Skin Endometriosis at the Caesarean Section Scar: A Case Report and Review of the Literature

Cureus · 2018 · vol. 10(1) , pp. e2063 · doi:10.7759/cureus.2063 · PMID:29545986 · W2783691093
article OA: diamond CC0 ⤵ 31 in-corpus citations
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-08

This case report and literature review describes a 33-year-old woman diagnosed with scar endometriosis at a C-section incision, presenting with cyclical pain and discharge confirmed by histopathology.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-08 · read from full text

This paper reports a case of a 33-year-old woman with a brownish painful mass, cyclical pain, and brownish discharge arising two years after prior cesarean sections at a Pfannenstiel incision scar. The authors used ultrasound/Doppler to characterize a heterogeneous hypoechoic abdominal wall mass with limited vascularity, then performed wide excision with subcutaneous tissue; histopathology confirmed benign endometrial glands and stroma, establishing the diagnosis of scar (cutaneous) endometriosis. The main limitation is that it is a single case report (plus literature review) without comparative outcomes, and the authors note that diagnosis is often delayed due to nonspecific symptoms and lack of clear guidelines. This paper is centrally about endometriosis—specifically cutaneous/surgical scar endometriosis at a cesarean section scar.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Cutaneous endometriosis is one of the rare gynecological conditions. Endometriosis is defined as the presence of endometrial glands and stroma outside the endometrial cavity. It commonly occurs in pelvic sites, such as the ovaries, cul-de-sac, bowel, or pelvic peritoneum. Endometriosis at the incisional scar is difficult to diagnose because of nonspecific symptoms. Usually, patients complain of pain at the site of the incision during menstruation. The main causes in most of the reported cases are obstetrical and gynecological surgeries. Endometrial tissues may be directly implanted in the scar during operation and, under hormonal stimulation, proliferate and form scar endometriosis. Diagnosis is usually made following histopathology. A wide excision is recommended to prevent recurrence. We report a case of a 33-year-old woman presenting with a brownish mass on the lateral aspect of the Pfannenstiel incision from a previous cesarean section scar. The symptoms appeared two years after her operation. The patient had cyclical pain and brownish discharge from the lesion during menstruation. Excision of the skin lesion with underlying subcutaneous tissue showed multiple, minute, firm hemorrhagic foci. Histopathology was performed and revealed a benign endometrial gland and stroma in the tissues, confirming the diagnosis of scar endometriosis. Cutaneous endometriosis is an uncommon gynecological condition and difficult to diagnose because of the nonspecific symptoms. Usually, it is confused with other dermatological and surgical diseases and delays the diagnosis and management. Surgical scar endometriosis following obstetric and gynecological procedures is more frequent recently due to an increase in the number of caesarian sections worldwide. Health care providers should suspect cutaneous endometriosis in any women with pain and a lump in the incisional scar after pelvic surgery.
Full text 14,569 characters · extracted from oa-pdf · 6 sections · click to expand

Abstract

Cutaneous endometriosis is one of the rare gynecological conditions. Endometriosis is defined as the presence of endometrial glands and stroma outside the endometrial cavity. It commonly occurs in pelvic sites, such as the ovaries, cul-de-sac, bowel, or pelvic peritoneum. Endometriosis at the incisional scar is difficult to diagnose because of nonspecific symptoms. Usually, patients complain of pain at the site of the incision during menstruation. The main causes in most of the reported cases are obstetrical and gynecological surgeries. Endometrial tissues may be directly implanted in the scar during operation and, under hormonal stimulation, proliferate and form scar endometriosis. Diagnosis is usually made following histopathology. A wide excision is recommended to prevent recurrence. We report a case of a 33-year-old woman presenting with a brownish mass on the lateral aspect of the Pfannenstiel incision from a previous cesarean section scar. The symptoms appeared two years after her operation. The patient had cyclical pain and brownish discharge from the lesion during menstruation. Excision of the skin lesion with underlying subcutaneous tissue showed multiple, minute, firm hemorrhagic foci. Histopathology was performed and revealed a benign endometrial gland and stroma in the tissues, confirming the diagnosis of scar endometriosis. Cutaneous endometriosis is an uncommon gynecological condition and difficult to diagnose because of the nonspecific symptoms. Usually, it is confused with other dermatological and surgical diseases and delays the diagnosis and management. Surgical scar endometriosis following obstetric and gynecological procedures is more frequent recently due to an increase in the number of caesarian sections worldwide. Health care providers should suspect cutaneous endometriosis in any women with pain and a lump in the incisional scar after pelvic surgery. Categories: Obstetrics/Gynecology, Pathology, General Surgery

Keywords

scar endometriosis

Introduction

Abdominal wall endometriosis is a rare gynecological condition and highly related to a previous history of abdominal surgery. Abdominal wall endometriosis is rare, but it is the most common site for extrapelvic endometriosis. Surgical scar endometriosis following an obstetric and gynecological procedure is more frequent recently due to an increase in the number of caesarian sections worldwide. Case Presentation A 33-year-old woman presented with a complaint of cyclic pain, a mass, and brownish discharge during menstruation from the lateral aspect of the Pfannenstiel incision of a previous 1 2 1 Open Access Case Report DOI: 10.7759/cureus.2063 How to cite this article Alnafisah F, Dawa S K, Alalfy S Abdelaty (January 13, 2018) Skin Endometriosis at the Caesarean Section Scar: A Case Report and Review of the Literature. Cureus 10(1): e2063. DOI 10.7759/cureus.2063 cesarean section scar. A review of her past medical and surgical history revealed that she had undergone three lower segment cesarean sections and one laparoscopic surgery for a painful right ovarian cyst during her first pregnancy. The mass started to appear two years after her last caesarian section. The patient had cyclical pain and brownish discharge from the lesion during menstruation. A physical examination revealed a palpable, tender, subcutaneous mass, measuring 2x3 cm, located on the lateral aspect of the Pfannenstiel incision, with multiple tiny orifices protruding on the skin (Figure 1 ). FIGURE 1: Endometrioma measuring 2 cm x 3 cm located on the lateral aspect of the Pfannenstiel incision with tiny multiple orifices protruding on the skin Sonography and Doppler examinations of the abdominal wall soft tissue revealed a heterogeneous hypoechoic mass with little vasculature (Figure 2 ). 2018 Alnafisah et al. Cureus 10(1): e2063. DOI 10.7759/cureus.2063 2 of 7 FIGURE 2: Abdominal wall soft tissue revealed a heterogeneous hypoechoic mass with few vasculatures A wide local excision of the skin lesion with the underlying subcutaneous tissue, measuring 4.1x5.2 cm, found multiple, minute, firm hemorrhagic foci. Histopathology was performed and revealed a benign endometrial gland and stroma in the tissues, confirming the diagnosis of endometriosis (Figure 3 ). 2018 Alnafisah et al. Cureus 10(1): e2063. DOI 10.7759/cureus.2063 3 of 7 FIGURE 3: Microscopic picture of the lesion showed endometrial glands and stroma in the subcutaneous tissues of the skin The postoperative period was uneventful, and periodic follow-up for 11 months yielded no recurrence.

Discussion

Endometriosis is a chronic inflammatory reaction characterized by the presence of endometriomas outside the uterine cavity. It mainly causes painful symptoms and infertility while some women don’t experience symptoms at all. The prevalence in the general female population is 2% to 10% but reaches up to 50% in infertile women [1] . The main etiology of endometriosis is not clear, but many studies suggest the hematogenous or lymphatic spread of stem cells from bone marrow or coelomic metaplasia [2] . 2018 Alnafisah et al. Cureus 10(1): e2063. DOI 10.7759/cureus.2063 4 of 7 It commonly occurs in pelvic sites, such as the ovaries, cul-de-sac, bowel, or pelvic peritoneum. Extrapelvic endometriosis can also occur but less commonly, including sites such as the abdominal wall, lung, pleura, bladder, omentum, or bowel. It is estrogen-dependent and commonly affects women during their reproductive age. Abdominal wall endometriosis is one of the major extrapelvic sites and usually is highly related to abdominal surgeries and obstetric and gynecological procedures [3] like a cesarean section, hysterectomy, amniocentesis, tubal ligation, appendectomies, umbilical hernioplasties, and laparoscopic trocar tracts [4] . Primary cutaneous endometriosis in the umbilicus was reported in a patient without any history of abdominal surgery [5] . Cutaneous endometriosis is known as the presence of endometrial tissues that were implanted in the skin. This is estimated to occur at approximately less than 1% of ectopic sites. It is classified as primary cutaneous endometriosis that occurs spontaneously without any previous operation and secondary cutaneous endometriosis. It most commonly occurs after abdominal surgery [5] . Most of the cases are referred to general surgeons for evaluation because they are commonly misdiagnosed as granuloma, hematoma, incisional hernia, keloid, or malignancy [4-5] . Surgical scar endometriosis following cesarean section is more frequent recently mainly due to an increase in the number of cesarean sections. The Pfannenstiel incision of a cesarean section scar is the most common site of abdominal wall endometriosis with an incidence of approximately 0.03% to 0.4%. Some published cases suggest a high incidence after a hysterectomy due to high cellular replication from early decidua that has pluripotential effects [6] . The pathogenesis of scar endometriosis is very complicated, and the main causes in most of the reported cases are obstetric and gynecological surgeries. Endometrial tissue may be directly implanted in the scar during operation and, under hormonal stimulation, proliferate and form scar endometriosis [7] . During surgery, the uterus is opened, and cells easily move into the pelvic cavity through amniotic fluid and are transported into ectopic sites, such as the skin, subcutaneous tissues, or muscles of the abdomen and pelvis, near the scar [8] . Implanted endometrial cells at the new site are capable of proliferating due to a bloody environment and hormonal effects allowing them to grow and form a mass that leads to clinical symptoms. Clinically the main complaint is a cyclic or non-cyclic pain, abdominal swelling around the wound, or brownish or blood-like discharge during menstruation, as in our case. In a case- control study comparing abdominal wall endometriosis to a control group, there was a significant increase in parity and body mass index with cyclic localized abdominal pain and absent dysmenorrhea in patients with a history of surgery [9] . Scar endometriosis has also been described as a painful swelling of the scar that is worse during menses. The cyclical hemorrhage that results from hormonal stimulation during the menstrual cycle is a diagnostic criterion of scar endometriosis [4] . Spontaneous endometriosis or primary cutaneous endometriosis can also lead to a brownish-colored painful mass with spontaneous bleeding during menstruation [5] . Khan et al. performed a study at the Mayo Clinic, including 2539 women with endometriosis. Of these, 34 women (1.34%) had abdominal wall endometriosis with 41% of the cases diagnosed clinically [9] . Among these cases, 59% had endometriosis at the cesarean section scar. Diagnosis can be reached after a careful history and physical examination. Ultrasonography 2018 Alnafisah et al. Cureus 10(1): e2063. DOI 10.7759/cureus.2063 5 of 7 (US), computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and Doppler sonography can be used for preoperative diagnosis. The ultrasound is the first choice to evaluate abdominal and pelvic lesions. Scar endometriosis is usually described as a solid, heterogeneous hypoechoic mass, as found in our case [4] . CT and MRI can help to diagnose and exclude other lesions in the abdominal wall like a hernia, lipoma, granuloma, or tumor. Fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) can also be used as a preoperative diagnosis and for excluding malignancy [4] . The most accurate diagnosis is a postoperative histopathology of the specimen, showing stroma and glands in the resected tissues. Cutaneous endometriosis is mainly treated by a wide local excision with clear margins to prevent recurrence. Medical management with hormones can relieve the clinical symptoms. The recurrence rate after surgery is generally low. In many reported studies, there was no recurrence [10] . Surgery with a wide local excision is the main method of preventing recurrence. A peritoneal wash with saline and isolation of the surgical scar may have some role in the prevention of scar endometriosis. During the closure of the superficial layer of the abdomen, change needles and replace instruments to prevent iatrogenic cellular transport to the scar [10] .

Conclusions

Cutaneous endometriosis is a rare condition and difficult to diagnose because of its nonspecific symptoms. Usually, it is confused with other dermatological and surgical diseases, delaying diagnosis and management. A few cases have been reported and these are single case reports or case series. There is no clear guideline for the diagnosis and management of such cases. Health care providers should suspect cutaneous endometriosis in any woman with pain and a lump in the incisional scar after pelvic surgery. Complete excision of the lesion is recommended. Histopathology is important to confirm the diagnosis and to exclude malignancy. Additional Information Disclosures Human subjects: Consent was obtained by all participants in this study. Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following: Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work. Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work. Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.

References

1 . Dunselman GAJ, Vermeulen N, Becker C, et al.: ESHRE guideline: management of women with endometriosis . Hum Reprod. 2014, 29:400–412. 10.1093/humrep/det457 2 . Practice bulletin no. 114: management of endometriosis . Obstet Gynecol. 2010, 116:223–236. 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181e8b073 3 . Bektas H, Bilsel Y, Sari YS, et al.: Abdominal wall endometrioma; a 10-year experience and brief review of the literature . J Surg Res. 2010, 164:77–81. 10.1016/j.jss.2010.07.043 4 . Gidwaney R, Badler RL, Yam BL, Hines JJ, Alexeeva V, Donovan V, Katz DS: Endometriosis of abdominal and pelvic wall scars: multimodality imaging findings, pathologic correlation, and radiologic mimics . Radiographics. 2012, 32:2031–2043. 10.1148/rg.327125024 5 . Loh SH, Lew BL, Sim WY: Primary cutaneous endometriosis of umbilicus . Ann Dermatol. 2017, 29:621–625. 10.5021/ad.2017.29.5.621 2018 Alnafisah et al. Cureus 10(1): e2063. DOI 10.7759/cureus.2063 6 of 7 6 . Khachani I, Filali Adib A, Bezad R: Caesarean scar endometriosis: an uncommon surgical complication on the rise? Case report and literature review . Case Rep Obstet Gynecol. 2017, 2017:8062924. 10.1155/2017/8062924 7 . Sasson IE, Taylor HS: Stem cells and the pathogenesis of endometriosis . Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2008, 1127:106–115. 10.1196/annals.1434.014 8 . Wang PH, Juang CM, Chao HT, Yu KJ, Yuan CC, Ng HT: Wound endometriosis: risk factor evaluation and treatment . J Chinese Med Assoc. 2003, 66:113–119. 9 . Khan Z, Zanfagnin V, El-Nashar SA, Famuyide AO, Daftary GS, Hopkins MR: Risk factors, clinical presentation, and outcomes for abdominal wall endometriosis . J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2017, 24:478–484. 10.1016/j.jmig.2017.01.005 10 . Sumathy S, Mangalakanthi J, Purushothaman K, Sharma D, Remadevi C, Sreedhar S: Symptomatology and surgical perspective of scar endometriosis: a case series of 16 women . J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2017, 67:218–223. 10.1007/s13224-016-0945-4 2018 Alnafisah et al. Cureus 10(1): e2063. DOI 10.7759/cureus.2063 7 of 7

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-pdf

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Condition tags

endometriosis

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (11)

Cited by (31)

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-06-04T01:30:01.192114+00:00
openalex
last seen: 2026-06-04T00:00:01.174412+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-05-13T22:19:55.107525+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK