A randomized, double-blind, multicenter study comparing a starting dose of 100 IU or 200 IU of recombinant follicle stimulating hormone (Puregon) in women undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation for IVF treatment

RCT OA: closed
📄 Open PDF View on PubMed View at publisher
⚙ AI-generated summary by qwen3.7-flash, 2026-08-22 ⓘ

In a randomized trial of 192 women undergoing IVF, initiating recombinant FSH stimulation with either 100 IU or 200 IU yielded comparable pregnancy rates, embryo quality, and safety profiles.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the efficiency and efficacy of two starting doses of recombinant FSH (follitropin-beta, Puregon) in women undergoing IVF treatment. METHODS: This prospective, randomized, double-blind, multicentric (N = 6) study included 192 women undergoing IVF using the long protocol of GnRH agonist who received either 100 IU or 200 IU of r-FSH per day. Gonadotropin dose adjustment was allowed after day 4 of stimulation. RESULTS: The average (SD) number of oocytes retrieved was 10.9 (5.4) and 12.2 (5.6) in the 100 IU and 200 IU group respectively (p = 0.067). The total doses of Puregon administered were 1887 IU and 2559 IU in the 100 IU and 200 IU group respectively. The number of transferable embryos, and the rates of pregnancies, cancelled cycles, miscarriages and adverse events including OHSS were comparable between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Women undergoing IVF have similar outcomes whether recombinant FSH is commenced in a dose of 100 IU or 200 IU for the first 4 days of stimulation.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

MeSH descriptors

Fertilization in Vitro Follicle Stimulating Hormone, Human Ovulation Induction Adult Dose-Response Relationship, Drug Double-Blind Method Female Follicle Stimulating Hormone, Human Humans Oocytes Ovulation Induction Prospective Studies Treatment Outcome

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

SciLite annotations

chemicals 1
amyloid-beta

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-10-11T09:27:45.537177+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-10-08T21:03:04.870308+00:00
scilite
last seen: 2026-05-18T04:25:29.313245+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-10-17T06:24:38.187582+00:00