Keywords
Adenomyosis; adolescence; dysmenorrhea; endometriosis; fertility
1. Introduction
Severe dysmenorrhea, heavy menstrual bleeding,
and chronic pelvic pain during adolescence are often
attributed to functional menstrual symptoms or
primary dysmenorrhea [1, 2]. This interpretation may
delay evaluation for underlying gynecological disease,
particularly when symptoms are persistent, disabling,
or poorly responsive to first -line analgesic treatment
[3-5]. In this context, adenomyosis has received
increasing attention as a possible yet underrecognized
contributor to severe menstrual symptoms in
adolescents and young women [6].
Adenomyosis has traditionally been regarded as
a disorder of later reproductive life, largely because
earlier descriptions were based on hysterectomy
specimens and adult surgical series. However, wider
use of high-resolution pelvic ultrasound and magnetic
resonance imaging has challenged this age -based
concept. Imaging studies now suggest that
adenomyosis-like features may be detected before
adulthood or in early reproductive life, particularly in
patients with severe dysmenorrhea, heavy menstrual
bleeding, pelvic pain, or coexisting endometriosis.
Young age alone should therefore not exclude
adenomyosis from the differential diagnosis.
The clinical significance of adolescent
adenomyosis remains uncertain. Unlike classic adult
phenotype, early -onset adenomyosis may present as
subtle junctional -zone abnormalities, focal inner -
Ivyspring
International Publisher
Int. J. Med. Sci. 2026, Vol. 23
https://www.medsci.org
3454
myometrial lesions, or cystic phenotypes rather than
diffuse uterine enlargement. These findings may be
overlooked when clinicians rely on the traditional
adult template, but they may also be overinterpreted
when isolated imaging signs are considered witho ut
symptom burden or developmental context. This
diagnostic tension is particularly relevant in
adolescents because age -specific imaging thresholds
have not been established.
The evidence base is also heterogeneous. Many
studies include both adolescents and young adult
women, whereas much of the mechanistic and
reproductive literature is derived from adult
populations. It remains unclear whether adenomyosis
recognized during ad olescence represents an early
stage of the adult disease spectrum, a distinct early-
onset phenotype, or a heterogeneous group of
conditions with different trajectories. Natural history,
optimal diagnostic criteria, treatment response, and
long-term reprodu ctive implications remain poorly
defined.
To address this heterogeneity, this review uses
“adolescent adenomyosis” as an operational term for
adenomyosis or adenomyosis -like imaging findings
identified during adolescence, generally
corresponding to patients aged 10 –19 years according
to the WHO de finition of adolescence. Because no
universally accepted age threshold exists for “early -
onset adenomyosis,” we use this broader term to
include adolescent cases and adenomyosis recognized
in young women near the transition from adolescence
to adulthood, particularly when symptoms or imaging
features suggest onset early in reproductive life.
Accordingly, evidence from cohorts spanning
adolescence and early adulthood, such as patients
aged 12– 25 or 13– 25 years, is interpreted as mixed
adolescent/young-adult evidence, whereas studies in
young nulligravid women aged up to 30 years are
considered supportive young -adult evidence rather
than strictly adolescent evidence.
This review provides a clinically oriented
synthesis of adolescent and early- onset adenomyosis.
We distinguish direct adolescent evidence from
supportive inference derived from young adult and
broader reproductive- age populations, and focus on
epidemiologic signals, early phenotypes, diagnostic
pitfalls, imaging interpretation, management
principles, and fertility- conscious longitudinal care.
Our aim is to support earlier recognition of clinically
meaningful disease while avoiding overdiagnosis and
inappropriate extrapolation from adult adenomyosis.
2. Literature identification strategy
This review was designed as a clinically oriented
narrative review of adolescent and early -onset
adenomyosis. PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science
were searched for English-language articles published
up to March 5, 2026. The search focused on four core
concepts: adenomyosis; adolescence or early -onset
disease; symptoms and comorbidity; and diagnosis,
management, or reproductive implications. The
database-specific search strategies are provided in
Supplementary Table S1.
Articles were considered eligible if they provided
clinically relevant information on adolescent or early-
onset adenomyosis, including disease burden,
symptoms, imaging phenotypes, adenomyosis–
endometriosis overlap, differential diagnosis,
management, follow-up, reproductive implications, or
relevant mechanisms. Direct adolescent evidence was
prioritized; mixed adolescent/young -adult studies
were interpreted as supportive early -onset evidence,
and adult studies were used only when adolescent -
specific data w ere unavailable. After duplicate
removal, titles and abstracts were screened by two
authors, followed by full -text assessment of
potentially relevant articles. Disagreements were
resolved through discussion with the senior author.
Supplementary Figure S1 summarizes the literature
identification process but should not be interpreted as
a PRISMA flow diagram; no formal risk- of-bias
assessment or quantitative synthesis was performed.
3. Epidemiologic signals and early
clinical phenotypes
3.1 Disease burden in symptomatic
adolescents and young women
The population-level epidemiology of adolescent
adenomyosis remains poorly defined. Most available
estimates come from imaging- based studies of
symptomatic adolescents and young women
evaluated in referral settings. Reported prevalence
figures should therefore be interpreted as indicators of
disease burden in selected clinical populations rather
than as estimates of adenomyosis prevalence in the
general adolescent population.
Even with this limitation, current evidence
suggests that adenomyosis is not uncommon among
highly symptomatic young patients. In a cohort of 267
adolescents aged 12 –20 years with severe
dysmenorrhea, Exacoustos et al. reported
ultrasonographic signs sugge stive of endometriosis
and/or adenomyosis in 106 patients (39.7%), with
adenomyosis identified in 47 patients, corresponding
to 17.6% of the total cohort [7]. In a cross -sectional
study of patients aged 13–25 years with dysmenorrhea
and/or heavy menstrual bleeding, Vannuccini et al.
identified adenomyosis in 27.4% of cases using
Morphological Uterus Sonographic Assessment
Int. J. Med. Sci. 2026, Vol. 23
https://www.medsci.org
3455
(MUSA) criteria, suggesting that symptom clustering
may help identify early-onset disease [5].
Evidence syntheses support this signal while
emphasizing heterogeneity. Vercellini et al. reported a
weighted pooled adenomyosis prevalence of 20.7%
(95% CI, 11.5–31.6; I²=94.8%) across six imaging-based
studies in symptomatic adolescents and young
women, with subgroup estimates of 16.9% (95% CI,
8.8–27.0; I²=91.2%) in adolescents and 29.7% (95% CI,
17.5–43.5; I²=85.6%) in young women. These data
suggest that adenomyosis -related imaging findings
are not uncommon in selected symptomatic
populations, but they do not provide a reliable
estimate of population prevalence in adolescents [8, 9].
Earlier MRI -based evidence also suggested that
adenomyosis-related junctional -zone changes may
emerge relatively early in reproductive life,
particularly in women with endo metriosis, although
these data were not derived from strictly adolescent
cohorts [10]. However, differences in diagnostic
criteria, imaging expertise, symptom selection, and
age grouping limit direct comparison across studies.
Current data therefore do not establish the true
prevalence of adolescent adenomyosis, but they do
indicate a clinically meaningful disease signal in
young patients with severe menstrual symptoms. The
key studies informing current understanding are
summarized in Table 1, and imaging-based prevalence
studies are summarized in Supplementary Table S2.
3.2 Early, focal and cystic phenotypes
Early-onset adenomyosis appears to differ from
the classic adult phenotype derived from
hysterectomy-based and advanced surgical series. In
adolescents and young women, adenomyosis is more
often described as mild, focal, or cystic rather than as
diffuse bulky myometrial involvement [12, 13, 18, 19].
This distinction is clinically important because under -
recognition in younger patients may reflect not only
low clinical suspicion, but also a mismatch between
early disease morphology and the traditional adult
image of adenomyosis.
Table 1. Key studies on adolescent and early-onset adenomyosis.
Study Evidence source/Population Diagnostic modality Key contribution
Exacoustos et al. 2025 [7] Direct adolescent cohort; 267
adolescents with severe dysmenorrhea
Ultrasound Adenomyosis was identified in 47 of 267 adolescents with severe
dysmenorrhea, supporting targeted ultrasound evaluation in
highly symptomatic patients.
Wilk et al. 2025 [8] Review-level adolescent evidence Literature review of
adolescent studies
Summarized prevalence, symptoms, and diagnostic pathways of
adolescent adenomyosis and reinforced that the disease is likely
underrecognized
Vercellini et al. 2025 [9] Mixed adolescent/young-adult
evidence synthesis
Imaging-based studies Reported a weighted pooled prevalence of 20.7% with high
heterogeneity, supporting a disease-burden signal in selected
symptomatic adolescents and young women.
Martire et al. 2024 [1] Review-level adolescent supportive
evidence
Literature review Framed adolescent adenomyosis as a challenging diagnosis with
complex management and highlighted the need for age- specific
approaches
Vannuccini et al. 2024 [5] Mixed adolescent/young-adult
evidence
Ultrasound using
MUSA criteria
Demonstrated that adenomyosis can be identified in
symptomatic adolescents/young women, particularly when
dysmenorrhea and heavy menstrual bleeding coexist
Zannoni et al. 2024 [11] Mixed adolescent/young-adult study
of patients with pelvic pain
Clinical and imaging-
based assessment
Highlighted adenomyosis–endometriosis overlap in young
patients with pelvic pain.
Exacoustos et al. 2022 [12] 43 adolescents aged 12–20 years with
ultrasonographically diagnosed
adenomyosis
Ultrasound Adenomyosis was predominantly mild to moderate, with no
severe cases identified; the outer myometrium and posterior
uterine wall were the most commonly affected sites.
Brosens et al. 2015 [13] Supportive evidence on cystic
adenomyosis in younger women
Imaging and pathology
literature
Described uterine cystic adenomyosis as a phenotype mainly
affecting younger women.
Mansouri et al. 2015 [14] Adolescent case series MRI before and after
hormonal suppression
Reported regression of MRI-visible adenomyosis after hormonal
suppression in adolescents
Ho et al. 2008[15]; Ho et al.
2009 [16]; Branquinho et al.
2012 [17]
Adolescent case reports Ultrasound, MRI,
and/or pathology
Reported adenomyotic cysts or juvenile cystic adenomyoma in
adolescent girls, indicating that early disease may present as
focal or cystic lesions
Dietrich 2010 [4] Early narrative-review supportive
evidence
Literature review Summarized the early evidence on adolescent adenomyosis and
emphasized diagnostic difficulty in teenagers
Takeuchi et al. 2010 [18] Juvenile cystic adenomyoma case
series; 9 cases
Imaging, laparoscopy,
histopathology
Described diagnosis, laparoscopic treatment, and pathology of
juvenile cystic adenomyoma
Itam et al. 2009 [3] Adolescent case report and literature
review
Imaging and clinical
diagnosis
One of the earliest reports highlighting that adenomyosis can
occur during adolescence and may present with severe
dysmenorrhea
Notes: Evidence source/population indicates whether each study provides direct adolescent evidence, mixed adolescent/young -adult evidence, review-level evidence, or
case-based supportive evidence. Case reports and case series were included to illustrate early fo cal or cystic phenotypes, not to estimate prevalence. Abbreviations: MRI,
magnetic resonance imaging; MUSA, Morphological Uterus Sonographic Assessment.
Int. J. Med. Sci. 2026, Vol. 23
https://www.medsci.org
3456
Among adolescent studies, adenomyosis is more
commonly classified as mild or moderate, whereas
severe diffuse disease appears relatively uncommon
[12]. Supportive evidence from young nulligravid
women aged 18–30 years points in the same direction,
suggesting that adenomyosis -like changes may
emerge early in reproductive life and may already be
associated with dysmenorrhea and heavier menstrual
bleeding [20]. Although such young adult data cannot
be treated as adolescent -specific evidence, they
provide trans itional support for the concept that
adenomyotic changes may precede the age range in
which the disease has historically been diagnosed.
Phenotypically, adolescent and early- onset
adenomyosis may be conceptualized as three broad
patterns: subtle diffuse inner- myometrial change,
focal inner-myometrial lesions, and cystic or juvenile
adenomyotic lesions. This framework is useful
because pheno types may influence symptom profile,
differential diagnosis, imaging interpretation, and
treatment intensity [12, 13]. Juvenile cystic
adenomyoma and related cystic lesions may present
with severe dysmenorrhea and disproportionate pain
despite localized disease [13, 15-18].
The predominance of mild, focal, and cystic
disease should not be interpreted as evidence that all
early lesions inevitably progress to diffuse adult
adenomyosis. Rather, current findings support a more
cautious interpretation: adolescent adenomyosis likely
represents a spectrum of early phenotypes with
incompletely characterized trajectories. The main
value of phenotype recognition lies in improving
diagnostic accuracy, avoiding both under -recognition
and overdiagnosis, and aligning management
intensity with the likely burden of disease. The early
phenotypic spectrum and its clinical implications are
summarized in Figure 1.
3.3 Comorbidity and key differential diagnoses
Adenomyosis in adolescents frequently coexists
with other gynecological disorders, most notably
endometriosis [1, 7, 8, 21, 22]. This overlap is clinically
important because it may increase symptom severity,
complicate imaging interpretation, and influence
treatment planning. In adolescent and early -onset
cohorts, severe dysmenorrhea, chronic pelvic pain,
and suspected or confirmed endometriosis repeatedly
emerge as the main clinical context in which
adenomyosis is identified.
Figure 1. Early phenotypic spectrum and clinical implications of adolescent adenomyosis. ACUM, accessory cavitated uterine malformation . Created with BioRender.com.
Int. J. Med. Sci. 2026, Vol. 23
https://www.medsci.org
3457
In one adolescent cohort reported by Exacoustos
et al., approximately 44% of adolescents diagnosed
with adenomyosis were found to have at least one
concomitant pelvic endometriotic lesion [12].
Likewise, Zannoni et al. reported a high burden of
both adenom yosis and endometriosis in adolescents
and young women with pelvic pain, with a significant
association between ovarian endometriosis and
adenomyosis [11]. These findings suggest that the two
disorders may share common pathogenic mechanisms
or developmental pathways.
At the same time, diagnostic assessment in
adolescents should remain attentive to important
differential diagnoses. Accessory cavitated uterine
malformation (ACUM), juvenile cystic adenomyoma,
and congenital uterine anomalies may mimic
adenomyosis on imagi ng and may also present with
severe progressive dysmenorrhea [23 -26]. This is
especially relevant in younger patients because cystic
lesions and unusual uterine morphology may be over-
attributed to adenomyosis if imaging is interpreted
without adequate dev elopmental and anatomic
context.
For this reason, comorbidity assessment and
differential diagnosis should be considered together in
adolescent practice. The key clinical question is not
simply whether adenomyosis is present, but whether
the patient’s symptoms and imaging findings are best
explained by isolated adenomyosis, adenomyosis with
endometriosis overlap, or an alternative structural
condition requiring a different management pathway.
This broader diagnostic frame is essential to avoid
both under -recognition of overlap disease and
misclassification of congenital or cystic lesions as
adenomyosis.
4. Biological plausibility and
mechanistic heterogeneity
The pathogenesis of adenomyosis remains
incompletely understood and is likely multifactorial.
Altered uterine peristalsis, tissue injury and repair,
hormonal dysregulation, inflammation, and fibrotic
remodeling may contribute to disease initiation and
progression. Different anatomical phenotypes,
including diffuse, focal, cystic, inner -myometrial,
outer-myometrial, and endometriosis -associated
disease, may therefore arise through partially distinct
pathways rather than through a single uniform
mechanism [27, 28].
Junctional-zone dysfunction and tissue injury -
repair models provide one plausible explanation for
early inner -myometrial disease, linking severe
dysmenorrhea, uterine biomechanics, and subtle
inner-myometrial or focal imaging changes [27, 28].
Other propos ed mechanisms, including metaplastic
transformation, stem/progenitor -cell differentiation,
and outside -to-inside extension in endometriosis-
associated phenotypes, may help explain focal, cystic,
outer-myometrial, or overlap disease [28-30].
However, the adolescent relevance of these
mechanisms remains inferential. Most mechanistic
and molecular studies are based on adult tissue or
surgical populations with established disease.
Therefore, current pathophysiological models should
be interpreted as biologically plausible explanations
for early-onset phenotypes rather than as adolescent -
specific evidence.
5. Diagnosis in adolescents: from clinical
suspicion to imaging interpretation
The diagnosis of adenomyosis has shifted from
postoperative histopathological confirmation to non-
invasive recognition based on symptoms and imaging.
This shift is particularly relevant in adolescents and
young women, in whom earlier identification may
improve symptom control and reduce delayed
recognition of underlying gynecological disease. At
the same time, diagnosis in this age group remains
challenging because menstrual pain is often
normalized, imaging findings may be subtle, and age-
specific diagnost ic thresholds have not been fully
established. Diagnostic evaluation should therefore be
regarded as a structured, risk -based process rather
than a single imaging event. Symptom severity,
response to first -line treatment, suspected
endometriosis overlap, a nd imaging phenotype all
contribute to diagnostic confidence.
5.1 Clinical red flags
The most important clinical clue is severe
dysmenorrhea. In adolescent cohorts with ultrasound-
diagnosed adenomyosis, dysmenorrhea is reported in
most patients, often in highly symptomatic referral
settings [8, 12]. Imaging findings suggestive of
endometriosis and/or adenomyosis have also been
identified in a substantial proportion of adolescents
with severe dysmenorrhea, indicating that marked
menstrual pain should not automatically be regarded
as functional or “normal” [7, 31].
Heavy menstrual bleeding is another important
signal. In symptomatic adolescents and young
women, adenomyosis appears to be identified more
often when dysmenorrhea and heavy menstrual
bleeding coexist than when pain is considered alone [5,
32]. Other featu res that should prompt earlier
evaluation include poor response to first -line
analgesics, chronic pelvic pain outside menstruation,
recurrent school or activity impairment, and
symptoms suggestive of coexisting endometriosis.
Family history may provide add itional context, but
Int. J. Med. Sci. 2026, Vol. 23
https://www.medsci.org
3458
current evidence is indirect and should not be treated
as diagnostic [22, 33, 34]. In practice, it is the pattern of
severe, persistent, treatment -resistant symptoms —
especially when accompanied by heavy menstrual
bleeding or chronic pelvic pain —that should trigger
targeted imaging assessment. The main clinical red
flags prompting targeted evaluation are summarized
in Figure 2.
5.2 Ultrasound, MRI, and phenotype-aware
interpretation
Ultrasound should remain the first -line imaging
modality for suspected adolescent adenomyosis
because it is accessible, repeatable, and capable of
identifying subtle or focal myometrial abnormalities
when performed by experienced operators [35 -37]. Its
value in adolescents lies not only in detecting diffuse
disease, but also in recognizing subtle inner -
myometrial changes, focal lesions, and cystic
phenotypes that may be more typical of early- onset
disease [5, 12]. The ultrasound route should also be
individualized. Transabdominal ultrasound is usually
the initial approach, particularly in younger or
sexually inactive patients, whereas transvaginal,
transrectal, or transperineal approaches may be
considered selectively according to sexual history,
patient acc eptability, local practice, and operator
expertise [38].
According to the revised Morphological Uterus
Sonographic Assessment (MUSA) consensus, direct
features include myometrial cysts, hyperechogenic
islands, and echogenic subendometrial lines or buds,
whereas indirect features include globular uterus,
asymmetrical myometrial thickening, fan -shaped
shadowing, translesional vascularity, and an irregular
or interrupted junctional zone [39]. Because diagnostic
performance remains operator- dependent,
standardized acquisition and reporting are essential
[36, 40]. In adolescents, direct features or multiple
concordant findings in a highly symptomatic patient
may increase diagnostic confidence, whereas isolate d
indirect or equivocal findings should prompt cautious
interpretation, expert review, or interval reassessment.
MRI has a complementary role when ultrasound
findings are inconclusive, lesion phenotype is atypical,
or the differential diagnosis includes congenital
anomalies, cystic lesions, or deep infiltrating
endometriosis [37, 41 -43]. Typical MRI features
include junctional-zone thickening or irregularity,
poorly defined low -signal-intensity myometrial areas
on T2-weighted imaging, and cystic change in selected
phenotypes. In adolescents, MRI is most useful when
severe pelvic pain persists despite non -diagnostic
ultrasound, when outer -myometrial disease or
endometriosis overlap is suspected, or when
differentiation from congenital uterine anomalies is
required [44, 45]. However, MRI should not be used as
a routine second -line test for all adolescents with
dysmenorrhea. Cost, access, and the lack of robust age-
specific thresholds limit its role as a screening
modality. It is best used as a targeted problem-solving
tool.
Figure 2. Clinical red flags prompting targeted evaluation of suspected adolescent adenomyosis. Abbreviations: HMB, heavy menstrual bleeding; MRI, magnetic resonance
imaging. Created with BioRender.com.
Int. J. Med. Sci. 2026, Vol. 23
https://www.medsci.org
3459
5.3 Emerging adjuncts, diagnostic pitfalls, and
overdiagnosis
Elastography, artificial intelligence, and
radiomics may eventually refine image -based
assessment of adenomyosis, but they should currently
be regarded as investigational adjuncts rather than
routine tools in adolescent diagnostic pathways.
Elastography is biologically plausible because
adenomyosis is associated with fibrosis and
myometrial remodeling, and adult studies suggest
that tissue stiffness may help distinguish adenomyosis
from normal myometrium or correlate with symptom
burden [46 -49]. Similarly, artificial intelligence and
radiomics have shown promise in adult ultrasound
and MRI datasets, but most models have been
developed in tertiary -care populations with
established disease, and their thresholds,
generalizability, and clinical value in adolescents
remain uncertain [50, 51].
Earlier recognition also increases the risk of
overdiagnosis. In adolescents, this risk is especially
important because the uterus is still developing,
imaging findings may be subtle or nonspecific, and
thresholds for pathologic versus physiologic
myometrial variation remain insufficiently defined.
One major pitfall is over -attributing severe
dysmenorrhea to adenomyosis based on isolated
indirect or equivocal imaging findings. The opposite
problem is failure to recognize early disease because it
does not resemble the classic diffuse adult phenotype.
A balanced diagnostic strategy therefore requires
correlation between symptom severity, imaging
phenotype, and differential diagnosis rather than
reliance on a single sign or label.
Interobserver variability remains another
challenge. Even with revised MUSA terminology,
reproducibility of some ultrasound features is
imperfect, highlighting the need for standardized
acquisition, reporting, and reader training [39, 52].
Differential dia gnosis must also remain broad,
particularly in adolescents with severe progressive
dysmenorrhea and atypical cystic or structural
findings. Overall, current evidence supports a risk -
based diagnostic model: adolescents with severe
symptoms, direct MUSA feat ures, multiple
concordant imaging features, or overlap disease
warrant closer evaluation and follow -up, whereas
mild symptoms with isolated or equivocal findings
may justify observation and reassessment. This
approach acknowledges both the clinical importa nce
of adolescent adenomyosis and the uncertainty
surrounding its earliest imaging manifestations.
6. Management of adolescent adenomyo-
sis: symptom-oriented longitudinal
care with attention to future
reproductive options
Management of adolescent adenomyosis should
be individualized and proportionate. Unlike
management in older adults, treatment in adolescents
must address symptom relief, bleeding control, long-
term adherence, avoidance of overtreatment, and
preservation of future reproductive options. Because
adolescent-specific therapeutic evidence remains
limited, management should be guided by symptom
burden, imaging phenotype, suspected overlap
disease, treatment response, and patient priorities,
with cautious extrapola tion from adult adenomyosis,
adolescent dysmenorrhea or endometriosis, and
broader chronic pelvic pain care.
6.1 Stepwise medical management
For most adolescents, initial treatment is
conservative and symptom- oriented. Non -steroidal
anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are appropriate
first-line therapy for mild or moderate dysmenorrhea,
as recommended in adolescent dysmenorrhea
guidance [53, 54]. This approach is especially
reasonable when imaging findings are uncertain or
when symptoms remain manageable without long -
term suppression.
When symptoms are recurrent, severe, or
insufficiently controlled, hormonal suppression
becomes the main therapeutic option. Combined
hormonal contraceptives and progestins are
commonly used on the basis of adolescent
dysmenorrhea/endometriosis guidance an d
extrapolation from adult adenomyosis management,
whereas gonadotropin- releasing hormone agonists
should be reserved for selected refractory cases
because of bone-health concerns and the need for add-
back therapy [53, 55, 56]. Small adolescent case -series
evidence also suggests that hormonal suppression
may reduce MRI -visible adenomyosis in selected
patients, but this remains low-level evidence [14].
Treatment selection should also consider
tolerability, bleeding pattern, expected duration of
use, adherence, contraceptive needs, bone health, and
endocrine maturation. Medical therapy should
therefore be presented as an adjustable longitudinal
strategy rather than as a fixed long -term solution for
all patients.
6.2 Refractory or complex disease
Persistent symptoms despite appropriate first -
line treatment should prompt reassessment rather
than automatic escalation. In adolescents, refractory
symptoms may reflect coexisting endometriosis,
Int. J. Med. Sci. 2026, Vol. 23
https://www.medsci.org
3460
pelvic floor dysfunction, central pain amplification,
poor adherence, treatment intolerance, or an
alternative structural diagnosis. Treatment response
should therefore be interpreted cautiously:
improvement in bleeding or cyclic dysmenorrhea after
hormonal suppression may reflect suppression of
endometrial, adenomyotic, or endometriotic activity,
whereas persistent acyclic pelvic pain, bowel or
urinary symptoms, or functional impairment should
raise suspicion of coexisting endometriosis or mixed
pain mecha nisms. Recent longitudinal evidence on
adenomyosis with coexisting endometriosis also
supports individualized follow -up according to
symptom evolution, imaging phenotype, treatment
exposure, and reproductive priorities [57].
Management should therefore inc lude review of the
original diagnosis, reassessment of symptom pattern,
expert imaging review when needed, and evaluation
for overlap disease [2].
For patients with disabling pain, recurrent
functional impairment, or suspected mixed pain
mechanisms, management may extend beyond
uterine-directed therapy to include pelvic floor
physical therapy, pain education, psychological or
behavioral support, and multidisciplinary pain care,
consistent with broader chronic pelvic pain guidance
[58]. The key principle is that refractory adolescent
adenomyosis should not be managed solely as a
uterine imaging abnormality; pain mechanisms and
functional consequences also need attention.
6.3 Selected intervention and longitudinal
follow-up
Surgical or interventional treatment should be
reserved for carefully selected adolescents with focal
cystic lesions or juvenile cystic adenomyoma
refractory to medical treatment, as supporting
evidence is limited to case reports and small case series
[18]. In such cases, uterus -sparing laparoscopic
excision may be considered when severe symptoms
persist despite appropriate medical therapy and when
expert imaging identifies a discrete lesion. Potential
risks, including uterine scarring, recurrence, and
uncertain reproductive consequences, should be
discussed before intervention.
High-intensity focused ultrasound and other
non-invasive techniques have been explored as
fertility-preserving approaches in adenomyosis, but
adolescent evidence remains very limited. These
modalities should currently be regarded as selective or
investigational rather than routine care for young
patients [59].
Longitudinal follow -up is central to adolescent
care. Symptoms, menstrual pattern, treatment
tolerance, imaging phenotype, overlap disease, and
reproductive priorities may all change over time.
Follow-up should therefore include planned
reassessment rather than a one -time treatment
decision. During transition to adult care, patients with
suspected or confirmed adenomyosis should ideally
have a cle ar summary of symptom history, imaging
findings, prior treatments, treatment response, and
unresolved concerns. This is particularly important for
those with persistent pain, repeated imaging
abnormalities, suspected endometriosis overlap, or
future fertility concerns.
Overall, current evidence supports a stepwise
and fertility- conscious model: medical treatment for
most symptomatic adolescents, broader
multidisciplinary assessment for refractory or
complex disease, and invasive treatment only for
selected focal or cystic lesions. This approach balances
symptom control with caution, avoids unnecessary
intervention, and preserves future reproductive
options. A symptom- and phenotype-based diagnostic
and management pathway for suspected adolescent
adenomyosis is summarized in Figure 3.
7. Discussion
Adolescent and early -onset adenomyosis is best
approached as a clinically relevant but still
incompletely defined condition. The available
evidence supports considering adenomyosis in
adolescents and young women with severe or
treatment-resistant dysmenorr hea, heavy menstrual
bleeding, chronic pelvic pain, or coexisting
endometriosis. At the same time, early imaging
findings cannot be interpreted in isolation. Their
clinical meaning depends on symptom burden,
phenotype, developmental context, and alternativ e
diagnoses.
This distinction is important in daily practice.
Some adolescents with persistent symptoms may be
under-investigated because adenomyosis is still
perceived as a disease of older reproductive age.
Others may be overdiagnosed when subtle or
equivocal myometr ial findings are treated as
definitive disease. A risk- based approach is therefore
more appropriate than a simple positive -or-negative
diagnostic label. Multiple concordant imaging features
in a highly symptomatic patient carry different clinical
weight fr om an isolated finding in a mildly
symptomatic adolescent.
Fertility counselling is another area where
caution is essential. Adult studies have linked
adenomyosis with infertility, implantation failure,
poorer assisted- reproduction outcomes, and adverse
obstetric events, particularly in patients with
endometriosis overlap or specific imaging phenotypes
[60-62]. Different phenotypes may also carry different
Int. J. Med. Sci. 2026, Vol. 23
https://www.medsci.org
3461
reproductive implications, although this evidence is
mainly derived from adult, infertility, or assisted -
reproduction populations [63]. Available studies
suggest that symptomatic and diffuse adenomyosis
may be more strongly associated with reduced clinical
pregnancy or live -birth rates and increased
miscarriage risk after in vitro fertilization than
asymptomatic adenomyosis [64]. Recent subtype -
based evidence also suggests that internal or mixed
adenomyosis may be associated with lower live -birth
rates and higher early pregnancy loss after frozen
embryo transfer, whereas external adenomyosis may
have less apparent impact [65]. Disease burden and
lesion localization may therefore be relevant when
counselling young patients, particularly those with
progressive imaging findings, coexisting
endometriosis, or future fertility concerns [66, 67].
However, these observations should not be directly
extrapolated to adolescents; instead, they support
cautious counselling, avoidance of unnecessary
uterine intervention, and longitudinal documentation
of symptoms, imaging findings, and treatment
response.
A strength of this review is that it separates direct
adolescent evidence from evidence extrapolated from
young adult or broader adult populations. This
distinction matters because applying adult
adenomyosis data too directly to adolescents may
exaggerate diagnostic certainty, treatment
implications, or reproductive risk. The review also
brings together epidemiologic signals, early
phenotypes, biological plausibility, diagnostic
challenges, management principles, and fertility -
conscious care within a life-course framework.
Figure 3. Symptom- and phenotype-based diagnostic and management pathway for suspected adolescent or early -onset adenomyosis. Direct and indirect
MUSA features should be interpreted in clinical context, because isolated indirect or equivocal findings may be nonspecific i n adolescents. Abbreviations: ACUM, accessory
cavitated uterine malformation; CPP, chronic pelvic pain; CUAs, c ongenital uterine anomalies; HMB, heavy menstrual bleeding; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; MUSA,
Morphological Uterus Sonographic Assessment; NSAIDs, non- steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs; US, ultrasound. Created with BioRender.com.
Int. J. Med. Sci. 2026, Vol. 23
https://www.medsci.org
3462
The limitations mainly reflect the state of the
literature. Most studies are cross -sectional, imaging-
based, and drawn from symptomatic or referral
populations. Adolescents are often analyzed together
with young adult women, making it difficult to define
true prevalence, natural history, and phenotype-
specific outcomes in strictly adolescent cohorts.
Treatment evidence is limited, and most management
strategies remain extrapolated from adult adeno -
myosis, adolescent dysmenorrhea, endometriosis, or
chronic pelvic pain care. Mechanistic and reproductive
data are also largely adult-derived.
Future studies should move beyond earlier
detection alone. Prospective multicenter cohorts with
standardized symptom assessment, ultrasound and
MRI reporting, and long-term follow-up are needed to
determine which early lesions are clinically
meaningful. Age -conscious diagnostic criteria may
help distinguish disease from normal developmental
variation or equivocal myometrial findings. Further
work should also clarify whether focal, diffuse, cystic,
inner-myometrial, outer- myometrial, or
endometriosis-associated phenotypes differ in
symptom persistence, treatment escalation,
progression, and reproductive outcomes.
Overall, the key question is not simply whether
adenomyosis can be detected earlier, but which
adolescents require closer follow -up and which
management strategies improve long -term pain
control, bleeding patterns, quality of life, and
reproductive outcomes.
Supplementary Material
Supplementary figure and tables.
https://www.medsci.org/v23p3453s1.pdf
References
1. Martire FG, d'Abate C, Schettini G, Cimino G, Ginetti A, Colombi I, et al.
Adenomyosis and Adolescence: A Challenging Diagnosis and Complex
Management. Diagnostics (Basel). 2024; 14: 2344.
2. Vercellini P, Bandini V, Vigano P, Ambruoso D, Cetera GE, Somigliana E.
Proposal for targeted, neo -evolutionary-oriented secondary prevention of
early-onset endometriosis and adenomyosis. Part II: medical interventions.
Hum Reprod. 2024; 39: 18-34.
3. Itam SP, 2nd, Ayensu -Coker L, Sanchez J, Zurawin RK, Dietrich JE.
Adenomyosis in the adolescent population: a case report and review of the
literature. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2009; 22: e146-7.
4. Dietrich JE. An update on adenomyosis in the adolescent. Curr Opin Obstet
Gynecol. 2010; 22: 388-92.
5. Vannuccini S, Meleca C, Toscano F, Mertino P, Pampaloni F, Fambrini M, et al.
Adenomyosis diagnosis among adolescents and young women with
dysmenorrhoea and heavy menstrual bleeding. Reprod Biomed Online. 2024;
48: 103768.
6. Santulli P, Vannuccini S, Bourdon M, Chapron C, Petraglia F. Adenomyosis:
the missed disease. Reprod Biomed Online. 2025; 50: 104837.
7. Exacoustos C, Mandosi C, Nocita E, Selntigia A, Iacobini F, Monaco G, et al.
Severe dysmenorrhea in adolescents need non-invasive ultrasound evaluation
to early detect endometriosis/adenomyosis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol.
2025; 313: 114639.
8. Wilk K, Zieba -Domalik M, Wilk K, Bednarz K, Stojko R, Drosdzol -Cop A.
Prevalence of adenomyosis in adolescents: diagnostic process and symptoms.
Systematic review. Ginekol Pol. 2025; 96: 776-80.
9. Vercellini P, Buffo C, Bandini V, Sonia Cipriani, Francesca Chiaffarino, Paola
Vigano, et al. Prevalence of adenomyosis in symptomatic adolescents and
young women: a systematic review and meta -analysis. F&S Reviews. 2025; 6:
100083.
10. Kunz G, Herbertz M, Beil D, Huppert P, Leyendecker G. Adenomyosis as a
disorder of the early and late human reproductive period. Reprod Biomed
Online. 2007; 15: 681-5.
11. Zannoni L, Del Forno S, Raimondo D, Arena A, Giaquinto I, Paradisi R, et al.
Adenomyosis and endometriosis in adolescents and young women with pelvic
pain: prevalence and risk factors. Minerva Pediatr (Torino). 2024; 76: 57-63.
12. Exacoustos C, Lazzeri L, Martire FG, Russo C, Martone S, Centini G, et al.
Ultrasound Findings of Adenomyosis in Adolescents: Type and Grade of the
Disease. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2022; 29: 291-9 e1.
13. Brosens I, Gordts S, Habiba M, Benagiano G. Uterine Cystic Adenomyosis: A
Disease of Younger Women. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2015; 28: 420-6.
14. Mansouri R, Santos XM, Bercaw -Pratt JL, Dietrich JE. Regression of
Adenomyosis on Magnetic Resonance Imaging after a Course of Hormonal
Suppression in Adolescents: A Case Series. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2015; 28:
437-40.
15. Ho ML, Raptis C, Hulett R, McAlister WH, Moran K, Bhalla S. Adenomyotic
cyst of the uterus in an adolescent. Pediatr Radiol. 2008; 38: 1239-42.
16. Ho ML, Ratts V, Merritt D. Adenomyotic cyst in an adolescent girl. J Pediatr
Adolesc Gynecol. 2009; 22: e33-8.
17. Branquinho MM, Marques AL, Leite HB, Silva IS. Juvenile cystic adenomyoma.
BMJ Case Rep. 2012; 2012: bcr2012007006.
18. Takeuchi H, Kitade M, Kikuchi I, Kumakiri J, Kuroda K, Jinushi M. Diagnosis,
laparoscopic management, and histopathologic findings of juvenile cystic
adenomyoma: a review of nine cases. Fertil Steril. 2010; 94: 862-8.
19. Bourdon M, Oliveira J, Marcellin L, Santulli P, Bordonne C, Maitrot Mantelet
L, et al. Adenomyosis of the inner and outer myometrium are associated with
different clinical profiles. Hum Reprod. 2021; 36: 349-57.
20. Pinzauti S, Lazzeri L, Tosti C, Centini G, Orlandini C, Luisi S, et al.
Transvaginal sonographic features of diffuse adenomyosis in 18-30-year -old
nulligravid women without endometriosis: association with symptoms.
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015; 46: 730-6.
21. Hall EM, Ravelo AE, Aronoff SC, Del Vecchio MT. Systematic review and meta-
analysis of the etiology of heavy menstrual bleeding in 2,770 adolescent
females. BMC Womens Health. 2024; 24: 136.
22. Palumbo M, Della Corte L, Ascione M, D'Angelo G, Colacurci D, Baldini GM,
et al. Genetic and Epigenetic Components in the Pathogenesis of Adenomyosis
and Endometriosis in Adolescents. Biomedicines. 2025; 13: 2988.
23. Shen T, Yuan H, Cao H, Liu J, Duan X, Chen S, et al. Case Report: Preoperative
ultrasonographic diagnosis of accessory cavitated uterine malformation: a case
series report and narrative review. Front Oncol. 2025; 15: 1658448.
24. Sun R, Liu X, Wei N, Li X, Zou Y, Wang Y. Ultrasonographic Imaging Features
of Accessory Cavitated Uterine Malformations and Application to Diagnosis. J
Clin Ultrasound. 2025; 53: 1707-12.
25. Ajjammanavar V, Koteshwara S, Ranganath K, S J. Successful laparoscopic
management of accessory cavitated uterine malformation misdiagnosed as
non-communicating rudimentary horn in an unmarried woman. BMJ Case
Rep. 2025; 18: e266026.
26. Tunc M, Onalan G, Coskun M, Haberal AN, Kuscu UE. Accessory cavitated
uterine mass: A rare cause of severe dysmenorrhea. J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc.
2026; 27: 222-5.
27. Brosens JJ, de Souza NM, Barker FG. Uterine junctional zone: function and
disease. Lancet. 1995; 346: 558-60.
Int. J. Med. Sci. 2026, Vol. 23
https://www.medsci.org
3463
28. Garcia-Solares J, Donnez J, Donnez O, Dolmans MM. Pathogenesis of uterine
adenomyosis: invagination or metaplasia? Fertil Steril. 2018; 109: 371-9.
29. Cousins FL, O DF, Gargett CE. Endometrial stem/progenitor cells and their
role in the pathogenesis of endometriosis. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol.
2018; 50: 27-38.
30. Zhai J, Vannuccini S, Petraglia F, Giudice LC. Adenomyosis: Mechanisms and
Pathogenesis. Semin Reprod Med. 2020; 38: 129-43.
31. Sanfilippo J, Erb T. Evaluation and management of dysmenorrhea in
adolescents. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2008; 51: 257-67.
32. Habiba M, Guo SW, Benagiano G. Adenomyosis and Abnormal Uterine
Bleeding: Review of the Evidence. Biomolecules. 2024; 14: 616.
33. Yang Q, Zhong F, Liu X, Hong J, Chen L, Lin H, et al. Identification of novel
causally related genes in adenomyosis: An integrated summary data-based
Mendelian randomization study and bioinformatics analysis. Medicine
(Baltimore). 2025; 104: e42768.
34. Kloeve-Mogensen K, Rohde PD, Twisttmann S, Nygaard M, Koldby KM,
Steffensen R, et al. Polygenic Risk Score Prediction for Endometriosis. Front
Reprod Health. 2021; 3: 793226.
35. Valdes-Bango M, Ros C, Daza M, Rius M, Gracia M, Martinez-Zamora M, et al.
Internal and external adenomyosis phenotypes: ultrasound features and
association with clinical outcomes. Hum Reprod. 2024: deae105.
36. Giorgi M, Pazzaglia E, Palermo R, Aguzzi A, De Gobbi V, Bertoldo L, et al.
Learning Curve of the Transvaginal Ultrasound Exam for Adenomyosis: A
CUSUM Analysis. J Ultrasound Med. 2026; 45: 145-53.
37. Dev H, Falkner NM, Lee E. Navigating Complexity: Review and Updates of
Endometriosis and Adenomyosis Imaging. Br J Radiol. 2026; 99: 656-68.
38. Deslandes A, Pannucio C, Parasivam S, Balogh M, Short A. How to perform a
gynaecological ultrasound in the paediatric or adolescent patient. Australas J
Ultrasound Med. 2020; 23: 10-21.
39. Harmsen MJ, Van den Bosch T, de Leeuw RA, Dueholm M, Exacoustos C,
Valentin L, et al. Consensus on revised definitions of Morphological Uterus
Sonographic Assessment (MUSA) features of adenomyosis: results of modified
Delphi procedure. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2022; 60: 118-31.
40. Pereira A, Franco J, Machado FS, Geber S. Accuracy of Transvaginal
Ultrasound in the Diagnosis of Intrauterine Lesions. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet.
2021; 43: 530-4.
41. Zhang M, Bazot M, Tsatoumas M, Munro MG, Reinhold C. MRI of
Adenomyosis: Where Are We Today? Can Assoc Radiol J. 2023; 74: 58-68.
42. Celli V, Dolciami M, Ninkova R, Ercolani G, Rizzo S, Porpora MG, et al. MRI
and Adenomyosis: What Can Radiologists Evaluate? Int J Environ Res Public
Health. 2022; 19: 5840.
43. Isaacson K, Loring M. Symptoms of Adenomyosis and Overlapping Diseases.
Semin Reprod Med. 2020; 38: 144-50.
44. El-Ali AM, Tong A, Smereka P, Lala SV. MRI for endometriosis in adolescent
patients. Pediatr Radiol. 2025; 55: 24-35.
45. Chapron C, Tosti C, Marcellin L, Bourdon M, Lafay -Pillet MC, Millischer AE,
et al. Relationship between the magnetic resonance imaging appearance of
adenomyosis and endometriosis phenotypes. Hum Reprod. 2017; 32: 1393-401.
46. Pongpunprut S, Panburana P, Wibulpolprasert P, Waiyaput W, Sroyraya M,
Chansoon T, et al. A Comparison of Shear Wave Elastography between Normal
Myometrium, Uterine Fibroids, and Adenomyosis: A Cross -Sectional Study.
Int J Fertil Steril. 2022; 16: 49-54.
47. Ren Q, Dong X, Yuan M, Jiao X, Sun H, Pan Z, et al. Application of elastography
to diagnose adenomyosis and evaluate the degree of dysmenorrhea: a
prospective observational study. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2023; 21: 98.
48. Zorlu U, Yilmazer Zorlu SN, Elmas B. The role of shear wave elastography in
predicting clinical symptoms in adenomyosis: A prospective observational
study with a machine learning approach. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2025; 51:
e70037.
49. Kol SQ, Wassenaar NPM, de Leeuw RA, Bipat S. Magnetic resonance
elastography (MRE) for the evaluation of fibrosis in patients with benign
uterine disorders: a systematic review. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2026; 51: 4106-17.
50. Sun M, Wang J, Xu P, Zhu L, Zou G, Chen S, et al. Development and validation
of MRI-based radiomics model for clinical symptom stratification of extrinsic
adenomyosis. Ann Med. 2025; 57: 2534521.
51. Zhao Q, Yang T, Xu C, Hu J, Shuai Y, Zou H, et al. Automatic diagnosis for
adenomyosis in ultrasound images by deep neural networks. Eur J Obstet
Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2024; 301: 128-34.
52. Kadam N, Khalid S, Jayaprakasan K. How Reproducible Are the Ultrasound
Features of Adenomyosis Defined by the Revised MUSA Consensus? J Clin
Med. 2025; 14: 456.
53. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 760: Dysmenorrhea and Endometriosis in the
Adolescent. Obstet Gynecol. 2018; 132: e249-e58.
54. Sachedina A, Todd N. Dysmenorrhea, Endometriosis and Chronic Pelvic Pain
in Adolescents. J Clin Res Pediatr Endocrinol. 2020; 12: 7-17.
55. Becker CM, Bokor A, Heikinheimo O, Horne A, Jansen F, Kiesel L, et al. ESHRE
guideline: endometriosis. Hum Reprod Open. 2022; 2022: hoac009.
56. Dason ES, Maxim M, Sanders A, Papillon -Smith J, Ng D, Chan C, et al.
Guideline No. 437: Diagnosis and Management of Adenomyosis. J Obstet
Gynaecol Can. 2023; 45: 417-29 e1.
57. Martire FG, d'Abate C, Costantini E, De Bonis M, Sorrenti G, Centini G, et al.
Sonographic and Clinical Progression of Adenomyosis and Coexisting
Endometriosis: Long-Term Insights and Management Perspectives. J Pers Med.
2025; 15: 538.
58. Allaire C, Yong PJ, Bajzak K, Jarrell J, Lemos N, Miller C, et al. Guideline No.
445: Management of Chronic Pelvic Pain. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2024; 46:
102283.
59. Zhang G, Li L, Sun M, Yu X. Progress in High Intensity Focused Ultrasound
Ablation for Fertility Preservation Therapy of Uterine Fibroids and
Adenomyosis. Reprod Sci. 2025; 32: 15-25.
60. Nirgianakis K, Kalaitzopoulos DR, Schwartz ASK, Spaanderman M, Kramer
BW, Mueller MD, et al. Fertility, pregnancy and neonatal outcomes of patients
with adenomyosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Reprod Biomed
Online. 2021; 42: 185-206.
61. Horton J, Sterrenburg M, Lane S, Maheshwari A, Li TC, Cheong Y.
Reproductive, obstetric, and perinatal outcomes of women with adenomyosis
and endometriosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod
Update. 2019; 25: 592-632.
62. Etrusco A, Agrifoglio V, D'Amato A, De Nigris A, Leone Roberti Maggiore U,
Di Donna MC, et al. The ADELIN analysis: the presence of ADenomyosis and
its effects on matErnal, neonataL, and obstetrIc outcomes: a systematic review
and meta-aNalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2026; 234: 919-79.
63. Kolovos G, Kalampokas T, Dedes I, Vlahos N, Mueller M. The impact of
adenomyosis localization in myometrium on fertility and pregnancy outcomes:
a narrative systematic review of the literature. Front Reprod Health. 2026; 8:
1748474.
64. Wang XL, Xu ZW, Huang YY, Lin S, Lyu GR. Different subtypes of ultrasound-
diagnosed adenomyosis and in vitro fertilization outcomes: A systematic
review and meta-analysis. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2023; 102: 657-68.
65. Wang L, Zheng H, Weng C, Su Q, Yang F, Wang F. Ultrasound-defined
adenomyosis subtypes and their impact on outcomes following frozen embryo
transfer: a propensity score-matched cohort study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol.
2025; 66: 786-94.
66. Ni X, Su X, Shi Y, Ru P, Liu Y, Lei S, et al. Association between adenomyosis
volume and adverse perinatal outcomes: multicenter cohort study. Ultrasound
Obstet Gynecol. 2024; 64: 678-86.
67. Xia Y, Yu H. Systematic review and meta-analysis of adverse pregnancy
outcomes with different types of adenomyosis. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2025; 171:
1054-65.