Evaluating the efficacy of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in managing chronic pelvic pain in endometriosis patients
Robin M,
Maylis Robin,
Durand C,
Camille Durand,
Léa Roux,
Roux L,
Berkelmans I,
Isabelle Berkelmans,
Benoit Peyronnet,
Peyronnet B,
Brochard C,
Charlène Brochard,
Ludivine Dion,
Dion L,
Lavoué V,
Vincent Lavoué,
Levêque J,
Jean Levêque,
Lous ML,
Maela Le Lous,
Nyangoh Timoh K,
Krystel Nyangoh Timoh
Non-randomised trial
OA: closed
CC-BY-NC-4.0
⚙
AI-generated summary
by gemini-2.5-flash-lite, 2026-08-01
ⓘ
Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) significantly reduced pain, pelvic sensitization, and catastrophization, while improving quality of life in endometriosis patients after three months of use.
⚙
AI-generated deep summary
by qwen3.7-flash, 2026-09-19
· read from full text
ⓘ
The provided text does not contain the body of a research paper but rather an error message from a website security system called Anubis. This page indicates that access to the content was blocked due to anti-scraping measures designed to prevent automated data collection by AI companies. The text explains the technical mechanism of the Proof-of-Work scheme used to deter such scraping activities. The paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: This study sought to assess the impact of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) prescribed by gynecologists in routine practice on pain, pelvic sensitization, quality of life, and catastrophization scores in patients with endometriosis and chronic pelvic pain.
METHODS: Thirty patients at the University Hospital of Rennes, France, diagnosed with endometriosis and experiencing chronic pelvic pain, received TENS between September 2022 and February 2023. Pain, pelvic sensitization, quality of life, catastrophization, and Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) were assessed using standardized and validated questionnaires before and after 1, 3, and 6 months of TENS device use.
RESULTS: After 1 month of device use, minimal changes occurred as improvement in the perception of treatment effectiveness by patients, sleep quality, and well-being (BPI). However, after 3 months, a significant improvement was observed in all these measures, which persisted at 6 months. Specifically, pain intensity (numerical rating scale) significantly decreased (p = 0.029), pelvic sensitization decreased (p = 0.039), quality of life assessed by the EHP-5 score improved (p = 0.003), and catastrophization scores significantly decreased (p = 0.003). Patients also reported a notable improvement in their perception of treatment effectiveness, particularly in terms of its impact on work and interactions with others (BPI).
CONCLUSIONS: TENS prescribed by gynecologists in routine practice may be effective in reducing pain, pelvic sensitization, and improving quality of life and catastrophization scores in patients with endometriosis and chronic pelvic pain. These findings are very useful in daily practice, especially for patients waiting for pain management physicians.
Full text
1,068 characters
· extracted from
oa-html
· click to expand
Making sure you're not a bot!
Loading...
You are seeing this because the administrator of this website has set up Anubis to protect the server against the scourge of AI companies aggressively scraping websites. This can and does cause downtime for the websites, which makes their resources inaccessible for everyone.
Anubis is a compromise. Anubis uses a Proof-of-Work scheme in the vein of Hashcash, a proposed proof-of-work scheme for reducing email spam. The idea is that at individual scales the additional load is ignorable, but at mass scraper levels it adds up and makes scraping much more expensive.
Ultimately, this is a placeholder solution so that more time can be spent on fingerprinting and identifying headless browsers (EG: via how they do font rendering) so that the challenge proof of work page doesn't need to be presented to users that are much more likely to be legitimate.
Please note that Anubis requires the use of modern JavaScript features that plugins like JShelter will disable. Please disable JShelter or other such plugins for this domain.
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
⚙
Ask this paper
AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text
· source: oa-html
ⓘ
Condition tags
endometriosischronic_pelvic_pain
MeSH descriptors
Chronic Pain
Chronic Pain
Chronic Pain
Chronic Pain
Chronic Pain
Chronic Pain
Chronic Pain
Chronic Pain
Chronic Pain
Chronic Pain
Chronic Pain
Chronic Pain
Chronic Pain
Chronic Pain
Chronic Pain
Chronic Pain
Chronic Pain
Chronic Pain
Chronic Pain
Chronic Pain
Citation neighborhood
(no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet.
This is a recent paper (2026) — citers
typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference
graph may still be filling in.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-10-19T06:17:24.038039+00:00
- pubmed
- last seen: 2026-10-19T06:12:14.990040+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-09-12T07:21:10.926195+00:00
License: CC-BY-NC-4.0
· commercial use OK
· attribution required
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine