Primary fallopian tube carcinoma diagnosed preoperatively by cervical smear
A case report describes a 49-year-old woman diagnosed with primary fallopian tube carcinoma via cervical smear despite normal preoperative imaging and endometrial sampling, highlighting the diagnostic utility of cytology.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
This case report describes the preoperative diagnosis of a rare primary fallopian tube carcinoma in a 49-year-old woman who presented with no clinical symptoms or abnormal imaging results. Adenocarcinoma cells were identified in repeated cervical smears despite negative endometrial and endocervical biopsies, prompting a laparotomy that revealed a 7-mm serous papillary adenocarcinoma in the right fallopian tube. The authors highlight that while such tumors are uncommon and typically difficult to diagnose early, cytological screening can occasionally detect malignant cells shed from the tubal tumor before they involve adjacent organs. Relevance to endometriosis: The paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.
Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
Full text
5,069 characters
· extracted from
pmc-nxml
· 2 sections
· click to expand
Case
Discussion
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works
MeSH descriptors
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
References (6)
- W1965400922 via openalex
- W1981462191 via openalex
- W2033649351 via openalex
- W2161375304 via openalex
- W2186386336 via openalex
- W2413499077 via openalex
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-06-04T00:00:01.174412+00:00
- pubmed
- last seen: 2026-10-08T21:15:21.500443+00:00