Outcomes of 1503 cycles of modified natural cycle in vitro fertilization: a single-institution experience
Observational
OA: closed
AI-generated summary
This single-institution analysis of 1503 modified natural cycle IVF cycles found acceptable clinical pregnancy rates, particularly for women aged 35 or younger and those over 36 with normal ovarian response.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
PURPOSE: A retrospective cohort study was conducted in a single academic center to determine if modified natural cycle in vitro fertilization (mnIVF) is an acceptable treatment for the infertile couple.
METHODS: Cycles performed between July 2005 and December 2011 were included. In our center's mnIVF protocol, a GnRH antagonist, gonadotrophin, as well as Indocid are given on a daily basis from detection of a dominant follicle until ovulation induction. The primary outcomes were clinical pregnancy rates (CPR) per cycle started and per embryo transfer (ET). Outcomes were stratified by female patient age (≤35 years and ≥36 years). They were further stratified in each age group by ovarian response status according to the 2011 Bologna criteria.
RESULTS: A total of 1503 cycles of mnIVF, performed in 782 patients, were analyzed. CPRs were 13.7 % per started cycle and 32.5 % per ET. Stratification by ovarian response status (normal or poor) in each age group showed similar CPRs in patients ≤35 years (p = 0.373), and divergent CPRs per ET in patients ≥36 years old (26.26 vs 6.25 %).
CONCLUSION: MnIVF is an acceptable treatment option for patients considering IVF, particularly for women ≤35 years old and for women ≥36 years old with normal ovarian response.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
MeSH descriptors
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-11-08T09:52:27.483963+00:00
- pubmed
- last seen: 2026-10-08T21:15:39.152187+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-11-08T06:46:05.892536+00:00