[Hysterosalpingography combined with hysteroscopy-laporoscopy in diagnosing female infertility]
Diagnostic accuracy
OA: closed
AI-generated summary
Retrospective analysis of 133 infertile women showed that combining hysterosalpingography with hysteroscopy-laparoscopy achieved diagnostic coincidence rates of 80.2% for uterus-cervix infertility and 89.7% for tubal infertility.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate hysterosalpingography (HSG) combined with hysteroscopy-laparoscopy in diagnosing female infertility.
METHODS: One hundred thirty three female infertile patients by clinical diagnosis were given HSG and hysteroscopy-laparoscopy, and the results were retrospectively analyzed.
RESULTS: The total diagnostic coincidence rate of the two methods in diagnosing uterus-cervix infertility was 80.2%, while the coincidence rate of the two methods in diagnosing tubal infertility was 89.7%.
CONCLUSION: HSG combined with hysteroscopy-laparoscopy is an optimal method in diagnosing female infertility at present.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Condition tags
MeSH descriptors
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-11-01T09:25:17.647243+00:00
- pubmed
- last seen: 2026-10-08T21:02:12.072533+00:00