Letter to Editor Concerning: Menstrual-Associated Gastrointestinal Symptoms and Their Impact on IBS Diagnosis in Adolescents

Other OA: closed
⚙ AI-generated summary by qwen3.7-flash, 2026-10-03 ⓘ

This letter to the editor addresses menstrual-associated gastrointestinal symptoms and their impact on irritable bowel syndrome diagnosis in adolescents.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

⚙ AI-generated deep summary by qwen3.7-flash, 2026-10-03 · read from full text ⓘ

This letter critiques the Rome IV criteria for diagnosing irritable bowel syndrome in adolescents, arguing that the requirement for symptoms to occur during only four days of menstrual bleeding per month leads to misclassification. The author highlights that gonadal hormones significantly influence gastrointestinal function and visceral pain, creating a diagnostic gap where cyclic symptoms may stem from undiagnosed gynecological conditions rather than primary gut disorders. Specific limitations noted include the lack of data on hormonal contraceptive use, which can alter GI symptoms, and the reliance on retrospective self-reporting susceptible to recall bias. Relevance to endometriosis: explicitly cited as a cause of cyclic pelvic pain and secondary dysmenorrhea with diarrhea or constipation that can be misdiagnosed as IBS due to long pre-diagnosis intervals.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Full text 5,066 characters · extracted from oa-html · click to expand
To the Editor, We read the article: “Menstrual‐Associated Gastrointestinal Symptoms and Their Impact on IBS Diagnosis in Adolescents” with great interest [1]. One of the most significant limitations of the Rome IV criteria is that the algorithm considers a cluster of cyclic gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms as “active menstrual bleeding” that lasts for only 4 days/month for 2 months, thereby inadvertently misclassifying these symptoms. This is an important consideration, because changes in gonadal hormones have a profound effect on enteric smooth muscle function, visceral nociception, and the severity of GI symptoms throughout the menses [2]. There are, however, some methodological and clinical factors that need to be taken into consideration. First, a symptom‐based questionnaire does not clarify the cyclical GI discomfort attributable to hidden or undiagnosed gynecological pathologies. The exclusion of patients with known organic disease is a wise decision, but there remains a diagnostic gap in adolescent gynaecologic cases, which have long periods of pre‐diagnosis. Symptoms of early‐stage endometriosis, adenomyosis, and congenital obstructive reproductive tract anomalies include cyclic pelvic pain and secondary dysmenorrhea with diarrhea or constipation, especially during menstruation [3]. The 4–11 year time interval between formal clinical diagnosis and the onset of these structural and inflammatory pathologies would pass the history‐based exclusion. This raises the possibility that adolescents who reported symptoms of the menstrual cycle only might have had an underlying undiagnosed gynecological condition and not a primary disorder of gut–brain interaction. Second, data on the use of hormones in contraceptive products are lacking. Hormonal contraceptives or progestin implants are often used in adolescents as treatments for non‐contraceptive indications such as menorrhagia, hypothalamic–pituitary‐ovarian axis immaturity, and severe primary dysmenorrhea, which suppresses dysmenorrhea and may also alter GI symptoms [4]. Thus, the use of hormonal contraceptives may have confounded the results. Third, the menstrual symptom definition was based on a single retrospective self‐report and was not validated across consecutive cycles [1]. Retrospective reporting is susceptible to recall bias for reporting functional GI symptoms and may result in higher scores than will be seen in prospective monitoring [5]. If the adolescent has an unusually heavy period, they may be misdiagnosed because they might remember meeting the shorter 4‐day criteria for pediatrics in one period. Multi‐cycle, daily symptom diaries for pelvic symptoms, and formal gynecological screening and pelvic imaging should be incorporated in future prospective studies to enhance the reliability of the findings. Author Contributions Maheen Hamid: Conceptualization, manuscript writing, formatting, editing and revision. Funding The author has nothing to report. Disclosure Declaration of Use of AI: No generative AI was used to generate scientific content. Conflicts of Interest The author declares no conflicts of interest. Linked Articles This article is linked to Arrizabalo et al. papers. To view this article, visit https://doi.org/10.1111/nmo.70382. Data Availability Statement Data sharing not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analysed during the current study. References - 1. Arrizabalo S., Banegas K., Velasco‐Benitez C. A., Velasco‐Suarez D. A., Linares M., and Saps M., “Menstrual‐Associated Gastrointestinal Symptoms and Their Impact on IBS Diagnosis in Adolescents,” Neurogastroenterology and Motility 38, no. 6 (2026): e70382, 10.1111/nmo.70382. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] - 2. Houghton L. A., Lea R., Jackson N., and Whorwell P. J., “The Menstrual Cycle Affects Rectal Sensitivity in Patients With Irritable Bowel Syndrome but Not Healthy Volunteers,” Gut 50, no. 4 (2002): 471–474, 10.1136/gut.50.4.471. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] - 3. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) , “Committee Opinion No. 760: Dysmenorrhea and Endometriosis in the Adolescent,” Obstetrics and Gynecology 132, no. 6 (2018): e249–e258, 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002978. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] - 4. King J., “Noncontraceptive Uses of Hormonal Contraception,” Journal of Midwifery & Women's Health 56, no. 6 (2011): 628–635, 10.1111/j.1542-2011.2011.00118.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] - 5. Lackner J. M., Jaccard J., Keefer L., et al., “The Accuracy of Patient‐Reported Measures for GI Symptoms: A Comparison of Real Time and Retrospective Reports,” Neurogastroenterology and Motility 26, no. 12 (2014): 1802–1811, 10.1111/nmo.12466. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] Associated Data This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article. Data Availability Statement Data sharing not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

⚙ Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-html ⓘ

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

SciLite annotations

chemicals 1
progestin

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-11-01T09:25:17.647243+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-10-08T21:56:19.338120+00:00
scilite
last seen: 2026-09-06T10:05:09.034756+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-11-06T06:34:47.334260+00:00