Patient- and disease-related characteristics to anticipate segmental resection for isolated rectal endometriosis: a multicenter prospective study

Céline Bafort, Bafort C, Celine Bafort, Noémi Csibi, Csibi N, Bielen D, Didier Bielen, Gabriele Bislenghi, Bislenghi G, Bokor A, Attila Bokor, André D'Hoore, André D’Hoore, D'Hoore A, Fieuws S, Steffen Fieuws, Sára Horváth, Horváth S, Gernot Hudelist, Hudelist G, Christel Meuleman, Meuleman C, Szabó G, Gábor Szabó, Wolthuis A, A Wolthuis, Albert Wolthuis, Tomassetti C, Carla Tomassetti
Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology · 2026 · doi:10.1016/j.jmig.2026.09.006 · PMID:42732853 · W7212453387
Observational OA: bronze public-domain-us
🔓 Open OA copy View on OpenAlex View on PubMed View at publisher
⚙ AI-generated summary by qwen3.7-flash, 2026-09-21 ⓘ

This multicenter prospective study identified rectal nodule length on ultrasound and circumference on MRI as significant predictors for determining segmental resection versus conservative surgical treatment in patients with isolated rectal endometriosis.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To identify predictors for segmental resection in patients with an isolated rectal endometriotic nodule (i.e. involvement of at least the muscular layer in depth and up to 15cm to the anus). DESIGN: Multicenter prospective observational study evaluating 5 predefined predictors: bowel endometriosis syndrome (BENS) score, rectal nodule characteristics (length on ultrasound; height and circumference on MRI) and prior surgery in the rectovaginal space/bowel. SETTING: Two European referral centers: University Hospitals Leuven (Belgium) and Semmelweis University Hospital in Budapest (Hungary). PARTICIPANTS: 196 patients with rectal endometriosis were included: 104 (53.1%) underwent segmental resection and 92 (46.9%) had conservative surgical treatment. INTERVENTIONS: Laparoscopic surgery for rectal endometriosis using either a radical approach (with colorectal segmental resection) versus a more conservative approach aiming at preserving the rectal ampulla (by shaving or disc excision). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Uni- and multivariable logistic regression models, including the five predefined predictors as well as center of inclusion. Of these, only rectal nodule length on ultrasound (in mm) and MRI circumference (affected % of the outer contour) were associated with segmental resection. Rectal nodule length was 19.1±9.2mm in the conservative vs 25.8±11.9mm in the segmental resection group (p<0.001), MRI circumference was respectively 26.0±10.0% and 35.4±11.1% (p<0.001). Results of the multivariable regression model (only considering rectal nodule length and MRI circumference) confirm the importance of these two factors: odds ratio (OR) of 1.047 (95%CI 1.010-1.085; p=.0123) for the rectal nodule length and OR of 4.543 (95%CI 2.276-9.068; p<.001) for the (log2-transformed) MRI circumference. The discriminative ability (AUC) equaled 0.756 (0.688;0.824). CONCLUSION: Given that rectal nodule length and circumference have been identified as important predictors for the type of surgery, we propose to systematically evaluate them preoperatively to support surgical planning and patient counseling.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (38)

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-10-13T06:10:10.580696+00:00
openalex
last seen: 2026-10-13T06:02:51.577429+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-10-13T06:04:26.382623+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-09-15T06:33:26.365676+00:00
License: public-domain-us · commercial use OK · attribution required
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine