Comparison of the transfer of equal numbers of blastocysts versus cleavage-stage embryos after repeated failure of in vitro fertilization cycles
Observational
OA: closed
AI-generated summary
In women with repeated IVF failure, transferring equal numbers of blastocysts versus cleavage-stage embryos yielded similar clinical pregnancy and live-birth rates, indicating no superior outcome for blastocyst transfer.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of blastocyst transfer in women with at least two previously unsuccessful in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer (IVF-ET) attempts.
METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 238 couples (with previous implantation failures) had equal number (two) of cleavage-stage embryos (n = 143) or blastocysts (n = 95) transferred in the same IVF center.
RESULTS: The clinical pregnancy rates and live-birth rates were similar in the cleavage-stage embryo transfer group and the blastocyst group (35.6% vs. 40% and 32.1% vs. 35.7%; p > 0.05, respectively). Miscarriage rates (9.8% vs. 10.5%) and multiple pregnancy rates (15.6% vs. 23.6%) did not differ. Although implantation rate was higher with blastocyst transfer than that with day 3 transfer, it did not reach to a statistical significance (24.7% and 19%, respectively, p > 0.05).
CONCLUSION: Blastocyst transfer in ICSI cycles does not yield a better outcome than that obtained with cleavage-stage embryos in women who had unsuccessful IVF attempts previously.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
MeSH descriptors
Citation neighborhood (sparse)
Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.
Cited by (1)
Cited by (1)
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-10-25T09:32:14.900964+00:00
- pubmed
- last seen: 2026-10-08T21:13:06.373426+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-10-30T06:30:42.975179+00:00