Heavy metals exposure and infertility: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.

Systematic review / meta-analysis OA: gold CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0
📄 Open PDF View on PubMed View at publisher

Abstract

BackgroundInfertility is a major public health concern worldwide, with growing evidence implicating environmental exposures to heavy metals as potential contributors. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the association between heavy metals in biological samples and infertility among men and women.MethodsFollowing PRISMA guidelines, a systematic search on PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science was conducted. Observational studies reporting levels of arsenic, cadmium, chromium, mercury, nickel, and lead in infertile versus fertile individuals were included until December 2025. Data screening, data extraction and quality assessment was performed by two researchers independently. Heterogeneity between studies was assessed using Cochran's Q test and the I² statistic. Meta-analysis was performed using fixed/random-effects model to pool standardized mean differences (SMD) and 95% confidence intervals (CI).ResultsA total of 22 studies were included in the systematic review. In the qualitative synthesis, although the association of infertility with different heavy metals was statistically significant in the most of included studies, the findings were heterogeneous among studies. In the quantitative synthesis, seminal levels of cadmium (pooled SMD = 1.84, 95% CI: 0.15, 3.53), blood lead levels (SMD = 0.69, 95% CI: 0.06, 1.32), and blood mercury concentrations (SMD = 0.16, 95% CI: 0.02, 0.30) was significantly higher in infertile individuals compared with fertile counterparts. Other pooled associations between heavy metals and infertility were not statistically significant (p > 0.05).ConclusionThe study findings support a significant association between heavy metals, particularly cadmium, lead and mercury with infertility. These findings underscore the importance of mitigating environmental and occupational exposure to heavy metals to protect reproductive health.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

SciLite annotations

chemicals 43
metal metal metal arsenic cadmium chromium nickel metal cadmium metal cadmium metal metal cadmium metal water arsenic metal metal metal cadmium arsenic nickel chromium metal arsenic arsenic arsenic arsenic metal metal metal metal metal metal cadmium cadmium cadmium chromium metal metal metal metal
organisms 14
men 2004071 noordeloos 2009062 human men 2004071 noordeloos 2009062 men 2004071 noordeloos 2009062 human human human humans rodents men 2004071 noordeloos 2009062

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-11-01T09:25:17.647243+00:00
scilite
last seen: 2026-11-01T10:01:09.713090+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-11-02T06:26:32.194460+00:00
License: CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0