Diagnostic Laparoscopy in the Future: Negative Aspects

Vineet Mishra, Smit B Solanki
In: Journal of South Asian Federation of Obstetrics and Gynaecology · 2023 · vol. 15(4) , pp. 486–489 · doi:10.5005/jp-journals-10006-2273 · W4386804048
article OA: bronze CC0
🔓 Open OA copy View on OpenAlex View at publisher
⚙ AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-07 ⓘ

This review evaluates diagnostic laparoscopy for endometriosis, considering its cost-effectiveness, patient burden, diagnostic delays, and variable outcomes, while exploring future alternatives.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Endometriosis affects a woman's quality of life significantly in around 80% of cases of sterility and severe pelvic pain.Adolescent patients experience disproportionately long delays in receiving a diagnosis for this illness, which is very frequently diagnosed an average of 6 years later.Invasive procedures are used as the primary diagnostic, and access to specialist treatment is restricted, which contributes to this in some measure.While essential for the diagnosis and management of endometriosis, laparoscopy has been shown to be less cost-effective than empiric traditional therapy and to place more emphasis on the patient and the overall clinical course.We learn more about the complexity of this condition as new research becomes available.The effectiveness of laparoscopy has been proven to vary, with high rates of recurrence and varied symptom relief over time.Laparoscopy is more advantageous for advanced disease and deep infiltrating endometriosis.Studies have also shown a slight correlation between the amount of discomfort felt by patients and the stage and location of lesions.This article examines future prospects and alternatives while also evaluating present endometriosis care guidelines and the appropriateness of diagnostic laparoscopy.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Condition tags

endometriosisdie_deep_infiltrating

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (8)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-04T00:00:01.174412+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK