Annual Repeat Rates of Laparoscopic Surgery: A Marker of Practice Variation

article OA: closed CC0 ⤵ 6 in-corpus citations
View on OpenAlex View on PubMed View at publisher
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-07

This study analyzed administrative data to find that repeat laparoscopic surgery rates vary significantly by individual woman and fiscal year, indicating potential overuse and the need for policy initiatives.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Use of laparoscopy is an area of interest owing to a previous report of significant numbers of repeat laparoscopic surgery in some women in Alberta, Canada. It was hypothesized that analyzing individual-woman rates of annual repeat procedures documents potential overuse of laparoscopic surgery. Administrative data concerning yearly individual specific laparoscopy experiences were obtained from Alberta Health and Wellness for the years 1996 to 2007. Rates of repeat diagnostic and operative laparoscopic procedures were determined for each fiscal year and analyzed using statistical process control methods. The rate of reoperation for an individual woman for both procedures has "special causes" of variation. Rates of reoperation within the fiscal year varied significantly. The reasons could include operating room access, initial clinical enthusiasm for new surgery, changing surgical skills, and changing processes in decision making. The presence of such variation will require policy initiatives to address high rates of annual repeat procedures.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Condition tags

mesh:D004715

MeSH descriptors

Laparoscopy Practice Patterns, Physicians' Reoperation Alberta Databases, Factual Endometriosis Endometriosis Female Humans Laparoscopy Medical Audit Quality of Health Care Reoperation

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (43)

Cited by (6)

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-06-04T01:30:01.192114+00:00
openalex
last seen: 2026-06-04T00:00:01.174412+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-05-13T22:17:00.782903+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-06-04T02:00:05.705006+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK