Experience of our clinic in intrauterine insemination cycles made with microfluidic sperm sorting chips
Retrospective analysis of 133 IUI cycles in patients with unexplained infertility, mild male factor, ovulatory dysfunction, or mild endometriosis demonstrated a 19.5% clinical pregnancy rate using microfluidic sperm sorting chips.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
This retrospective study analyzed 133 intrauterine insemination cycles performed at Giresun University using microfluidic sperm sorting chips to evaluate clinical pregnancy rates. The patient cohort included individuals with unexplained infertility, mild male factor issues, polycystic ovary syndrome, and a small subset with mild endometriosis or ovulatory dysfunction. Results indicated a clinical pregnancy rate of 19.5%, with the authors concluding that the microfluidic method offers a practical and rapid alternative to conventional sperm preparation techniques. Relevance to endometriosis: listed as one indication for inclusion in the patient cohort, though the paper's main focus is optimizing sperm selection methods for general infertility treatment.
Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
Full text
3,880 characters
· extracted from
oa-doi-fallback
· 4 sections
· click to expand
Objective
Material and methods
Results
Conclusion
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works
Condition tags
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
References (12)
- W1966428301 via openalex
- W1976266332 via openalex
- W1987742652 via openalex
- W2022981615 via openalex
- W2052084124 via openalex
- W2117786001 via openalex
- W2128718884 via openalex
- W2175735834 via openalex
- W2181337632 via openalex
- W2506645050 via openalex
- W2905330168 via openalex
- W4238657475 via openalex
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-06-04T00:00:01.174412+00:00