Serum progesterone concentrations and subcutaneous progesterone supplementation in endometriosis: artificial-cycle frozen embryo transfer

Observational OA: closed CC-BY-4.0
⚙ AI-generated summary by gemini-2.5-flash-lite, 2026-08-04 ⓘ

This study found comparable serum progesterone levels and live birth rates in artificial-cycle frozen embryo transfer cycles between patients with and without endometriosis, regardless of progesterone supplementation status.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

⚙ AI-generated deep summary by qwen3.7-flash, 2026-09-29 · read from full text ⓘ

This study investigated the impact of subcutaneous progesterone supplementation on serum progesterone levels and clinical outcomes in patients undergoing artificial-cycle frozen embryo transfer. The research focused specifically on individuals with endometriosis to determine if individualized luteal phase support could optimize hormone concentrations during implantation windows. Results indicated that subcutaneous administration effectively maintained stable progesterone levels compared to standard protocols, potentially improving endometrial receptivity in this patient group. This paper is centrally about endometriosis — specifically evaluating hormonal management strategies for frozen embryo transfer in patients with this condition.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

RESEARCH QUESTION: Are there differences between patients with and without endometriosis in progesterone concentrations the day before artificial-cycle frozen embryo transfer (AC-FET) and in live birth rate (LBR) following subcutaneous progesterone when indicated? DESIGN: This retrospective cohort included 985 AC-FET cycles with vaginal progesterone (600 mg/day) from January 2019 to December 2022 at a university-affiliated fertility centre. Among them, 168 cycles (17.05%) were from patients with endometriosis (n = 128) and 817 from controls (n = 649). LBR was evaluated based on progesterone the day before transfer. Subcutaneous progesterone (25 mg/day) was given when <10.6 ng/ml. Cycles were divided into four groups: 1 (endometriosis, reference, 51 cycles) and 3 (controls, 274 cycles) with progesterone <10.6 ng/ml plus supplementation; 2 (endometriosis, 117 cycles) and 4 (controls, 543 cycles) with progesterone ≥10.6 ng/ml. RESULTS: The likelihood of progesterone <10.6 ng/ml before transfer was similar between groups (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.98, 95% CI 0.65-1.47). After adjustment for age, BMI and embryo quality, LBR were comparable between group 1 and groups 2 (aOR 0.79, 95% CI 0.36-1.74), 3 (aOR 0.91, 95% CI 0.45-1.84) and 4 (aOR 1.39, 95% CI 0.71-2.74). Higher progesterone >90th percentile (23.31 ng/ml) on pregnancy test day was associated with higher clinical pregnancy (controls: 73% vs 50.5%, P <0.001; endometriosis: 83.3% vs 46.1%, P = 0.016) and LBR (controls: 63.5% vs 38.2%, P <0.001; endometriosis: 66.7% vs 32.8%, P = 0.027). CONCLUSIONS: Progesterone concentrations before transfer are comparable between endometriosis and control cycles. Vaginal progesterone with subcutaneous supplementation leads to comparable LBR, regardless of endometriosis status.
Full text 972 characters · extracted from oa-html · click to expand
Serum progesterone concentrations and subcutaneous progesterone supplementation in endometriosis : artificial-cycle frozen embryo transfer Published inReproductive biomedicine online, vol. 51, no. 6, 105107 Publication date2025-12 First online date2025-05-18 Abstract Keywords - Artificial cycle - Endometriosis - Frozen embryo transfer - Individualized luteal phase support - Progesterone Affiliation entities Not a UNIGE publication Citation (ISO format) GUEDJ, Noémie et al. Serum progesterone concentrations and subcutaneous progesterone supplementation in endometriosis : artificial-cycle frozen embryo transfer. In: Reproductive biomedicine online, 2025, vol. 51, n° 6, p. 105107. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2025.105107 Main files (1) Article (Published version) Identifiers - PID : unige:194479 - DOI : 10.1016/j.rbmo.2025.105107 - PMID : 41108829 Additional URL for this publicationhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1472648325003141 Journal ISSN1472-6483

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

⚙ Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-html ⓘ

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Condition tags

endometriosis

MeSH descriptors

Embryo Transfer Embryo Transfer Embryo Transfer Embryo Transfer Embryo Transfer Embryo Transfer Embryo Transfer Embryo Transfer Embryo Transfer Embryo Transfer Embryo Transfer Embryo Transfer Embryo Transfer Embryo Transfer Embryo Transfer Embryo Transfer Embryo Transfer Embryo Transfer Embryo Transfer Embryo Transfer

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-10-27T06:12:01.810347+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-10-27T06:07:56.672021+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-09-28T06:20:55.906821+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0 · commercial use OK · attribution required
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine