Methods of pain control during endometrial biopsy: A systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials
review
OA: closed
CC0
⤵ 3 in-corpus citations
Abstract
AIM: To review effectiveness of methods for reducing pain during endometrial biopsy. METHODS: statistic. For meta-analysis of pain scores, weighted mean difference with 95% confidence interval (CI) were estimated. RESULTS: Twenty-six studies were included in the review. Marginally significant reduction in the pain score during the procedure in participants with intrauterine lidocaine relative to control was observed (mean difference [MD] -1.31, 95% confidence interval [CI] -2.70 to 0.09, P = 0.07). Subgroup analysis showed that in studies that used low-pressure suction devices, intrauterine lidocaine was associated with statistically significant reduction in pain during the procedure (MD -2.22, 95% CI -3.72 to -0.73, P = 0.004). There was a significantly lower pain score during biopsy in the anesthetic spray group compared to control (MD -0.96, 95% CI -1.53 to -0.39, P = 0.001). Significant heterogeneity on types of intervention and outcome measures among studies that examined paracervical block and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) was observed. However, paracervical block and NSAID were associated with significant pain reduction compared to placebo in most of the related studies. CONCLUSION: Intrauterine anesthetics, anesthetic cervical spray, paracervical block and oral NSAID provide effective pain control during endometrial biopsy.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood
Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.
References (50)
- Defining a minimal clinically important difference for endometriosis-associated pelvic pain measured on a visual analog scale: analyses of two placebo-controlled, randomized trials via openalex
- Lidocaine and tenoxicam effectiveness for pain relief during Pipelle: Non-randomised double-blind placebo-controlled trial. via openalex
- The Efficacy of Lidocaine Spray in Pain Relief during Outpatient-Based Endometrial Sampling: A Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial via openalex
- Transcervical intrauterine levobupivacaine infusion or paracervical block for pain control during endometrial biopsy via openalex
- Vaginal Misoprostol versus a Rectal Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drug to Reduce Pain during Pipelle Endometrial Biopsies: A Prospective, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial via openalex
- doi:10.1007/s00404-011-2111-7 via openalex
- doi:10.1097/00006250-200003000-00006 via openalex
- doi:10.1002/9780470712184.ch8 via openalex
- doi:10.1177/0962280216669183 via openalex
- W11897945 via openalex
- W166680467 via openalex
- W265703122 via openalex
- W1410884474 via openalex
- W1593619936 via openalex
- doi:10.1097/01.aog.0000165272.62416.61 via openalex
- doi:10.1163/156856903767650899 via openalex
- doi:10.1002/sim.1186 via openalex
- doi:10.1097/01.aog.0000109519.74229.30 via openalex
- doi:10.3109/01443615.2015.1060201 via openalex
- W2136444780 via openalex
- doi:10.1007/s00404-013-3036-0 via openalex
- W2181969282 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s1701-2163(16)34351-1 via openalex
- W2418434472 via openalex
- doi:10.1007/s00404-013-3005-7 via openalex
- W2610888483 via openalex
- doi:10.1155/2018/9368298 via openalex
- doi:10.1111/jog.13932 via openalex
- doi:10.1097/01.spv.0000159923.48505.69 via openalex
- W6678848921 via openalex
- doi:10.1097/01.ogx.0000216647.40390.9e via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.jclinane.2004.06.019 via openalex
- doi:10.1097/nci.0b013e3182a6ee6d via openalex
- doi:10.1136/emj.18.3.205 via openalex
- doi:10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0029-7844(99)00557-8 via openalex
- doi:10.1186/1471-2288-14-135 via openalex
- doi:10.5152/jtgga.2010.33 via openalex
- doi:10.5152/eurasianjmed.2016.0068 via openalex
- doi:10.1111/j.1553-2712.1998.tb02667.x via openalex
- doi:10.5681/jcs.2013.026 via openalex
- doi:10.1111/j.1479-828x.2009.01109.x via openalex
- doi:10.1080/01443610400025390 via openalex
- doi:10.1155/2014/104053 via openalex
- doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2001.00005.x via openalex
- doi:10.1034/j.1600-0412.2000.079009793.x via openalex
- doi:10.1097/aog.0b013e3181a6d011 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.ijgo.2006.11.017 via openalex
- doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2005.00812.x via openalex
- doi:10.1002/1097-0142(20001015)89:8<1765::aid-cncr17>3.0.co;2-f via openalex
Cited by (3)
- Optimizing analgesia for endometrial biopsy: A prospective, randomized comparative study 2024
- Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation for Analgesia During Outpatient Endometrial Biopsy 2024
- Factors Influencing on Pain in Patients Undergoing Pipelle Endometrial Biopsy for Abnormal Uterine Bleeding: Why a Personalized Approach Should Be Applied? 2022
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-05-10T10:46:53.257684+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-06-02T02:00:03.124865+00:00
License: CC0
· commercial use OK