Long-term success of endometrial resection: in everyday clinical practice, personal audit is more important than the knowledge of how the majority of surgeons perform

Maouris P, Panos Maouris, Jamieson R, Rosalind Jamieson
The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology · 2004 · vol. 44(1) , pp. 65–7 · doi:10.1111/j.1479-828X.2004.00168.x · PMID:15089872
Other OA: closed public-domain-us
View on PubMed View at publisher
⚙ AI-generated summary by qwen3.7-flash, 2026-09-03 ⓘ

This paper compares personal audit results of long-term endometrial resection success with published data to demonstrate the importance of personal audit in everyday clinical practice.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Results of a personal audit of the long-term success of endometrial resection are used for comparison with other published data to demonstrate the importance of personal audit.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Condition tags

endometriosis

MeSH descriptors

Endometriosis Endometrium Hysterectomy Medical Audit Medical Audit Practice Patterns, Physicians' Practice Patterns, Physicians' Practice Patterns, Physicians' Practice Patterns, Physicians' Quality of Life Quality of Life Uterine Hemorrhage Adult Adult Cohort Studies Cohort Studies Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometrium

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-10-18T09:30:06.152893+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-10-08T21:02:29.018211+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-10-20T06:27:24.728081+00:00
License: public-domain-us · commercial use OK · attribution required
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine