, 116:223–236.
10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181e8b073
3
.
Bektas H, Bilsel Y, Sari YS, et al.:
Abdominal wall endometrioma; a 10-year experience and
brief review of the literature
. J Surg Res. 2010, 164:77–81.
10.1016/j.jss.2010.07.043
4
.
Gidwaney R, Badler RL, Yam BL, Hines JJ, Alexeeva V, Donovan V, Katz DS:
Endometriosis of
abdominal and pelvic wall scars: multimodality imaging findings, pathologic correlation, and
radiologic mimics
. Radiographics. 2012, 32:2031–2043.
10.1148/rg.327125024
5
.
Loh SH, Lew BL, Sim WY:
Primary cutaneous endometriosis of umbilicus
. Ann Dermatol.
2017, 29:621–625.
10.5021/ad.2017.29.5.621
2018 Alnafisah et al. Cureus 10(1): e2063. DOI 10.7759/cureus.2063
6
of
7
6
.
Khachani I, Filali Adib A, Bezad R:
Caesarean scar endometriosis: an uncommon surgical
complication on the rise? Case report and literature review
. Case Rep Obstet Gynecol. 2017,
2017:8062924.
10.1155/2017/8062924
7
.
Sasson IE, Taylor HS:
Stem cells and the pathogenesis of endometriosis
. Ann N Y Acad Sci.
2008, 1127:106–115.
10.1196/annals.1434.014
8
.
Wang PH, Juang CM, Chao HT, Yu KJ, Yuan CC, Ng HT:
Wound endometriosis: risk factor
evaluation and treatment
. J Chinese Med Assoc. 2003, 66:113–119.
9
.
Khan Z, Zanfagnin V, El-Nashar SA, Famuyide AO, Daftary GS, Hopkins MR:
Risk factors,
clinical presentation, and outcomes for abdominal wall endometriosis
. J Minim Invasive
Gynecol. 2017, 24:478–484.
10.1016/j.jmig.2017.01.005
10
.
Sumathy S, Mangalakanthi J, Purushothaman K, Sharma D, Remadevi C, Sreedhar S:
Symptomatology and surgical perspective of scar endometriosis: a case series of 16 women
. J
Obstet Gynaecol India. 2017, 67:218–223.
10.1007/s13224-016-0945-4
2018 Alnafisah et al. Cureus 10(1): e2063. DOI 10.7759/cureus.2063
7
of
7
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.