Was that hysterectomy really necessary? Audit of operative justification at the Aga Khan University Medical Centre, Karachi

Observational OA: closed CC0
View on OpenAlex View on PubMed View at publisher
⚙ AI-generated summary by gemini-2.5-flash-lite, 2026-06-09 ⓘ

This audit retrospectively analyzed 376 hysterectomies, finding 92.0% were justified based on preoperative diagnosis and pathological findings or validated criteria.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Hysterectomy in Pakistan, like in other parts of the world is considered to be overused in a number of cases. As a part of a quality assurance process at the Aga Khan University Medical Centre, Karachi, 376 hysterectomies performed between January, 1987 and December, 1989 were retrospectively analysed and the results are presented. In 250 (66.5%) cases, where pathology was expected to be found, the hysterectomy was considered justified if the preoperative diagnosis was verified by the pathology report of if significant alternate pathology was present. In 126 (33.5%) cases, where no pathology was expected to be found 'validation criteria' were used to ascertain justification of the procedure. The results showed justification rates of 83% for recurrent uterine bleeding, 85% for adenomyosis, 90% for adnexal masses and endometrial carcinoma, 95% for fibroids, 97% for pelvic relaxation and 100% each for pregnancy catastrophe, endometriosis, chronic pelvic inflammatory disease and premalignant disease of uterus and cervix. In general 92.0% of all hysterectomies in this series were justified.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Condition tags

endometriosisadenomyosis

MeSH descriptors

Hysterectomy Hysterectomy Hysterectomy Hysterectomy Medical Audit Medical Audit Adult Adult Aged Aged Female Female Hospitals, University Hospitals, University Humans Humans Middle Aged Middle Aged Pakistan Pakistan

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (11)

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-10-15T06:08:49.021275+00:00
openalex
last seen: 2026-06-04T00:00:01.174412+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-10-08T21:05:43.569505+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-10-15T06:24:24.424788+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK