A randomized trial comparing changes in psychological well-being and sexuality after laparoscopic and abdominal hysterectomy

Marie Ellström, Monica Åström, Anders Möller, Jan‐Henrik Olsson, Mats Hahlin
In: Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica · 2003 · vol. 82(9) , pp. 871–875 · doi:10.1080/j.1600-0412.2003.00216.x · PMID:12911451 · W2008248705
article OA: closed CC0 ⤵ 13 in-corpus citations
View on OpenAlex View on PubMed View at publisher
⚙ AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-07 ⓘ

This randomized trial found no significant differences in psychological well-being or sexuality between women who underwent laparoscopic hysterectomy and those who underwent abdominal hysterectomy one year post-surgery.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To evaluate changes in psychological well-being and sexuality 1 year after laparoscopic and abdominal hysterectomy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Seventy-four women scheduled for abdominal hysterectomy due to benign disorders and assessed as not suitable for vaginal hysterectomy were randomized to abdominal hysterectomy (n = 38) or laparoscopic hysterectomy (n = 36). The Psychological General Well-Being (PGWB) Index was used to evaluate changes in psychological well-being and the McCoy scale was used to evaluate changes in sexuality. The differences in outcome before and 1 year after the hysterectomy were calculated for each individual and the changes were compared within and between the two patient groups. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the two patient groups with respect to changes in psychological well-being and sexuality 1 year after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: This study implies that psychological well-being and sexuality after hysterectomy are not influenced by surgical technique.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (29)

Cited by (13)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-05-11T06:08:11.709964+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK