Newly-developed colonoscope (PCF-PQ260L) is useful for patients with difficult colons.
This retrospective study found that the newly developed PCF-PQ260L colonoscope achieved comparable intubation rates to standard scopes while significantly reducing procedure time, pain, and sedative requirements in patients with difficult colons.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
This retrospective single-center study evaluated the PCF-PQ260L colonoscope, designed to facilitate total colonoscopy in patients with difficult anatomy such as adhesions or long colons. The researchers compared performance metrics and patient outcomes between this new device and standard scopes, noting that while baseline characteristics like height and weight differed, intubation rates remained comparable. Direct comparison on the same patients demonstrated that the new scope significantly reduced cecal intubation time and increased the proportion of patients experiencing no pain or requiring sedation. The paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.
Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
Full text
3,322 characters
· extracted from
oa-doi-fallback
· click to expand
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-10-18T09:30:06.152893+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-10-19T06:34:38.229974+00:00