A uterine cervix supporting device (Con-CapTM) for reducing canal stenosis after Loop Electrosurgical Excisional Procedure
Non-randomised trial
OA: closed
CC0
AI-generated summary
A uterine cervix supporting device (Con-CapTM) successfully maintained the diameter of the cervical canal and reduced stenosis following Loop Electrosurgical Excisional Procedure in 78 women.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
BACGROUND: Cervical stenoses are one of the main long-term consequences after conization of the uterine cervix.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a uterine cervix supporting device (Con-CapTM) in reducing uterine cervical stenosis after Loop Electrosurgical Excisional Procedure (LEEP).
METHODS: We enrolled 112 patients who underwent LEEP between March 2017 to May 2019. Con-CapTM was inserted into the uterine endocervical canal for 4 weeks after LEEP. Laboratory values and clinical symptoms were evaluated. The presence of uterine cervical narrowing was determined at 2 weeks after removal of the Con-CapTM. Data were analyzed using the two-sample t test and χ2 test.
RESULTS: A total of 78 women completed the 6-week study period. Thirty-four patients did not complete the study period. The diameter of the uterine cervical canal was significantly greater at postoperative 6 weeks than preoperatively (Hegar dilator No, 2.10 ± 0.56 vs. 3.21 ± 0.71, P< 0.01). The complications were acceptable.
CONCLUSIONS: Con-CapTM can be used to reduce uterine cervical stenosis safely and effectively after conization of uterine cervix.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
MeSH descriptors
Citation neighborhood (sparse)
Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.
Cites (1)
References (21)
- Complete cervical stenosis after conization: Timing for the minimally invasive reconstructive surgery via openalex
- doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.1990.tb01811.x via openalex
- doi:10.1590/s1516-31802008000400002 via openalex
- doi:10.1034/j.1600-0412.1999.781012.x via openalex
- doi:10.3109/00016348209156537 via openalex
- doi:10.1186/s13256-016-0831-9 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0301-2115(02)00062-3 via openalex
- W64150443 via openalex
- doi:10.1007/s00404-011-2148-7 via openalex
- doi:10.1006/gyno.1999.5626 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.10.008 via openalex
- W2435415209 via openalex
- W2976977881 via openalex
- W6602581873 via openalex
- W6768563731 via openalex
- doi:10.1159/000293343 via openalex
- doi:10.1111/j.1479-828x.2007.00766.x via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0301-2115(02)00245-2 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0029-7844(96)00331-6 via openalex
- doi:10.1097/00006250-200011000-00003 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0029-7844(00)00993-5 via openalex
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-05-11T03:30:45.023671+00:00
- pubmed
- last seen: 2026-10-08T21:30:40.998460+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-11-11T07:04:17.060302+00:00
License: CC0
· commercial use OK