Does vitamin D supplementation modulate metabolic risk factors of cardiovascular disease? A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials

Systematic review / meta-analysis OA: closed
⚙ AI-generated summary by qwen3.7-flash, 2026-09-23 ⓘ

This meta-analysis of 45 randomized controlled trials found that vitamin D supplementation modestly reduced LDL cholesterol, systolic blood pressure, fasting glucose, and HbA1c, with effects modified by age and baseline vitamin D levels.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

⚙ AI-generated deep summary by qwen3.7-flash, 2026-09-23 · read from full text ⓘ

This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the impact of vitamin D supplementation on cardiometabolic risk factors by analyzing data from 45 randomized controlled trials involving over 14,000 participants. The authors found that supplementation significantly reduced low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, systolic blood pressure, fasting blood glucose, and hemoglobin A1c compared to placebo, with effects varying based on age and baseline vitamin D levels. The study notes that while these reductions are statistically significant, their clinical significance remains uncertain and further research is required. The paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Vitamin D has been proposed to influence several cardiometabolic risk factors; however, evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and recent meta-analyses remains inconsistent regarding the magnitude of these effects. This meta-analysis evaluated the effects of vitamin D supplementation on lipid profile, blood pressure, and glycaemic parameters, and explored whether age and baseline serum vitamin D concentrations modified these associations. METHODS AND STUDY DESIGN: A systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs was conducted to compare oral vitamin D supplementation with placebo in adults. PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched systematically. Risk of bias was as-sessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. Pooled effect sizes with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using random-effects models. RESULTS: A total of 14,051 abstracts were identified, and 45 RCTs were included in the final analysis. Vitamin D supplementation significantly reduced low-density lipoprotein cho-lesterol (LDL-C) by 0.136 mmol/L (95% CI: -0.215, -0.056), systolic blood pressure (SBP) by 2.79 mm Hg (95% CI: -4.65, -0.94), fasting blood glucose (FBG) by 0.11 mmol/L (95% CI: -0.19, -0.04), and hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) by 0.164% (95% CI: -0.32, -0.01) compared with placebo. Subgroup analyses showed reductions in SBP and LDL-C among participants aged ≥55 years, whereas FBG was reduced in those aged <55 years. While favorable effects on FBG and HbA1c were observed with a baseline blood level of vitamin D of less than 50 nmol/L. CONCLUSIONS: Vitamin D supplementation may modestly improve selected cardiomet-abolic risk factors. Age and baseline vitamin D status may influence these effects, although their clinical sig-nificance remains uncertain. Further well-designed RCTs are needed.
Full text 1,853 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
- 期刊 Background and Objectives: Vitamin D has been proposed to influence several cardiometabolic risk factors; however, evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and recent meta-analyses remains inconsistent regarding the magnitude of these effects. This meta-analysis evaluated the effects of vitamin D supplementation on lipid profile, blood pressure, and glycaemic parameters, and explored whether age and baseline serum vitamin D concentrations modified these associations. Methods and Study Design: A systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs was conducted to compare oral vitamin D supplementation with placebo in adults. PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched systematically. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. Pooled effect sizes with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using random-effects models. Results: A total of 14,051 abstracts were identified, and 45 RCTs were included in the final analysis. Vitamin D supplementation significantly reduced low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) by 0.136 mmol/L (95% CI: -0.215, -0.056), systolic blood pressure (SBP) by 2.79 mm Hg (95% CI: -4.65, -0.94), fasting blood glucose (FBG) by 0.11 mmol/L (95% CI: -0.19, -0.04), and hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) by 0.164% (95% CI: -0.32, -0.01) compared with placebo. Subgroup analyses showed reductions in SBP and LDL-C among participants aged ≥55 years, whereas FBG was reduced in those aged <55 years. While favorable effects on FBG and HbA1c were observed with a baseline blood level of vitamin D of less than 50 nmol/L. Conclusions: Vitamin D supplementation may modestly improve selected cardiometabolic risk factors. Age and baseline vitamin D status may influence these effects, although their clinical significance remains uncertain. Further well-designed RCTs are needed.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

⚙ Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback ⓘ

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

MeSH descriptors

Cardiovascular Diseases Cardiovascular Diseases Dietary Supplements Vitamin D Vitamin D Vitamin D Vitamin D Blood Glucose Blood Pressure Blood Pressure Cardiometabolic Risk Factors Heart Disease Risk Factors Humans Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic Risk Factors

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

SciLite annotations

chemicals 24
vitamin d vitamin d lipid vitamin d vitamin d vitamin d glucose vitamin d vitamin d lipoprotein cholesterol vitamin d vitamin d angiotensin aldosterone cholesterol lipoprotein triglyceride glucose calcidiol doxercalciferol doxercalciferol lipid d3 vitamins
organisms 1
human

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-11-01T09:25:17.647243+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-10-08T21:56:28.037313+00:00
scilite
last seen: 2026-09-06T10:05:09.034756+00:00